Chapter 16 : Quality Assurance

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in

Quality Assurance, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555815882/9781555813796_Chap16-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555815882/9781555813796_Chap16-2.gif


This chapter discusses the principles of quality assurance (QA) and provides a discussion of techniques that can be used to train personnel to QA requirements. Starting with the definition of QA and its counterparts, quality control (QC) and quality improvement, the chapter then moves into a description of general QA program components. Quality assurance is not new to environmental microbiology. However, with the emphasis in environmental sciences being the detection of chemical contaminants and resulting engineered solutions (e.g., Superfund), environmental quality assurance (QA) program requirements have focused on the chemistry and engineering fields. Instructors employed to present the QA program can emphasize problem areas and are present to answer questions. The use of proceduralize scientific notebook, including organization, formatting, entry and attachment techniques, types of reviews, and archival protocols ensure uniform practices. Record-keeping requirements address the types of information to be documented, as well as the techniques to use. Sampling is an integral part of the study design. The selection of sampling sites and sampling strategies is based upon the study objectives and hypotheses. The second and third types of errors may be termed scientific misconduct and can have far-reaching effects, especially in the health fields, resulting in potential harm to humans at the worst and reflecting poorly on the research field at the least. The chapter defines and provides examples, when possible, of typical QA requirements that the environmental microbiologist might implement.

Citation: Cross-Smiecinski A. 2007. Quality Assurance, p 190-198. In Hurst C, Crawford R, Garland J, Lipson D, Mills A, Stetzenbach L (ed), Manual of Environmental Microbiology, Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815882.ch16

Key Concept Ranking

Environmental Microbiology
Chemical Contaminants
Phase-Contrast Microscopy
pH Meter
Clinical Trials
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...


1. ASME Nuclear Quality Assurance Committee. 1994. Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications. ASME NQA-1-1994. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, N.Y.
2. Bird, S. J.,, and D. Hoffman-Kim (ed.). 1998. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 4, no. 1. Whistle Blowing and the Scientific Community. Opragen Publications, Surrey, United Kingdom.
3. Bordner, R.,, and J. Winter. 1978. Microbiological Methods for Monitoring the Environment, Water, and Wastes. EPA 600/8-78-017. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
4. Britton, L. J.,, and P. E Greeson (ed.). 1989. Methods for collection and analysis of aquatic biological and microbiological samples. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, book 5. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
5. Cross-Smiecinski, A. J.,, and L. D. Stetzenbach. 1994. Quality Planning for the Life Science Researcher. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
6. DeMets, D. 1999. Statistics and ethics in medical research. Sci. Eng. Ethics 5:97117.
7. Deming, S.,, and S. L. Morgan. 1993. Experimental Design: A Chemometric Approach, vol. 11, 2nd ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
8. Futrell, D. 1995. Quality Progress, p. 81–86. American Society of Quality Control, Milwaukee, Wis.
9. Ghiorse, W. C.,, and D. L Balkwill. 1983. Enumeration and morphological characterization of bacteria indigenous to subsurface environments. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 24:213224.
10. Greenberg, A. E.,, R. R. Trussell, and, L. S. Clesceri (ed.). 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
11. Gurudevan, S. V.,, and W. R. Mower. 1996. Misrepresentation of research publications among emergency medicine residency applicants. Ann. Emergency Med. 27:327330.
12. Harris, S. D. 1992. Software quality assurance requirements of a nuclear program written to meet current software quality assurance standards, p. 6A3.2. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual National Energy & Environmental Division Conference. American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, Wis.
13. Juran, J. M.,, F. M. Gryna, Jr., and, R. S. Bingham, Jr. 1979. Quality Control Handbook, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
14. Kanare, H. M. 1985. Writing the Laboratory Notebook, p. 74. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
15. Labeda, D. P. (ed.). 1990. Isolation of Biotechnological Organisms from Nature. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
16. Morris, C. R. 1993. Computer validation. Network News 7:13.
17. Parker, S. P. 1989. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
18. Price, A. R. 1994. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct. J. Higher Education 65:286297.
19. Ramos, S. J. 1992. A project manager’s primer on data validation, p. 4C4.4–4C4.6. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual National Energy & Environmental Division Conference. American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, Wis.
20. Simes, G. 1991. Preparation Aids for the Development of Category I-IV Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA 600/8-91/003-006. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
21. Taylor, J. K. 1987. Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Mich.
22. U.S. Department of Energy. 1991. Order 57006.c. Offices of Nuclear Energy and Environment, Safety, and Health, Washington, D.C.
23. U.S. Department of Energy. 2000. Quality Assurance Requirements Document. DOE/RW-0333P, revision 10. Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Revised Draft: EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans for Environmental Data Operations. EPA QA/R-5, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Interim Draft: EPA Requirements for Quality Management Plans. EPA QA/R-2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User’s Guide. EPA/600/8-89/046. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nev.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error