1887

Chapter 23 : Role for Autoinducer-2 in the Development of Commensal Streptococcal Biofilms

Authors: Alexander H. Rickard1, Adam J. Underwood2, Shawn R. Campagna3
VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
Affiliations: 1: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029; 2: Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902; 3: Department of Chemistry, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1600
Content Type: Monograph
Publication Year: 2011

Category: Genomics and Bioinformatics

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Ebook: Choose a downloadable PDF or ePub file. Chapter is a downloadable PDF file. File must be downloaded within 48 hours of purchase

Buy this Chapter
Digital (?) $15.00

Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Zoom in
Zoomout

Role for Autoinducer-2 in the Development of Commensal Streptococcal Biofilms, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817107/9781555815035_Chap23-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817107/9781555815035_Chap23-2.gif

Abstract:

This chapter focuses on the role of the candidate interspecies signaling molecule autoinducer-2 (AI-2), which is produced by the activity of the enzyme LuxS. It discusses its contribution to the development of dental plaque. A number of studies have been conducted on the impact of AI-2 and LuxS on dental plaque development. While investigations of the role(s) of AI-2 are still in their infancy, it is clear that the activity of LuxS and AI-2 moderates certain phenotypic characteristics of oral commensal and oral pathogenic bacteria. Particular notice in this chapter is given to LuxS-and AI-2-mediated interactions between the commensals 34 and T14V, which are two initial colonizers of dental plaque. LsrB-like ribose transport periplasmic binding protein, in concert with LsrB, enhances biofilm formation through the recognition and uptake of AI-2. Of relevance to the oral streptococci and this chapter, a cursory examination of streptococcal genomes indicates that various spp. express RbsB-like protein. Thus, membrane-bound receptors and/or transport proteins may facilitate accumulation of AI-2 and intracellular signaling in streptococci. This chapter discusses studies of 34 and T14V and their implication in future studies of AI-2-mediated communication. An interesting aspect of Sorbarod studies was that the data suggested that colocalization of 34 and T14V facilitates the uptake and/or sequestering of AI-2 by one or both species.

Citation: Rickard A, Underwood A, Campagna S. 2011. Role for Autoinducer-2 in the Development of Commensal Streptococcal Biofilms, p 345-355. In Kolenbrander P (ed), Oral Microbial Communities. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817107.ch23

Key Concept Ranking

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
0.40804482
0.40804482
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Figures

Role for Autoinducer-2 in the Development of Commensal Streptococcal Biofilms
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-1,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Alexander H., foaf_name=Alexander H. Rickard, foaf_surname=Rickard, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-2,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-2,properties={foaf_givenname=Adam J., foaf_name=Adam J. Underwood, foaf_surname=Underwood, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-aff2]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-3,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-3,properties={foaf_givenname=Shawn R., foaf_name=Shawn R. Campagna, foaf_surname=Campagna, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23-aff3]]}]]
Citation: Rickard A, Underwood A, Campagna S. 2011. Role for Autoinducer-2 in the Development of Commensal Streptococcal Biofilms, p 345-355. In Kolenbrander P (ed), Oral Microbial Communities. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817107.ch23
/content/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23.ch23fig01
FIGURE 1
Diagram showing the biochemical pathway by which oral streptococci produce AI-2. DPD is produced as a consequence of the activity of the activated methyl cycle within the streptococcal cell (shown on the right). DPD spontaneously forms a collection of inter-convertible molecules in equilibrium. These are DPD-hydrate, -THMF, -THMF, and - THMF-borate, as well as other possible borated forms. -THMF is recognized by serovar Typhimurium, and -THMF-borate is recognized by Molecules described for the activated methyl cycle include SAM synthetase (MetK), SAM, SAH, adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase (Pfs), SRH, -ribosylhomocysteinase (LuxS), cobalamin-independent methionine synthase (MetE), cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase (MetH), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (HC-THF), 5-methyltetrahydropteroryl glutamate (HC-THPG), tetrahydrofolate (THF), and tetrahydropteroryl glutamate (THPG).
10.1128/9781555817107/f0347-01_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555817107/f0347-01.gif
Image of FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Diagram showing the biochemical pathway by which oral streptococci produce AI-2. DPD is produced as a consequence of the activity of the activated methyl cycle within the streptococcal cell (shown on the right). DPD spontaneously forms a collection of inter-convertible molecules in equilibrium. These are DPD-hydrate, -THMF, -THMF, and - THMF-borate, as well as other possible borated forms. -THMF is recognized by serovar Typhimurium, and -THMF-borate is recognized by Molecules described for the activated methyl cycle include SAM synthetase (MetK), SAM, SAH, adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase (Pfs), SRH, -ribosylhomocysteinase (LuxS), cobalamin-independent methionine synthase (MetE), cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase (MetH), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (HC-THF), 5-methyltetrahydropteroryl glutamate (HC-THPG), tetrahydrofolate (THF), and tetrahydropteroryl glutamate (THPG).

Citation: Rickard A, Underwood A, Campagna S. 2011. Role for Autoinducer-2 in the Development of Commensal Streptococcal Biofilms, p 345-355. In Kolenbrander P (ed), Oral Microbial Communities. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817107.ch23
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817107.ch23
1. Aas, J. A.,, B. J. Paster,, L. N. Stokes,, I. Olsen, and, F. E. Dewhirst. 2005. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5721–5732.
2. Ahmed, N. A.,, F. C. Petersen, and, A. A. Scheie. 2007. AI-2 quorum sensing affects antibiotic susceptibility in Streptococcus anginosus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:49–53.
3. Blehert, D. S.,, R. J. Palmer, Jr.,, J. B. Xavier,, J. S. Almeida, and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2003. Autoinducer 2 production by Streptococcus gordonii DL1 and the biofilm phenotype of a luxS mutant are influenced by nutritional conditions. J. Bacteriol. 185:4851–4860.
4. Budhani, R. K.,, and J. K. Struthers. 1997. The use of Sorbarod biofilms to study the antimicrobial susceptibility of a strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:601–602.
5. Camilli, A.,, and B. L. Bassler. 2006. Bacterial smallmolecule signaling pathways. Science 311:1113–1116.
6. Chalmers, N. I.,, R. J. Palmer, Jr.,, J. O. Cisar, and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2008. Characterization of a Streptococcus sp.-Veillonella sp. community micromanipulated from dental plaque. J. Bacteriol. 190:8145–8154.
7. Chen, X.,, S. Schauder,, N. Potier,, A. Van Dorsselaer,, I. Pelczer,, B. L. Bassler, and, F. M. Hughson. 2002. Structural identification of a bacterial quorumsensing signal containing boron. Nature 415:545–549.
8. Cisar, J. O.,, P. E. Kolenbrander, and, F. C. McIntire. 1979. Specificity of coaggregation reactions between human oral streptococci and strains of Actinomyces viscosus or Actinomyces naeslundii. Infect. Immun. 24:742–752.
9. De Keersmaecker, S. C.,, K. Sonck, and, J. Vanderleyden. 2006. Let LuxS speak up in AI-2 signaling. Trends Microbiol. 14:114–119.
10. Diaz, P. I.,, N. I. Chalmers,, A. H. Rickard,, C. Kong,, C. L. Milburn,, R. J. Palmer, Jr., and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2006. Molecular characterization of subject-specific oral microflora during initial colonization of enamel. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:2837–2848.
11. Duan, K.,, C. Dammel,, J. Stein,, H. Rabin, and, M. G. Surette. 2003. Modulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene expression by host micro-flora through interspecies communication. Mol. Microbiol. 50:1477–1491.
12. Egland, P. G.,, R. J. Palmer, Jr., and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2004. Interspecies communication in Streptococcus gordonii-Veillonella atypica biofilms: signaling in flow conditions requires juxtaposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:16917–16922.
13. Foster, J. S.,, and P. E. Kolenbrander. 2004. Development of a multispecies oral bacterial community in a saliva-conditioned flow cell. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:4340–4348.
14. Frias, J.,, E. Olle, and, M. Alsina. 2001. Periodontal pathogens produce quorum sensing signal molecules. Infect. Immun. 69:3431–3434.
15. Fuqua, C.,, M. R. Parsek, and, E. P. Greenberg. 2001. Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:439–468.
16. Gander, S.,, A. Kinnaird, and, R. Finch. 2005. Telavancin: in vitro activity against staphylococci in a biofilm model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:337–343.
17. Gibbons, R. J.,, and M. Nygaard. 1970. Interbacterial aggregation of plaque bacteria. Arch. Oral Biol. 15:1397–1400.
18. Gilbert, P.,, P. J. Collier, and, M. R. Brown. 1990. Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1865–1868.
19. Guggenheim, M.,, S. Shapiro,, R. Gmur, and, B. Guggenheim. 2001. Spatial arrangements and associative behavior of species in an in vitro oral biofilm model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1343–1350.
20. James, C. E.,, Y. Hasegawa,, Y. Park,, V. Yeung,, G. D. Tribble,, M. Kuboniwa,, D. R. Demuth, and, R. J. Lamont. 2006. LuxS involvement in the regulation of genes coding for hemin and iron acquisition systems in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 74:3834–3844.
21. James, D.,, H. Shao,, R. J. Lamont, and, D. R. Demuth. 2006. The Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans ribose binding protein RbsB interacts with cognate and heterologous autoinducer 2 signals. Infect. Immun. 74:4021–4029.
22. Joint, I.,, J. Allan Downie, and, P. Williams. 2007. Bacterial conversations: talking, listening and eavesdropping. An introduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 362:1115–1117.
23. Joyce, E. A.,, A. Kawale,, S. Censini,, C. C. Kim,, A. Covacci, and, S. Falkow. 2004. LuxS is required for persistent pneumococcal carriage and expression of virulence and biosynthesis genes. Infect. Immun. 72:2964–2975.
24. Kilian, M.,, L. Mikkelsen, and, J. Henrichsen. 1989. Taxonomic study of viridans streptococci: description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:471–484.
25. Kolenbrander, P. E.,, R. N. Andersen,, D. S. Blehert,, P. G. Egland,, J. S. Foster, and, R. J. Palmer, Jr. 2002. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:486–505.
26. Kolenbrander, P. E.,, and J. London. 1993. Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J. Bacteriol. 175:3247–3252.
27. Kolenbrander, P. E.,, R. J. Palmer, Jr.,, A. H. Rickard,, N. S. Jakubovics,, N. I. Chalmers, and, P. I. Diaz. 2006. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontol. 2000 42:47–79.
28. Ledder, R. G.,, P. Gilbert,, A. Pluen,, P. K. Sreenivasan,, W. De Vizio, and, A. J. McBain. 2006. Individual microflora beget unique oral microcosms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100:1123–1131.
29. Li, Y. H.,, N. Tang,, M. B. Aspiras,, P. C. Lau,, J. H. Lee,, R. P. Ellen, and, D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2002. A quorumsensing signaling system essential for genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 184:2699–2708.
30. Lyon, W. R.,, J. C. Madden,, J. C. Levin,, J. L. Stein, and, M. G. Caparon. 2001. Mutation of luxS affects growth and virulence factor expression in Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 42:145–157.
31. Marsh, P. D. 2005. Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community lifestyle. J. Clin. Periodontol. 32(Suppl. 6):7–15.
32. Marsh, P. D.,, and D. J. Bradshaw. 1995. Dental plaque as a biofilm. J. Ind. Microbiol. 15:169–175.
33. McBain, A. J.,, C. Sissons,, R. G. Ledder,, P. K. Sreenivasan,, W. De Vizio, and, P. Gilbert. 2005. Development and characterization of a simple perfused oral microcosm. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98:624–634.
34. McNab, R.,, S. K. Ford,, A. El-Sabaeny,, B. Barbieri,, G. S. Cook, and, R. J. Lamont. 2003. LuxS-based signaling in Streptococcus gordonii: autoinducer 2 controls carbohydrate metabolism and biofilm formation with Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Bacteriol. 185:274–284.
35. Meijler, M. M.,, L. G. Hom,, G. F. Kaufmann,, K. M. McKenzie,, C. Sun,, J. A. Moss,, M. Matsushita, and, K. D. Janda. 2004. Synthesis and biological validation of a ubiquitous quorumsensing molecule. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43:2106–2108.
36. Miller, M. B.,, and B. L. Bassler. 2001. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55:165–199.
37. Miller, S. T.,, K. B. Xavier,, S. R. Campagna,, M. E. Taga,, M. F. Semmelhack,, B. L. Bassler, and, F. M. Hughson. 2004. Salmonella typhimurium recognizes a chemically distinct form of the bacterial quorumsensing signal AI-2. Mol. Cell 15:677–687.
38. Novak, E. A.,, H. Shao,, C. A. Daep, and, D. R. Demuth. 2010. Autoinducer-2 and QseC control biofilm formation and in vivo virulence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Infect. Immun. 78:2919–2926.
39. Palmer, R. J., Jr.,, K. Kazmerzak,, M. C. Hansen, and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2001. Mutualism versus independence: strategies of mixed-species oral biofilms in vitro using saliva as the sole nutrient source. Infect. Immun. 69:5794–5804.
40. Paster, B. J.,, S. K. Boches,, J. L. Galvin,, R. E. Ericson,, C. N. Lau,, V. A. Levanos,, A. Sahasrabudhe, and, F. E. Dewhirst. 2001. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J. Bacteriol. 183:3770–3783.
41. Paster, B. J.,, I. Olsen,, J. A. Aas, and, F. E. Dewhirst. 2006. The breadth of bacterial diversity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Periodontol. 2000 42:80–87.
42. Pecharki, D.,, F. C. Petersen, and, A. A. Scheie. 2008. LuxS and expression of virulence factors in Streptococcus intermedius. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 23:79–83.
43. Pereira, C. S.,, J. R. McAuley,, M. E. Taga,, K. B. Xavier, and, S. T. Miller. 2008. Sinorhizobium meliloti, a bacterium lacking the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) synthase, responds to AI-2 supplied by other bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 70:1223–1235.
44. Petersen, F. C.,, N. A. Ahmed,, A. Naemi, and, A. A. Scheie. 2006. LuxS-mediated signalling in Streptococcus anginosus and its role in biofilm formation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 90:109–121.
45. Petersen, F. C.,, L. Tao, and, A. A. Scheie. 2005. DNA binding-uptake system: a link between cell-to-cell communication and biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 187:4392–4400.
46. Rezzonico, F.,, and B. Duffy. 2008. Lack of genomic evidence of AI-2 receptors suggests a non-quorum sensing role for luxS in most bacteria. BMC Microbiol. 8:154.
47. Rickard, A. H.,, S. R. Campagna, and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2008. Autoinducer-2 is produced in saliva-fed flow conditions relevant to natural oral biofilms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105:2096–2103.
48. Rickard, A. H.,, P. Gilbert,, N. J. High,, P. E. Kolenbrander, and, P. S. Handley. 2003. Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multispecies biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 11:94–100.
49. Rickard, A. H.,, R. J. Palmer, Jr.,, D. S. Blehert,, S. R. Campagna,, M. F. Semmelhack,, P. G. Egland,, B. L. Bassler, and, P. E. Kolenbrander. 2006. Autoinducer 2: a concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth. Mol. Microbiol. 60:1446–1456.
50. Ryan, R. P.,, and J. M. Dow. 2008. Diffusible signals and interspecies communication in bacteria. Microbiology 154:1845–1858.
51. Semmelhack, M. F.,, S. R. Campagna,, M. J. Federle, and, B. L. Bassler. 2005. An expeditious synthesis of DPD and boron binding studies. Org. Lett. 7:569–572.
52. Shao, H.,, D. James,, R. J. Lamont, and, D. R. Demuth. 2007. Differential interaction of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans LsrB and RbsB proteins with autoinducer 2. J. Bacteriol. 189:5559–5565.
53. Shao, H.,, R. J. Lamont, and, D. R. Demuth. 2007. Autoinducer 2 is required for biofilm growth of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans. Infect. Immun. 75:4211–4218.
54. Siller, M.,, R. P. Janapatla,, Z. A. Pirzada,, C. Hassler,, D. Zinkl, and, E. Charpentier. 2008. Functional analysis of the group A streptococcal luxS/AI-2 system in metabolism, adaptation to stress and interaction with host cells. BMC Microbiol. 8:188.
55. Sun, J.,, R. Daniel,, I. Wagner-Dobler, and, A. P. Zeng. 2004. Is autoinducer-2 a universal signal for interspecies communication: a comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of the synthesis and signal transduction pathways. BMC Evol. Biol. 4:36.
56. Suntharalingam, P.,, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2005. Quorum sensing in streptococcal biofilm formation. Trends Microbiol. 13:3–6.
57. Surette, M. G.,, M. B. Miller, and, B. L. Bassler. 1999. Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: a new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1639–1644.
58. Sztajer, H.,, A. Lemme,, R. Vilchez,, S. Schulz,, R. Geffers,, C. Y. Yip,, C. M. Levesque,, D. G. Cvitkovitch, and, I. Wagner-Dobler. 2008. Autoinducer-2-regulated genes in Streptococcus mutans UA159 and global metabolic effect of the luxS mutation. J. Bacteriol. 190:401–415.
59. Vendeville, A.,, K. Winzer,, K. Heurlier,, C. M. Tang, and, K. R. Hardie. 2005. Making ‘sense’ of metabolism: autoinducer-2, LuxS and pathogenic bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3:383–396.
60. Winzer, K.,, K. R. Hardie, and, P. Williams. 2003. LuxS and autoinducer-2: their contribution to quorum sensing and metabolism in bacteria. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 53:291–396.
61. Xu, L.,, H. Li,, C. Vuong,, V. Vadyvaloo,, J. Wang,, Y. Yao,, M. Otto, and, Q. Gao. 2006. Role of the luxS quorumsensing system in biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 74:488–496.
62. Yoshida, A.,, T. Ansai,, T. Takehara, and, H. K. Kuramitsu. 2005. LuxS-based signaling affects Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:2372–2380.

Back to top
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error