1887

Chapter 9 : Criteria for Choosing the Right Rapid Method

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Ebook: Choose a downloadable PDF or ePub file. Chapter is a downloadable PDF file. File must be downloaded within 48 hours of purchase

Buy this Chapter
Digital (?) $15.00

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Criteria for Choosing the Right Rapid Method, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817121/9781555815424_Chap09-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817121/9781555815424_Chap09-2.gif

Abstract:

Microbiological food safety is achieved by strict adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices and implementation of adequate control measures in the production process to prevent the entry, survival, and/or growth of pathogens. The application of rapid methods can be a great advantage to respond quickly to outbreaks, reject contaminated raw materials before they enter the production chain, rapidly identify process failures to take corrective measures. This chapter provides an overview of criteria that can be useful to judge the suitability of a method. The criteria includes reliability, validation, acceptance by public health authorities and trade partners, time to result, costs, laboratory space, sample throughput, shelf life of reagents, competency level and workflow compatibility, and supply chain confidence. The chapter provides some general examples of the relative importance of these criteria for different applications, but it is up to the user to define which criteria are really essential and which are only desirable. Once the selection criteria are established, the next challenge is to find reliable information on how candidate methods score with respect to the requirements.

Citation: Joosten H, Marugg J. 2011. Criteria for Choosing the Right Rapid Method, p 137-143. In Hoorfar J (ed), Rapid Detection, Characterization, and Enumeration of Foodborne Pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817121.ch9
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817121.ch09
1. Anonymous. 2003. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Protocol for the Validation of Alternative Methods. (EN ISO 16140). European Committee for Standardization, AFNOR, Paris, France.
2. Clark, S. A.,, K. C. Thompson,, C. W. Keevil, and, M. S. Smith (ed.). 1999. Rapid Detection Assays for Food and Water. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
3. Downes, F. P.,, and K. Ito (ed.). 2001. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 4th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
4. Feldsine, P.,, C. Abeyta, and, W. Andrews. 2002. AOAC International Methods Committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. J. AOAC Int. 85:11871200.
5. Guillaume-Gentil, O.,, V. Sonnard,, M. C. Kandhai,, J. D. Marugg, and, H. Joosten. 2005. A simple and rapid cultural method for detection of Enterobacter sakazakii in environmental samples. J. Food Prot. 68:6469.
6. Iversen, C.,, P. Druggan,, S. Schumacher,, A. Lehner,, C. Feer,, K. Gschwend,, H. Joosten, and, R. Stephan. 2008. Development of a novel screening method for the isolation of Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:25502553.
7. Jarvis, B. 2008. On the compositing of samples for qualitative microbiological testing. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45:592598.
8. Joosten, H.,, E. Bidlas, and, N. Garofalo. 2006. Salmonella detection in probiotic products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 110:104107.
9. Levin, R. E. 2009. Rapid Detection and Characterization of Foodborne Pathogens by Molecular Techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
10. Lombard, B. 2006. Estimation of measurement uncertainty in food microbiology: the ISO approach. Accred. Qual. Assur. 11:94100.
11. Miled, R. B.,, S. Neves,, N. Baudouin,, B. Lombard,, V. Deperrois,, P. Colin, and, N. G. Besse. 2010. Impact of pooling powdered infant formula samples on bacterial evolution and Cronobacter detection. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 138:250259.
12. Patel, P. D. (ed.). 1994. Rapid analysis techniques in food microbiology. Blackwell Academic and Professional, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
13. Stannard, C.,, S. Petitt, and, F. Skinner (ed.). 1990. Rapid Microbiological Methods for Foods, Beverages and Pharmaceuticals. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, United Kingdom.
14. Stephens, P. J.,, J. A. Joynson,, K. W. Davies,, R. Holbrook,, H. M. Lappin-Scott, and, T. J. Humphrey. 1997. The use of an automated growth analyser to measure recovery times of single heat-injured Salmonella cells. J. Appl. Microbiol. 83:445455.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE 1

Typical examples of the relative importance of selection criteria for analytical methods

Citation: Joosten H, Marugg J. 2011. Criteria for Choosing the Right Rapid Method, p 137-143. In Hoorfar J (ed), Rapid Detection, Characterization, and Enumeration of Foodborne Pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817121.ch9

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error