1887

Chapter 38 : Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Ebook: Choose a downloadable PDF or ePub file. Chapter is a downloadable PDF file. File must be downloaded within 48 hours of purchase

Buy this Chapter
Digital (?) $30.00

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817282/9781555817275_Chap38-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817282/9781555817275_Chap38-2.gif

Abstract:

Beyond the basic logistical issues surrounding the battle for laboratory reimbursement are a number of issues that pertain to the rules of engagement. This chapter discusses the rules set forth by third-party payors that determine claim payment. Criteria for conditions of coverage for laboratory services historically have as their bases a number of elements such as evidence-based-medicine element and medical-ethics element. The coding requirements for claim transactions have been standardized under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require submission of all standard code and transaction sets. The chapter describes certain special coverage conditions for which unique billing rules may apply. In the Medicare program, special rules apply, particularly in the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and its management in dialysis centers and in payment for laboratory services in Part A skilled-nursing facilities (SNF). Medical-necessity edits have been developed that specify both the procedures performed and the reason for performing the procedures on a given date of service. These edits when developed and applied nationally are known as national coverage determinations (NCDs) or local coverage determinations (LCDs) when developed by individual contractors on local policies. Careful review of these remittance documents provides a mechanism to identify billing problems that are costly in terms of both uncompensated labor and lost revenue. The most common reasons for claims denial include lack of medical-necessity documentation, the fact that the service performed is noncovered, inadequacy or lack of basic identifying documentation, and incorrect coding.

Citation: Baselski V, Weissfeld A, Sorrell F. 2014. Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, p 657-669. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management, Second Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817282.ch38

Key Concept Ranking

Hepatitis B
0.53571427
Treponema pallidum
0.4908824
Surface Antigens
0.46787226
0.53571427
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817282.chap38
1. Alwell, M. 2003. Stem revenue losses with effective CDM management. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 57:8488 [PubMed]
1a.American Medical Association. 2012. Principles of CPT Coding. AMA Press, Chicago, IL.
2. Carter, D. 2002. Optimizing revenue by reducing medical necessity claims denials. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 56:8894. [PubMed]
3. Cathey, R. 2003. 5 ways to reduce claims denials. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 57:4448. [PubMed]
4. Mesaros, F. 2000. The remittance advice, auditing for compliance. Clin. Leadersh. Manag. Rev. 14(2):6971. [PubMed]
5. Murray, M. E.,, and J. B. Henriques. 2003. Denials of reimbursement for hospital care. Manag. Care Interface 16:2227. [PubMed]
6. Parker, S.,, N. Davidson,, and R. Gagliano. 2002. Preventing and dealing with ESRD claim denials. Nephrol. News Issues 16:1821, 2526. [PubMed]
7. Reed, R. L., II,, K. A. David,, G. M. Silver,, T. J. Esposito,, V. Tsit-lik,, T. O'Hern,, and R. L. Gamelli. 2003. Reducing trauma payment denials with computerized collaborative billing. J. Trauma 55:762770. [PubMed][CrossRef]
8. Reiser, W. S.,, and B. O. Brunicardi. 2002. Assessing the impact of Medicare payment changes. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 56:6871. [PubMed]
9. Scott, M.,, and D. Nguyen. 2009. Clinical laboratory compliance: something old, something new. Lab Med. 40:428435.
10. Wallack, S. S.,, and C. P. Tompkins. 2003. Realigning incentives in fee-for-service Medicare. Health Aff. (Millwood) 22:5970. [PubMed]

Tables

Generic image for table
Table 38.1

Major required elements for claims submission and subsequent reimbursement

CLIA, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments.

Citation: Baselski V, Weissfeld A, Sorrell F. 2014. Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, p 657-669. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management, Second Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817282.ch38
Generic image for table
Table 38.2

Procedure code edits

AMA, American Medical Association.

Citation: Baselski V, Weissfeld A, Sorrell F. 2014. Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, p 657-669. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management, Second Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817282.ch38
Generic image for table
Table 38.3

National Coverage Determinations

Citation: Baselski V, Weissfeld A, Sorrell F. 2014. Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, p 657-669. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management, Second Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817282.ch38
Generic image for table
Table 38.4

Medicare laboratory screening benefits

See coding guidance at http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM6786.pdf (last accessed November 20, 2012).

See coding guidance at http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM7610.pdf (last accessed November 20, 2012).

Citation: Baselski V, Weissfeld A, Sorrell F. 2014. Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, p 657-669. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management, Second Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817282.ch38
Generic image for table
Table 38.5

Special coverage conditions

Citation: Baselski V, Weissfeld A, Sorrell F. 2014. Rules and Regulations in Reimbursement, p 657-669. In Garcia L (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management, Second Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817282.ch38

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error