Chapter 50 : The Future Practice of Laboratory Medicine

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in

The Future Practice of Laboratory Medicine, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817695/9781555812799_Chap50-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817695/9781555812799_Chap50-2.gif


This chapter explores the future practice of laboratory medicine against the background of a rapidly changing healthcare environment. Despite the decline in the number of separate laboratory medicine departments, the laboratory medicine tradition of serious attention to the research and teaching aspects of the discipline continues in several combined departments. The reaction to the changes that have occurred in the healthcare environment in recent years is essentially twofold: increased efforts to contain costs and increased public demand for appropriate and error-free medical care. Although total elimination of error is unrealistic, decreases in error comparable to those in many industries are now being viewed as within the range of a number of medical services, including laboratory medicine. The report emphasized that if residency programs were to be successful in training residents to serve as credible and useful consultants to clinicians, clinical pathology faculty would have to devise effective ways of teaching test strategy and interpretation. In recent years, individual case reports and series of cases have given way to more scientifically rigorous clinical trials providing the most recent and reliable information, thereby providing the physician with the tools to practice evidence-based medicine.

Citation: Burke M. 2004. The Future Practice of Laboratory Medicine, p 808-814. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch50

Key Concept Ranking

Western Blotting
Molecular Techniques
Clinical Trials
Nucleic Acids
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...


1. Benson, E. S. 1981. Laboratory medicine in the United States—the dream and the reality. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 76:17.
2. Burke, M. D. 1994. Clinical pathology residency training: the need for reform. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 118:489490.
3. Burke, M. D. 1995. Clinical laboratory consultation. Clin. Chem. 41:12371240.
4. Burke, M. D. 1995. The future of clinical pathology. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 103:121122.
5. Burke, M. D. 2003. Clinical laboratory consultation: appropriateness to laboratory medicine. Clin. Chim. Acta 333:125129.
6. Burke, M. D. 2000. Laboratory medicine in the 21st century. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 114:841846.
7.Conjoint Task Force of Clinical Pathology Residency Training Writing Committee. 1995. Graylyn Conference Report. Recommendations for reform of clinical pathology residency training. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 103:127129.
8. Connelly, D. 2002. Using web technologies for implementing testing strategies. Clin. Lab. Med. 22:529545.
9.The Dark Report. 2002. Newsmaker interview 9(6):914.
10.The Dark Report. 2002. Pathology trends for 2002 show future direction. 9(1):28.
11. Dighe, A. S.,, B. L. Soderberg,, and M. Laposata. 2001. Narrative interpretations for clinical laboratory evaluations. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 116(Suppl. 1):S123S128.
12. Elson, R. B.,, and D. T. Connelly. 1998. Applications of computer-based clinical guidelines. JAMA 279:989990.
13. Hallworth, M.,, K. Hyde,, A. Cumming,, and I. Peake. 2002. The future for clinical scientists in laboratory medicine. Clin. Lab. Haematol. 24:197204.
14. Hersh, W. R. 2002. Medical informatics: improving health care through information. JAMA 288:19551958.
15. Horowitz, R. E. 1993. Clinical pathology in the community hospital. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 100(Suppl. 1):S24S25.
16. Horowitz, R. E. 1998. The successful community hospital pathologist—what it takes. Hum. Pathol. 29:211214.
17. Hunt, D. L.,, B. Haynes,, S. E. Hanna,, and K. Smith. 1998. Effect of computer-based decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 280:13391346.
18. Kassirer, J. P. 2000. Patients, physicians, and the internet. Health Aff. 19:115123.
19. Kratz, A.,, B. L. Soderberg,, Z. M. Szczepiorkowski,, A. S. Dighe,, J. Versalovic,, and M. Laposata. 2001. The generation of narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine: a description of service-specific sign-out rounds. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 116(Suppl. 1):S133S140.
20. Linsell, W. D. 1982. Clinical pathologists—a threatened species? J. Clin. Pathol. 35:249256.
21. MacMillan, D. H.,, B. L. Soderberg,, and M. Laposata. 2001. Regulations regarding reflexive testing and narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 116(Suppl. 1):S129S132.
22. Marshall, W. J.,, and G. S. Challand. 2000. Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 37:758763.
23. McNeely, M. D. D. 2002. The use of expert systems for improving test use and enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis. Clin. Lab.Med. 22:515528.
24. McNeely, M. D. D. 2002. The use of ordering protocols and other maneuvers: the Canadian experience. Clin. Lab. Med. 22:505514.
25. Mundinger, M. O. 1994. Advanced practice nursing—good medicine for physicians. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:211214.
26. Sackett, D. L.,, and S. E. Straus. 1998. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the “evidence cart.” JAMA 280:13361338.
27. Satava, R. M. 1999. Telemedicine and virtual reality, p. 1721. Proc. Am. Telemed. Assoc.Meet.
28. Smith, B. J.,, and M. D. D. McNeely. 1999. The influence of an expert system for test ordering and interpretation on laboratory investigations. Clin. Chem. 45:11681175.
29. Soloway, H. B. 1990. Patient-initiated laboratory testing: applauding the inevitable. JAMA 264:718.
30. Spielberg, A. R. 1998. Sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of E-mail for the patient physician relationship. JAMA 280:13531359.
31. Stewart, A. 1999. Evidence-based medicine: a new paradigm for the teaching and practice of medicine. Ann. Saudi Med. 19:3236.
32. Van Walraven, C.,, and C. D. Naylor. 1998. Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? JAMA 280:550558.
33. Wildsmith, S. E. 2001. Microarrays under the microscope. J. Clin.Mol. Pathol. 54:816.
34. Yellowlees, P. M.,, and P. M. Brooks. 1999. Health online: the future isn’t what it used to be. Med. J. Aust. 171:522525.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error