1887

Chapter 24 : The Paradigm Shift in Microbial Prospecting

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Ebook: Choose a downloadable PDF or ePub file. Chapter is a downloadable PDF file. File must be downloaded within 48 hours of purchase

Buy this Chapter
Digital (?) $15.00

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

The Paradigm Shift in Microbial Prospecting, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817770/9781555812676_Chap24-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817770/9781555812676_Chap24-2.gif

Abstract:

This chapter explores the posited paradigm shift from traditional microbiology to bioinformatics in the search for exploitable biology. It also refers to the extraordinary rate of biological data acquisition and deposition in the world's databases. These databases are classified by type (e.g., genomes, gene expression, proteins, RNA sequences, pathology), but the distinction between categories is often arbitrary and individual databases may provide more than one type of information. Integration of the molecular biology databases, although by no means perfect, has attracted serious attention and may be able to deliver useful information on issues such as a protein's structure, function, phylogenetic occurrence, expression, and protein-protein interactions. Similarly, the various bioinformatics research groups and commercial organizations are developing multidatabase query systems that enable interoperability of heterogeneous, formerly incompatible resources. Within the medical sector, bioinformatics objectives have included (i) the detection and identification of pathogens, (ii) the identity of drug targets, and (iii) the search for new drugs and vaccines. The final stratagem to be considered for producing novel exploitable biology is directed evolution, which, as genome sequencing projects continue to grow, promises to become a principal route for search and discovery. Evolution via natural and artificial (sensu traditional animal and plant breeding) selection is dependent on genetic variation, inheritance, and differential reproduction.

Citation: Bull A. 2004. The Paradigm Shift in Microbial Prospecting, p 241-249. In Bull A (ed), Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817770.ch24

Key Concept Ranking

Bacteria and Archaea
0.5425353
Environmental Microbiology
0.5195921
DNA Microarray Analysis
0.4169389
0.5425353
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Figures

Image of Figure 1
Figure 1

Biotechnology—routes to discovery.

Citation: Bull A. 2004. The Paradigm Shift in Microbial Prospecting, p 241-249. In Bull A (ed), Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817770.ch24
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817770.chap24
1. Akerley, B. J.,, E. J. Rubin,, A. Camilli,, D. J. Lampe,, H. M. Robertson,, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1998. Systematic identification of essential genes by in vitro mariner mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:89278932.
2. Allen, J. F. 2001. Bioinformatics and discovery: induction beckons again. BioEssays 23:104107.
3. Almeida, R.,, A. Norrish,, M. Levick,, D. Vetrie,, T. Freeman, et al. 2002. From genomes to vaccines: Leishmania as a model. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 357:511.
4. Altamirano, M. M.,, J. M. Blackburn,, C. Aguayo,, and A. R. Fersht. 2000. Directed evolution of new catalytic activity using the alpha/beta-barrel scaffold. Nature 403:617622.
5. Attwood, T. K.,, and C.J. Miller. 2001. Which craft is best in bioinformatics? Comp. Chem. 25:329339.
6. Baxevanis, A. D. 2002. The molecular biology database collection: 2002 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:112.
7. Bentley, S. D.,, K. F. Chater,, A. M. Cerdeno-tarraga,, G. L. Chaiis,, N. R. Thomson, et al. 2002. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature 417: 141147.
8. Bisby, F. A. 2000. The quiet revolution: biodiversity informatics and the Internet. Science 289:23092312.
9. Blohm, D. H.,, and A. Guiseppie-Elie. 2001. New developments in microarray technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12:4147.
10. Boorman, G. A.,, S. P. Anderson,, W. M. Casey,, R. H. Brown,, L. M. Crosby, et al. 2002. Toxicogenomics, drug discovery, and the pathologist. Toxicol. Pathol. 30:1527.
11. Brenner, S.,, M. Johnson,, J. Bridgham,, G. Golda,, D. H. Lloyd, et al. 2000. Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:630634.
12. Brent, R. 1999. Functional genomics: learning to think about gene expression data. Curr. Biol. 9:R338R341.
13. Brown, P. O.,, and D. Botstein. 1999. Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nat. Genet. Suppl. 21:3337.
14. Bull, A. T.,, A. C. Ward,, and M. Goodfellow. 2000. Search and discovery strategies for biotechnology: the paradigm shift. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:573606.
15. Bull, J. J.,, and H. A. Wichman. 2001. Applied evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:183217.
16. Chang, C. C. J.,, T. T. Chen,, B. W. Cox,, G. N. Dawes,, W. P. C. Stemmer, et al. 1999. Evolution of a cytokine using DNA family shuffling. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:793797.
17. Cho, J.-C.,, and J. M. Tiedje. 2001. Biogeography and degree of endemicity of fluorescent Pseudomonas strains in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:54485456.
18. Dean, P. M.,, E. D. Zanders,, and D. S. Bailey. 2001. Industrial-scale genomics-based drug design and discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 19:288292.
19. Earl, A. M.,, S. K. Rankin,, K. P. Kim,, O. N. Lamendola,, and J. R. Battista. 2002. Genetic evidence that the usvE gene product of Deinococcus radiodurans Rl is a UV damage endonuclease. J. Bacteriol. 184:10031009.
20. Edwards, J. L.,, M. A. Lane,, and E. B. Nielsen. 2000. Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. Science 289:23122314.
21. Edwards, J. S.,, M. Covert,, and B. Palsson. 2002. Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux-balance approach. Environ. Microbiol. 4:133140.
22. Fleischmann, R. D.,, M. D. Adams,, O. White,, R. A. Clayton,, E. F. Kirkness, et al. 1995. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496512.
23. Fuchs, R. 2002. From sequence to biology: the impact on bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 18:505506.
24. Gardner, M. J.,, N. Hall,, E. Fung,, O. White,, M. Berriman et al. 2002. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419:498511.
25. Gerstein, M. 2000. Integrative database analysis in structural genomics. Nat Struct. Biol 7:960963.
26. Gingeras, T. R.,, and C. Rosenow. 2000. Studying microbial genomics with high-density oligonucleotide arrays. ASM News 66: 463469.
27. Goodman, N. 2002. Biological data becomes computer literate: new advances in bioinformatics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:6871.
28. Hauser, N. C.,, K. Fellenberg,, and S. Rupp. 2002. How to discover pathogenic mechanisms. Screening 4:2831.
29. Huynen, M.,, T. Dandekar,, and P. Bork. 1998. Differential genome analysis applied to the species-specific features of Helicobacter pylori. FEBS Lett. 426:15.
30. Joern, J. M.,, P. Meinhold,, and F. H. Arnold. 2002. Analysis of shuffled gene libraries. J. Mol. Biol. 316:643656.
31. Kell, D. B.,, and R. D. King. 2000. On the optimization of classes for the assignment of unidentified reading frames in functional genomics programmes: the need for machine learning. Trends Biotechnol. 18:9398.
32. Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
33. Lehmann, M.,, C. Loch,, A. Middendorf,, D. Studer,, S. F. Lassen, et al. 2002. The consensus concept for thermostability engineering of proteins: further proof of concept. Prot. Eng. 15:403411.
34. Lucchini, S.,, A. Thompson,, and J. C. D. Hinton. 2001. Microarrays for microbiologists. Microbiology (UK) 147:14031414.
35. Luscombe, N. M.,, D. Greenbaum, and M. Gerstein. 2001. What is bioinformatics? a proposed definition and overview of the field. Methods Inform. Med. 40:346358.
36. Makarova, K. S.,, L. Ararvind,, Y. I. Wolf,, R. L. Tatusov,, K. W. Minton,, E. V. Koonin,, and M. J. Daly. 2001. Genome of the extremely radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans viewed from the perspective of comparative genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:4479.
37. Moxon, E. R.,, D. W. Hood,, N. J. Saunders,, E. K. H. Schweda,, and J. C. Richards. 2002. Functional genomics of pathogenic bacteria. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 357:109116.
38. Norris, S. J.,, and G. M. Weinstock. 2001. The genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphillis spirochaete: will clinicians benefit? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 13:2936.
39. Omura, S.,, H. Ikeda,, J. Ishikawa,, A. Hanamoto,, C. Takahashi, et al. 2001. Genome sequence of an industrial microorganism Streptomyces avermitilis: deducing the ability of producing secondary metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1221512220.
40. Orencia, M. C.,, J. S. Yoon,, J. E. Ness,, W. P. C. Stemmer,, and R. C. Stevens. 2001. Predicting the emergence of antibiotic resistance by directed evolution and structural analysis. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:238242.
41. Pikkemaat, M. G.,, and D. B. Janssen. 2002. Generating segmental mutations in haloalkane dehalogenase: a novel part in the directed evolution toolbox. Nucleic Acids. Res. 30:e35.
42. Posas, F.,, J. R. Chambers,, J. A. Heyman,, J. P. Hoeffler,, E. de Nadal,, and J. Arino. 2000. The transcriptional response of yeast to saline stress. J. Biol. Chem. 275:1724917255.
43. Powell, K. A.,, S. W. Ramer,, S. B. del Cardayre,, W. P. C. Stemmer,, M. B. Tobin, et al. 2001. Directed evolution and biocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40:39483959.
44. Roos, D. S.,, M. J. Crawford,, R. G. K. Donald,, M. Fraunholz,, O. S. Harb, et al. 2002. Mining the Plasmodium genome database to define organellar function: what does the apicoplast do? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 357:e1e12.
45. Rosamond, J.,, and A. Allsop. 2000. Harnessing the power of the genome in the search for new antibiotics. Science 287:19731976.
46. Schilling, C. H.,, J. S. Edwards,, and B. O. Palsson. 1999. Towards metabolic phenomics: analysis of genomic data using flux balances. Biotechnol. Prog. 15:288295.
47. Schmidt-Dannert, C. 2001. Directed evolution of single proteins, metabolic pathways, and viruses. Biochemistry 40:1312513134.
48. Scott, R. K. 2002. Chemical space in in silico screening. Screening 4:3234.
49. Selifonova, O.,, F. Valle,, and V. Schellenberger. 2001. Rapid evolution of novel traits in microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:36453649.
50. Siepel, A.,, A. Farmer,, A. Toopko,, M. Zhuang,, P. Mendes,, W. Beavis,, and B. Sobral. 2001. ISYS: a decentralized, component-based approach to the integration of heterogenous bioinformatics resources. Bioinformatics 17:8394.
51. Smalheiser, N. R. 2002. Informatics and hypothesis-driven research. EMBO Rep. 3:702703.
52. Takami, H.,, K. Nakasone,, Y. Takaki,, G. Maeno,, R. Sasaki, et al. 2000. Complete genome sequence of the alkaliphilic Bacillus halodurans and genomic sequence comparison with Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:43174331.
53. Tomita, M. 1999. E-CELL: software environment for whole cell simulation. Bioinformatics 15:7284.
54. Tomita, M. 2001. Towards computer aided design (CAD) of useful microorganisms. Bioinformatics 17:10911092.
55. Valencia, A. 2002. Search and retrieve. Large-scale generation is becoming increasingly important. EMBO Rep. 3:396405.
56. Van Dien, S. J.,, and M. E. Lidstrom. 2002. Stoichiometric model for evaluating the metabolic capabilities of the facultative methy-lotroph Methylobacterium extorquens AMI, with application to reconstruction of C3 and C4 metabolism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 78:296312.
57. Ward, D. C.,, and D. C. White. 2002. The new omics era. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:1113.
58. Watve, M. G.,, R. Tickoo,, M. M. Jog,, and B. D. Bhole. 2001. How many antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces? Arch. Microbiol. 176:386390.
59. Wheeler, D. L.,, D. M. Church,, A. E. Lash,, D. D. Leipe,, T. L. Madden, et al. 2002. Databases resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: 2002 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1316.
60. Wildpaner, M.,, G. Schneider,, A. Schleiffer,, and F. Eisenhaber. 2001. Taxonomy workbench. Bioinformatics 17:11791182.
61. Wilson, D. S.,, and S. Nock. 2002. Functional protein microarrays. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6:8185.
62. Wilson, W. J.,, C. L. Strout,, T. Z. DeSantis,, J. L. Stilwell,, A. V. Carrano,, and G. L. Andersen. 2002. Sequence-specific identification of 18 pathogenic microorganisms using microarray technology. Mol. Cell. Probes 16:119127.
63. Zhao, H.,, K. Chockalingam,, and Z. Chen. 2002. Directed evolution of enzymes and pathways for industrial biocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:104110.
64. Zhong, Y.,, Y. Luo,, S. Pramanik,, and J. H. Beaman. 1999. HI-CLAS: a taxonomic database system for displaying and comparing biological classification and phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 15:149156.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table 1

Impact of directed evolution on biotechnology

Citation: Bull A. 2004. The Paradigm Shift in Microbial Prospecting, p 241-249. In Bull A (ed), Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817770.ch24

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error