1887

Chapter 12 : Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817954/9781555812096_Chap12-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817954/9781555812096_Chap12-2.gif

Abstract:

The recently determined structure of a Flp-DNA complex confirms that its catalytic domain closely resembles that of other family members, although the active site itself is assembled differently. The reaction mechanism as drawn is the distillation of years of work by many laboratories. In addition to the structure of the Flp-DNA complex, which is the focus of this chapter, crystal structures of four members of this family have been determined: the core domains of the λ () and HP1 (23) phage integrases, intact XerD (52), and intact bacteriophage P1 Cre. The active site of Flp has been known for some time to differ from that of its relatives in one very important aspect: in contrast to other tyrosine recombinases, including the λ and HP1 phage integrases, Cre (20), and XerC and D (5, 7), the active sites within Flp complexes are composed of amino acid residues from two different monomers. The chapter briefly describes the structure of a Flp-Holliday junction complex and its biochemical implications, and explores its similarities to and differences from other tyrosine recombinases and the type IB topoisomerases.

Citation: Rice P. 2002. Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, p 219-229. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch12

Key Concept Ranking

Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
0.4712986
Type IB Topoisomerase
0.46044117
Spacer DNA
0.43962955
0.4712986
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Figures

Image of Figure 1
Figure 1

Proposed mechanism of site-specific recombination catalyzed by the tyrosine recombinases. Each recombinase monomer is represented by a single Y. Circles indicate the two active tyrosines, which form transient 3′ phosphotyrosine linkages with the DNA. The central isomerization step (right) activates the alternate pair of active sites, allowing for exchange of the second pair of DNA strands.

Citation: Rice P. 2002. Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, p 219-229. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch12
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 2
Figure 2

DNA substrate in the Flp crystal structure. (a) The symmetrized Flp binding site used in crystallization, numbered from center. Two identical half-sites (plain and bold text) anneal to form the duplex shown, with nicks at the junction. Flp cleaves DNA between nucleotides −4 and −5, one base away from the nick. (b) Pathway for formation of the Holliday junction present in the crystals. Two duplexes are synapsed by a tetramer of Flp protein. Only the sequence at the center is shown, and small circles represent the scissile phosphates. Due to the nicks, T-4 is lost into solution upon attack of the tyrosine. Since the spacer sequence used allows slippage of the base pairing, T-3 of the opposite duplex can fit into the pocket vacated by T-4, and its 5′ hydroxyl can attack the phosphotyrosine intermediate. After isomerization, the same sequence of events can occur at the other pair of active sites, resulting in a Holliday junction with a central unpaired A. All four scissile bonds were hydrolyzed at some point before data collection. This probably occurred because the Holliday junction was in equilibrium with the phosphotyrosine intermediate, which is subject to slow hydrolysis ( ).

Citation: Rice P. 2002. Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, p 219-229. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch12
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 3
Figure 3

Synaptic complexes of Flp and Cre. (a) Tube-and-arrow representation of the Flp complex. The N-terminal domain is above the DNA, and the catalytic domain, below. Inactive monomers are shaded. The trans-donated active site tyrosine is shown in black. The tyrosine donated by one of these monomers is disordered. Dotted lines represent connections not visible in the electron density. (b) Similar representation of the Cre complex ( ). The nucleophilic tyrosine is in dark gray but is largely occluded in this view. (c) and (d) The Flp and Cre complexes, rotated such that the catalytic domains are at the bottom of the picture. (e) and (f) Cartoons of the Flp and Cre complexes, as seen from the underside of panels a and b (catalytic domains above the DNA). HelicesMand N are shown explicitly. Note that in both cases, the helix M-N segment that traverses a type I interface contains the active tyrosine, regardless of the provenance of that tyrosine.

Citation: Rice P. 2002. Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, p 219-229. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch12
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 4
Figure 4

Proposed Holliday junction isomerization step for Flp-mediated recombination. Yapos;s represent the nucleophilic tyrosines and the circles denote the active pair. The two half-FRT sites under the attack of Y343 are below the plane of the figure. The conformational changes that must occur during isomerization can be deconvoluted into a translation of each monomer by ∼1.5 Å along the DNA axis, followed by 3 rotations pivoting about the scissile phosphate: a scissoring of the DNA arms by ∼7°, then a rotation of ∼15° that moves the DNA arms into or below the plane of the junction, followed by a rotation of ∼15° around the DNA axis itself. This isomerization changes a type I interface to a type II, and vice versa.

Citation: Rice P. 2002. Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, p 219-229. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch12
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 5
Figure 5

Proposed advantage for trans cleavage by Flp. (a) Cartoon of the Futcher model for amplification of the 2μm plasmid copy number by Flp recombination ( ). If Flp inverts the segment of DNA between the two FRT (Flp recombination target) sites after the replication fork has passed one, multiple copies of the plasmid are eventually made from a single firing of the origin. (b) Since Flp must act during replication, there is a danger of the replication machinery colliding with Flp in its covalent intermediate form. Although the original monomer may become unfolded or degraded after this encounter (“corpse”), a second monomer could catalyze the religation of the nick and release of the covalently bound damaged protein.

Citation: Rice P. 2002. Theme and Variation in Tyrosine Recombinases: Structure of a Flp-DNA Complex, p 219-229. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch12
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817954.chap12
1. Abremski, K.E., , and R. H. Hoess. 1992. Evidence for a second conserved arginine residue in the integrase family of recombination proteins. Protein Eng. 5: 87 91.
2. Altschul, S.F., , T. L. Madden,, A.A. Schaffer,, J. Zhang,, Z. Zhang,, W. Miller,, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389 3402.
3. Arciszewska, L.,, I. Grainge,, and D. Sherratt. 1995. Effects of Holliday junction position on Xer-mediated recombination in vitro. EMBO J. 14: 2651 2660.
4. Arciszewska, L. K.,, R.A. Baker,, B. Hallet,, and D. J. Sherratt. 2000. Coordinated control of XerC and XerD catalytic activities during Holliday junction resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 299: 391 403.
5. Arciszewska, L.K., , and D.J. Sherratt. 1995. Xer site-specific recombination in vitro. EMBO J. 14: 2112 2120.
6. Argos, P.,, A. Landy,, K. Abremski,, J.B. Egan,, E. Haggard-Ljungquist,, R.H. Hoess,, M. L. Kahn,, B. Kalionis,, S.V. Narayana,, L.S.D. Pierson, et al. 1986. The integrase family of sitespecific recombinases: regional similarities and global diversity. EMBO J. 5: 433 440.
7. Blakely, G.W., , A.O. Davidson,, and D.J. Sherratt. 1997. Binding and cleavage of nicked substrates by site-specific recombinases XerC and XerD. J. Mol. Biol. 265: 30 39.
8. Blakely, G.W., , and D. J. Sherratt. 1996. Cis and trans in sitespecific recombination. Mol. Microbiol. 20: 234 237.
9. Burgin, A.B., Jr.,, and H.A. Nash. 1995. Suicide substrates reveal properties of the homology-dependent steps during integrative recombination of bacteriophage lambda. Curr. Biol. 5: 1312 1321.
9a.. Carson, M. 1997. RIBBONS. Macromol. Crystallogr. B 277: 493 505.
10. Chen, J.W., , B.R. Evans,, S.H. Yang,, H. Araki,, Y. Oshima,, and M. Jayaram. 1992. Functional analysis of box I mutations in yeast site-specific recombinases Flp and R: pairwise complementation with recombinase variants lacking the active-site tyrosine. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 3757 3765.
11. Chen, Y.,, U. Narendra,, L.E. Iype,, M.M. Cox,, and P.A. Rice. 2000. Crystal structure of a Flp recombinase-Holliday junction complex: assembly of an active oligomer by helix swapping. Mol. Cell 6: 885 897.
12. Cheng, C.,, P. Kussie,, N. Pavletich,, and S. Shuman. 1998. Conservation of structure and mechanism between eukaryotic topoisomerase I and site-specific recombinases. Cell 92: 841 850.
13. Christiansen, K.,, B.R. Knudsen,, and O. Westergaard. 1994. The covalent eukaryotic topoisomerase I-DNA intermediate catalyzes pH-dependent hydrolysis and alcoholysis. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 11367 11373.
14. Esposito, D.,, and J. J. Scocca. 1997. The integrase family of tyrosine recombinases: evolution of a conserved active site domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3605 3614.
15. Futcher, A.B. 1986. Copy number amplification of the 2 micron circle plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Theor. Biol. 119: 197 204.
16. Gillette, W.K., , S. Rhee,, J.L. Rosner,, and R. G. Martin. 2000. Structural homology between MarA of the AraC family of transcriptional activators and the integrase family of site-specific recombinases. Mol. Microbiol. 35: 1582 1583.
17. Gopaul, D.N., , and G.D. Duyne. 1999. Structure and mechanism in site-specific recombination. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 14 20.
18. Gopaul, D.N., , F. Guo,, and G. D. Van Duyne. 1998. Structure of the Holliday junction intermediate in Cre-loxP site-specific recombination. EMBO J. 17: 4175 4187.
19. Grainge, I.,, and M. Jayaram. 1999. The integrase family of recombinase: organization and function of the active site. Mol. Microbiol. 33: 449 456.
20. Guo, F.,, D.N. Gopaul,, and G.D. van Duyne. 1997. Structure of Cre recombinase complexed with DNA in a site-specific recombination synapse. Nature 389: 40 46.
21. Guo, F.,, D.N. Gopaul,, and G. D. Van Duyne. 1999. Asymmetric DNA bending in the Cre-loxP site-specific recombination synapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 7143 7148.
22. Hallet, B.,, L.K. Arciszewska,, and D.J. Sherratt. 1999. Reciprocal control of catalysis by the tyrosine recombinases XerC and XerD: an enzymatic switch in site-specific recombination. Mol. Cell 4: 949 959.
23. Hickman, A.B., , S. Waninger,, J.J. Scocca,, and F. Dyda. 1997. Molecular organization in site-specific recombination: the catalytic domain of bacteriophage HP1 integrase at 2.7 A resolution. Cell 89: 227 237.
24. Hoess, R.H., , M. Ziese,, and N. Sternberg. 1982. P1 site-specific recombination: nucleotide sequence of the recombining sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 3398 3402.
25. Kimball, A.S., , J. Lee,, M. Jayaram,, and T. D. Tullius. 1993. Sequence-specific cleavage of DNA via nucleophilic attack of hydrogen peroxide, assisted by Flp recombinase. Biochemistry 32: 4698 4701.
26. Knudsen, B.R., , K. Dahlstrom,, O. Westergaard,, and M. Jayaram. 1997. The yeast site-specific recombinase Flp mediates alcoholysis and hydrolysis of the strand cleavage product: mimicking the strand-joining reaction with non-DNA nucleophiles. J. Mol. Biol. 266: 93 107.
27. Krogh, B.O., , and S. Shuman. 2000. Catalytic mechanism of DNA topoisomerase IB. Mol. Cell 5: 1035 1041.
28. Krogh, B.O., , and S. Shuman. 2000. DNA strand transfer catalyzed by vaccinia topoisomerase: peroxidolysis and hydroxylaminolysis of the covalent protein-DNA intermediate. Biochemistry 39: 6422 6432.
29. Kulpa, J.,, J.E. Dixon,, G. Pan,, and P.D. Sadowski. 1993. Mutations of the FLP recombinase gene that cause a deficiency in DNA bending and strand cleavage. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 1101 1108.
30. Kwon, H.J., , R. Tirumalai,, A. Landy,, and T. Ellenberger. 1997. Flexibility in DNA recombination: structure of the lambda integrase catalytic core. Science 276: 126 131.
31. Lee, J.,, and M. Jayaram. 1993. Mechanism of site-specific recombination. Logic of assembling recombinase catalytic site from fractional active sites. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 17564 17570.
32. Lee, J.,, and M. Jayaram. 1995. Role of partner homology in DNA recombination. Complementary base pairing orients the 5′-hydroxyl for strand joining during Flp site-specific recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 4042 4052.
33. Lee, J.,, M. Jayaram,, and I. Grainge. 1999. Wild-type Flp recombinase cleaves DNA in trans. EMBO J. 18: 784 791.
34. Lee, J.,, Y. Voziyanov,, S. Pathania,, and M. Jayaram. 1998. Structural alterations and conformational dynamics in Holliday junctions induced by binding of a site-specific recombinase. Mol. Cell 1: 483 493.
35. Meyer-Leon, L.,, R. B. Inman,, and M.M. Cox. 1990. Characterization of Holliday structures in FLP protein-promoted sitespecific recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 235 242.
36. Nunes-Duby, S.E.,, M.A. Azaro,, and A. Landy. 1995. Swapping DNA strands and sensing homology without branch migration in lambda site-specific recombination. Curr. Biol. 5: 139 148.
37. Nunes-Duby, S.E.,, H.J. Kwon,, R.S. Tirumalai,, T. Ellenberger,, and A. Landy. 1998. Similarities and differences among 105 members of the Int family of site-specific recombinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 391 406.
38. Nunes-Duby, S.E.,, L. Matsumoto,, and A. Landy. 1989. Halfatt site substrates reveal the homology independence and minimal protein requirements for productive synapsis in lambda excisive recombination. Cell 59: 197 206.
39. Nunes-Duby, S. E.,, R. S. Tirumalai,, L. Dorgai,, E. Yagil,, R.A. Weisberg,, and A. Landy. 1994. Lambda integrase cleavesDNA in cis. EMBO J. 13: 4421 4430.
40. Pan, G.,, K. Luetke,, C.D. Juby,, R. Brousseau,, and P. Sadowski. 1993. Ligation of synthetic activated DNA substrates by sitespecific recombinases and topoisomerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 3683 3689.
41. Pan, G.,, K. Luetke,, and P.D. Sadowski. 1993. Mechanism of cleavage and ligation by FLP recombinase: classification of mutations in FLP protein by in vitro complementation analysis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 3167 3175.
42. Pan, G.,, and P. D. Sadowski. 1992. Ligation activity of FLP recombinase. The strand ligation activity of a site-specific recombinase using an activated DNA substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 12397 12399.
43. Petersen, B.O.,, and S. Shuman. 1997. DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by vaccinia topoisomerase: hydrolysis and glycerololysis of the covalent protein-DNA intermediate. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 2091 2097.
44. Pouliot, J. J.,, K. C. Yao,, C.A. Robertson,, and H. A. Nash. 1999. Yeast gene for a Tyr-DNA phosphodiesterase that repairs topoisomerase I complexes. Science 286: 552 555.
45. Redinbo, M.R., , J.J. Champoux,, and W.G. Hol. 2000. Novel insights into catalytic mechanism from a crystal structure of human topoisomerase I in complex with DNA. Biochemistry 39: 6832 6840.
46. Redinbo, M.R., , L. Stewart,, P. Kuhn,, J.J. Champoux,, and W. G. Hol. 1998. Crystal structures of human topoisomerase I in covalent and noncovalent complexes with DNA. Science 279: 1504 1513.
47. Sadowski, P.D. 1995. The Flp recombinase of the 2-microns plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 51: 53 91.
48. Senecoff, J.F., , and M.M. Cox. 1986. Directionality in FLP protein-promoted site-specific recombination is mediated by DNA-DNA pairing. J. Biol. Chem. 261: 7380 7386.
49. Stark, W.M., , D.J. Sherratt,, and M.R. Boocock. 1989. Sitespecific recombination by Tn3 resolvase: topological changes in the forward and reverse reactions. Cell 58: 779 790.
50. Sternberg, N.,, and D. Hamilton. 1981. Bacteriophage P1 sitespecific recombination. I. Recombination between loxP sites. J. Mol. Biol. 150: 467 486.
51. Stewart, L.,, G.C. Ireton,, and J.J. Champoux. 1997. Reconstitution of human topoisomerase I by fragment complementation. J. Mol. Biol. 269: 355 372.
52. Subramanya, H. S.,, L.K. Arciszewska,, R.A. Baker,, L. E. Bird,, D.J. Sherratt,, and D.B. Wigley. 1997. Crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase, XerD. EMBO J. 16: 5178 5187.
53. Tribble, G.,, Y. T. Ahn,, J. Lee,, T. Dandekar,, and M. Jayaram. 2000. DNA recognition, strand selectivity and cleavage mode during Integrase family site-specific recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 22255 22267.
54. Voziyanov, Y.,, S. Pathania,, and M. Jayaram. 1999. A general model for site-specific recombination by the integrase family recombinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 930 941.
55. Wigley, D.B. 1998. Teaching a new dog old tricks? Structure 6: 543 548.
56. Xu, C.J., , I. Grainge,, J. Lee,, R.M. Harshey,, and M. Jayaram. 1998. Unveiling two distinct ribonuclease activities and a topoisomerase activity in a site-specific DNA recombinase. Mol. Cell 1: 729 739.
57. Yang, S.H., , and M. Jayaram. 1994. Generality of the shared active site among yeast family site-specific recombinases. The R site-specific recombinase follows the Flp paradigm. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 12789 12796.
58. Yang, S.W., , A.B. Burgin, Jr.,, B.N. Huizenga,, C. A. Robertson,, K.C. Yao,, and H.A. Nash. 1996. A eukaryotic enzyme that can disjoin dead-end covalent complexes between DNA and type I topoisomerases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 11534 11539.
59. Zhu, X. D.,, G. Pan,, K. Luetke,, and P.D. Sadowski. 1995. Homology requirements for ligation and strand exchange by the FLP recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 11646 11653.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error