1887

Chapter 23 : Transposable Elements of Maize

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Transposable Elements of Maize, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817954/9781555812096_Chap23-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817954/9781555812096_Chap23-2.gif

Abstract:

The two-component system is the most aggressive DNA transposon yet characterized. Even PCR strategies based on the most highly conserved sequences of the terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) may not recover all the Mu elements in maize or other species. The two-element system was recovered independently as Cy/rcy; this element system yielded the same high frequency of late somatic excisions as Mutator, but the regulator exhibited near- Mendelian segregation. Autoregulation of the TIR promoters by MuDR encoded products has been assessed by examining TIRB-GUS and TIRB-luciferase expression in Mutator and non-Mutator plants. Effects are weak and may be best explained by the ability of MURA to interfere with host methylation of the promoter regions. Transgenes are also subject to epigenetic silencing, but independently of Mutator silencing. In one’s view, the key to understanding Mutator activities requires elucidating which MuDR-encoded products are necessary and sufficient for each component of somatic and germinal activities. Clarification of which MURA and MURB products are required for somatic insertion and the insertional events in germinal cells will be the foundation for testing models proposed for the control of transposition outcome. If different MUR proteins are required for specific activities, then regulation of protein production and/or localization will be the key research area. On the other hand, if the same MUR proteins conduct all the biochemistry, then their posttranslational modification or the changing contributions of host proteins will be the focus of future analysis.

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23

Key Concept Ranking

Cauliflower mosaic virus
0.42986923
Transcription Start Site
0.41887712
0.42986923
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Figures

Image of Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Structure of and the nonautonomous element. The shared TIRs are shown in black, and the unrelated internal sequences are crosshatched in and open in Arrows above the elements indicate the orientation, length, and position of short, conserved repeats found in some elements. element is composed of two genes, and separated by a repeat-rich intergenic region (hatched box).

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Alignment of the TIRs of the mobile elements. Terminal inverted repeat sequences of the autonomous element are shown on the top. MuDRA is the TIR next to and MuDRB is the TIR next to ; the few mismatches between these TIRs are shown as shadowed letters. The positions of the presumptive CCAAT and TATA boxes and the transcription initiation start sites for both and are indicated with white letters on a black field. In the alignment of TIRs from nonautonomous elements, dots represent matching bases and dashes represent missing bases. Regions with assigned biological function and sequence motifs discussed in the text are boxed.

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Phylogenetic analysis of elements. Unrooted phylograms were generated by using PAUP to estimate relatedness between the virtual translation of hMUR proteins and the -encoded proteins. (Left) N-terminal part of hMURA, including exon 2. (Right) Full-length hMURB proteins and their wild-type counterparts.

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Major transcripts and predicted proteins encoded by (A) Transcriptional units in Heavy arrows depict the exon (filled) and intron (open) organization and direction of transcription of the and genes. Transcription initiates in the terminal inverted repeats of the element,as indicated by bent arrows above the element diagram, and terminates in the intergenic region. The ATG initiation codons discussed in the text are indicated above the diagram for and below the diagram for The position of the stop codon for the longest transcript from each gene is similarly indicated. (B) Major transcripts. Alternative transcription initiation start sites for and alternative splicing of the introns in pre-mRNA for both genes generate a variety of transcripts. (C) Major predicted proteins. Alternative splicing and two possible translation initiation start sites in result in multiple predicted proteins encoded by the known transcripts. MURA proteins contain a region of similarity to bacterial transposases and retroviral integrases,several functional nuclear localization sequences,and a zinc knuckle domain. Alternative splicing results in four predicted MURB proteins encoded by the characterized transcripts of

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
Image of Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Models for developmental timing and outcome of excision. (A) Double-stranded gap repair masks early and germinal excision. Excision of a element results in a double-stranded gap (1). In germinal and early somatic cells (2), which express abundant MURB protein,the gaps that were generated postreplicatively can be repaired by using the copy of the original locus from the sister chromatid. After insertion of the excised element, there is a net increase in the element copy number and restoration of the original insertion site. Evidence of excision is effectively removed. In late somatic cells (3), which express a low amount of MURB, gap repair does not occur, resulting in a measurable excision event. This is true even when the homologous chromosome contains the identical insertion allele. (B) Competition for binding model to explain developmental timing. / elements (1) are accessible for MURA transposase (2). In dividing cells, however, abundant transcriptional factors might assemble on specific motifs in the TIRs (3),potentially displacing transposase or affecting the geometry of the transpososome complex (4). Late in development, these transcriptional factors are depleted (5),allowing assembly of the transpositionally active complex, which results in late excision events (6).

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817954.chap23
1. Alfenito, M. R.,, E., Souer,, C. D. Goodman,, R. Buell,, J. Mol,, R. Koes,, and V. Walbot. 1998. Functional complementation of anthocyanin sequestration in the vacuole by widely divergent glutathione S-transferases. Plant Cell 10:11351149.
2. Alleman, M.,, and M. Freeling. 1986. The Mu transposable elements of maize: evidence for transposition and copy number regulation during development. Genetics 112:107119.
3. Barkan, A.,, and R. A. Martienssen. 1991. Inactivation of maize transposon Mu suppresses a mutant phenotype by activating an outward-reading promoter near the end of Mu1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:35023506.
4. Barker, R. F.,, D. V. Thompson,, D. R. Tablot,, J. Swanson,, and J. L. Bennetzen. 1984. Nucleotide sequence of the maize transposable element Mu1. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 59555967.
5. Bate, N.,, and D. Twell. 1998. Functional architecture of a late pollen promoter: pollen-specific transcription is developmentally regulated by multiple stage-specific and co-dependent activator elements. Plant Mol. Biol. 37:859869.
6. Benito, M.-I.,, and V. Walbot. 1994. The terminal inverted repeat sequences of MuDR are functionally active promoters in maize cells. Maydica 39:255264.
7. Benito, M.-I.,, and V. Walbot. 1997. Characterization of the maize Mutator transposable element MURA transposase as a DNA-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:51655175.
8. Bennetzen, J. L. 1987. Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize. Mol. Gen. Genet. 208:4551.
9. Bennetzen, J. L. 1996. The Mutator transposable element system of maize. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 204:195229.
10. Bennetzen, J. L.,, J. Swanson,, W. C. Taylor,, and M. Freeling. 1984. DNA insertion in the first intron of maize Adh1 affects message levels: Cloning of progenitor and mutant Adh1 alleles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:41254128.
11. Bennetzen, J. L.,, P. S. Springer,, A. D. Cresse,, and M. Hendrickx. 1993. Specificity and regulation of the Mutator transposable element system in maize. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:5795.
12. Bensen, R. J.,, G. S. Johnal,, V. C. Crane,, J. T. Tossberg,, P. S. Schnable,, R. B. Meeley,, and S. P. Briggs. 1995. Cloning and characterization of the maize An1 gene. Plant Cell 7:7584.
13. Brignon, P.,, and N. Chaubet. 1993. Constitutive and celldivision- inducible protein-DNA interactions in two maize histone gene promoters. Plant J. 4:445457.
14. Britt, A. B.,, and V. Walbot. 1991. Germinal and somatic products of excision of Mu1 from the Bronze-1 gene of Zea mays. Mol. Gen. Genet. 227:267276.
15. Chandler, V. L.,, and K. J. Hardeman. 1992. The Mu elements of Zea mays. Adv. Genet. 30:77122.
16. Chandler, V. L.,, and V. Walbot. 1986. DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:17671771.
17. Chandler, V. L.,, C. Rivin,, and V. Walbot. 1986. Stable non- Mutator stocks of maize have sequences homologous to the Mu1 transposable element. Genetics 114:10071021.
18. Chandler, V. L.,, L. E. Talbert,, and F. Raymond. 1988. Sequence, genomic distribution and DNA modification of a Mu1 element from non-Mutator maize stocks. Genetics 119: 951958.
19. Chomet, P.,, D. Lisch,, K. J. Hardeman,, V. L. Chandler,, and M. Freeling. 1991. Identification of a regulatory transposon that controls the Mutator transposable element system in maize. Genetics 129:261270.
20. Chuck, G.,, R. B. Meeley,, and S. Hake. 1998. The control of maize spikelet meristem fate by the APETALA2-like gene indeterminate spikelet1. Genes Dev. 15:11451154.
21.CSHL/WUGSC/PEG Arabidopsis Sequencing Consortium 2000. 2000. The complete sequence of a heterochromatic island from a higher eukaryote. Cell 100:377386.
22. Das, L.,, and R. Martienssen. 1995. Site-selected transposon mutagenesis at the hcf106 locus in maize. Plant Cell 7: 287294.
23. Donlin, M. J.,, D. Lisch,, and M. Freeling. 1995. Tissue-specific accumulation of MURB,a protein encoded by MuDR, the autonomous regulator of the Mutator transposable element family. Plant Cell 7:19892000.
24. Dooner, H. K.,, and E. J. Ralston. 1990. Effect of the Mu1 insertion on intragenic recombination at the bz locus in maize. Maydica 35:333337.
25. Doseff, A.,, R. Martienssen,, and V. Sundaresan. 1991. Somatic excision of the Mu1 transposable element of maize. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:579584.
26. Eisen, J. A.,, M.-I. Benito,, and V. Walbot. 1994. Sequence similarity of putative transposases links the maize Mutator autonomous element and a group of bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:26342636.
27. Engels, W. R.,, D. M. Johnson-Schlitz,, W. B. Eggleston,, and J. Sved. 1990. High-frequency P-element loss in Drosophila is homolog dependent. Cell 62:515525.
28. Eyal, Y.,, C. Curie,, and S. McCormick. 1995. Pollen specificity elements reside in 30 bp of the proximal promoters of two pollen-expressed genes. Plant Cell 7:373384.
29. Fedoroff, N. V., 1989. Maize transposable elements,p. 375411. In D. E. Berg, and M. M. Howe (ed.), Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington,D.C..
30. Fedoroff, N. V.,, and V. Chandler,. 1994. Inactivation of maize transposable elements,p. 349385. In J. Paszkowski (ed.), Homologous Recombination and Gene Silencing in Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers,Amsterdam.
31. Fennoy, S. L.,, and J. Bailey-Serres. 1993. Synonymous codon usage in Zea mays L. nuclear genes is varied by levels of C and G-ending codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:52945300.
32. Fire, A.,, S. Xu,, M. K. Montgomery,, S. A. Kostas,, S. E. Driver,, and C. C. Mello. 1998. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-strandedRNAin Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806811.
33. Fowler, J. E.,, G. J. Muehlbauer,, and M. Freeling. 1996. Mosaic analysis of the ligueless3 mutant phenotype in maize by coordinate suppression of Mutator-insertion alleles. Genetics 143:489503.
34. Fütterer, J.,, and T. Hohn. 1996. Translation in plants: rules and exceptions. Plant Mol. Biol. 32:159189.
35. Girard, L.,, and M. Freeling. 2000. Mutator-suppressible alleles of rough sheath1 and liguleless3 in maize reveal multiple mechanisms of suppression. Genetics 154:437446.
36. Greene, B.,, R. Walko,, and S. Hake. 1994. Mutator insertions in an intron of the maize knotted1 gene result in dominant suppressible mutations. Genetics 138:12751285.
37. Gruenbaum, Y.,, T. Navehamany,, H. Cedar,, and A. Razin. 1981. Sequence specificity of methylation in higher-plant DNA. Nature 292:860862.
38. Gutieacute;rrez-Nava, M.,, C. Warren,, and V. Walbot. 1998. Transcriptionally active MuDR, the regulatory element of the Mutator transposable element family of Zea mays, is present in some accessions of the Mexican land race Zapalote chico. Genetics 149:329346.
39. Hake, S.,, and V. Walbot. 1980. The genome of Zea mays, its organization and homology to related grasses. Chromosoma 79:251270.
40. Hamilton, A. J.,, and D. C. Baulcombe. 1999. A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science 286:950952.
41. Hamilton, D. A.,, Y. H. Schwarz,, and J. P. Mascarenhas. 1998.Amonocot pollen-specific promoter contains separable pollen-specific and quantitative elements. Plant Mol. Biol. 38:663669.
42. Harris, L. J.,, K. Currie,, and V. L. Chandler. 1994. Large tandem duplication associated with a Mu2 insertion in Zea mays B-Peru gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 25:829836.
43. Hershberger, R. J.,, C. A. Warren,, and V. Walbot. 1991. Mutator activity in maize correlates with the presence and expression of the Mu transposable element Mu9. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:1019810202.
44. Hershberger, R. J.,, M.-I. Benito,, K. J. Hardeman,, C. Warren,, V. L. Chandler,, and V. Walbot. 1995. Characterization of the major transcripts encoded by the regulatory MuDR transposable element of maize. Genetics 140:10871098.
45.Hsia, A-P., and P. S. Schnable. 1996. DNA sequence analyses support the role of interrupted gap repair in the origin of internal deletions of the maize transposon, MuDR. Genetics 142:603618.
46. Hua, G.,, N. Yalpanib,, S. P. Briggs,, and G. S. Johal. 1998. A porphyrin pathway impairment is responsible for the pheno type of a dominant disease lesion mimic mutant of maize. Plant Cell 10:10951106.
47. James, M. G.,, M. J. Scanlon,, M. Qin,, D. S. Robertson,, and A. M. Myers. 1993. DNA sequence and transcript analysis of transposon MuA2, a regulator of Mutator transposable element activity in maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 21:11811185.
48. James, M. G.,, and J. Stadler. 1989. Molecular characterization of Mutator systems in maize embryogenic callus cultures indicates Mu element activity in vitro. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77:383393.
49. Jensen, S.,, M.-P. Gassama,, and T. Heidmann. 1999. Cosuppression of transposon activity in Drosophila by I-containing sense and antisense transgenes. Genetics 153:17671774.
50. Joanin, P.,, R. J. Hershberger,, M.-I. Benito,, and V. Walbot. 1997. Sense and antisense transcripts of the maize MuDR regulatory transposon localized by in situ hybridization. Plant Mol. Biol. 33:2336.
51. Jorgensen, R. A.,, Q. D. Que,, and M. Stam. 1999. Do unintended antisense transcripts contribute to sense cosuppression in plants? Trends Genet. 15:1112.
52. Kloeckener-Gruissem, B.,, and M. Freeling. 1995. Transposon- induced promoter scrambling: A mechanism for the evolution of new alleles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:18361840.
53. Le, Q. H.,, S. Wright,, Z. Yu,, and T. Bureau. 2000. Transposon diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:73767381.
54. Levy, A. A.,, A. B. Britt,, K. R. Luehrsen,, V. L. Chandler,, C. Warren,, and V. Walbot. 1989. Developmental and genetic aspects of Mutator excision in maize. Dev. Genet. 10: 520531.
55. Levy, A. A.,, and V. Walbot. 1990. Regulation of the timing of transposable element excision during maize development. Science 248:15341537.
56. Levy, A. A.,, and V. Walbot. 1991. Molecular analysis of the loss of somatic instability in the bz2::mu1 allele of maize. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229:147151.
57. Lisch, D.,, and M. Freeling. 1994. Loss of Mutator activity in a minimal line. Maydica 39:289300.
58. Lisch, D.,, P. Chomet, andM. Freeling. 1995. Genetic characterization of the Mutator system in maize: behavior and regulation of Mu transposons in a minimal line. Genetics 139: 17771796.
58.a. Lisch, D.,, M. Freeling,, R. J. Langham,, and M. Y. Choy. 2001. Mutator transposase is widespread in grasses. Plant Physiol. 125:12931303.
59. Lisch, D.,, L. Girard,, M. Donlin, andM. Freeling. 1999. Functional analysis of deletion derivatives of the maize transposon MuDR delineates roles for the MURA and MURB proteins. Genetics 151:331341.
60. Lowe, B.,, J. Mathern,, and S. Hake. 1992. Active Mutator elements suppress the Knotted phenotype and increase recombination at the Kn1-0 tandem duplication. Genetics 132: 813822.
61. Luehrsen, K. R.,, and V. Walbot. 1990. Insertion of Mu1 elements in the first intron of the Adh1-S gene of maize results in novel RNA processing events. Plant Cell 2:12251238.
62. Martienssen, R. 1996. Epigenetic phenomena: paramutation and gene silencing in plants. Curr. Biol. 6:810813.
63. Martienssen, R., 1996. Epigenetic silencing of Mu transposable elements in maize, p. 593608. In V. E. A. Russo,, R. A. Martienssen,,and A. D. Riggs (ed.), Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview,NY..
64. Martienssen, R.,, A. Barkan,, W. C. Taylor,, and M. Freeling. 1990. Somatically heritable switches in the DNA modification of Mu transposable elements monitored with a suppressible mutant in maize. Genes Dev. 4:331343.
65. Martienssen, R.,, and A. Baron. 1994. Coordinate suppression of mutations caused by Robertson’s Mutator transposons in maize. Genetics 136:11571170.
66. May, E. W.,, and N. L. Craig. 1996. Switching from cut-andpaste to replicative Tn7 transposition. Science 272:401404.
67. McCarty, D. R.,, C. B. Carson,, P. S. Stinard, andD. S. Robertson. 1989. Molecular analysis of Viviparous1: an abscisic acid-insensitive mutant of maize. Plant Cell 1:523532.
68. McDaniel, C. N.,, and R. S. Poethig. 1988. Cell-lineage patterns in the shoot apical meristem of the germinating maize embryo. Planta 175:1322.
69. McLaughlin, M.,, and V. Walbot. 1987. Cloning of a mutable bz2 allele of maize by transposon tagging and differential hybridization. Genetics 117:771776.
70. Mette, M. F.,, J. van der Winden,, M. A. Matzke,, and A. J.M. Matzke. 1999. Production of aberrant promoter transcripts contributes to methylation and silencing of unlinked homologous promoters in trans. EMBO J. 18:241248.
71. Nash, J.,, K. R. Luehrsen,, and V. Walbot. 1990. Bronze-2 gene of maize: reconstruction of a wild-type allele and analysis of transcription and splicing. Plant Cell 2:10391049.
72. Nordborg, M.,, and V. Walbot. 1995. Estimating allelic diversity generated by excision of different transposons types. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:771775.
73. Otto, S. P.,, and V. Walbot. 1990. DNA methylation in eukaryotes: kinetics of demethylation and de novo methylation during the life cycle. Genetics 124:429437.
74. Planckaert, F.,, and V. Walbot. 1989. Molecular and genetic characterization of Mu transposable elements in Zea mays: behavior in callus culture and regenerated plants. Genetics 123:567578.
75. Poethig, R. S.,, E. H. Coe, andM.M. Johri. 1986. Cell lineage patterns in maize embryogenesis: a clonal analysis. Dev. Biol. 117:392404.
76. Qin, M.,, and A. H. Ellingboe. 1990. A transcript identified by MuA of maize is associated with Mutator activity. Mol. Gen. Genet. 224:357363.
77. Qin, M.,, D. S. Robertson,, and A.H. Ellingboe. 1991. Cloning of the Mutator transposable element MuA2, a putative regulator of somatic mutability of the a1-Mum2 allele in maize. Genetics 129:845854.
78. Raizada, M. N. 2000. Altering the Mutator transposon family to study developmental switches and to facilitate functional genomics. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, Calif..
79. Raizada, M. N.,, and V. Walbot. 2000. The late developmental pattern of Mu transposon excision is conferred by a CaMV 35S-driven MURA cDNA in transgenic maize. Plant Cell 12:521.
80. Raizada, M. N.,, M.-I. Benito,, and V. Walbot. 2001. The MuDR transposon terminal inverted repeat contains a complex plant promoter directing distinct somatic and germinal programs. Plant J. 21:7991.
80.a. Raizada, M. N.,, G. Nan,, and V. Walbot. 2001. Transposon biology and gene discovery with RescueMu, a Mu element transgene in maize. Plant Cell 14:123.
81. Raizada, M. N.,, K. V. Brewer,, and V. Walbot. 2001. A maize MuDR transposon promoter shows limited autoregulation. Mol. Gen. Genom. 265:8294.
82. Ratcliff, F.,, B. D. Harrison,, and D. C. Baulcombe. 1997. A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing in plants. Science 276:15581560.
83. Robertson, D. S. 1978. Characterization of a Mutator system in maize. Mutat. Res. 41:2128.
84. Robertson, D. S. 1981. Mutator activity in maize: timing of its activation in ontogeny. Science 213:15151517.
85. Robertson, D. S. 1985. Differential activity of the maize mutator Mu at different loci and in different cell lineages. Mol. Gen. Genet. 200:913.
86. Robertson, D. S. 1986. Genetics studies on the loss of Mu Mutator activity in maize. Genetics 113:765773.
87. Robertson, D. S. 1989. The timing of Mu activity in maize. Genetics 94:969978.
88. Robertson, D. S.,, and P. N. Mascia. 1981. Tests of 4 controlling- element systems of maize for mutator activity and their interaction with Mu mutator. Mutat. Res. 84:283289.
89. Robertson, D. S.,, and P. S. Stinard. 1989. Genetic analyses of putative two-element systems regulating somatic mutability in Mutator-induced aleurone mutants of maize. Dev. Genet. 10:482506.
90. Robertson, D. S.,, and P. S. Stinard. 1992. Genetic regulation of somatic mutability of two Mu-induced a1 mutants of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:225236.
91. Robertson, D. S.,, and P. S. Stinard. 1993. Evidence for Mu activity in the male and female gametophytes of maize. Maydica 38:145150.
91.a. Rudenko, G. N.,, and V. Walbot. 2001. Expression and posttranscriptional regulation of maize transposable element MuDR and its derivatives. Plant Cell 13:553570.
92. Schnable, P. S.,, and P. A. Peterson. 1986. Distribution of genetically active Cy transposable elements among diverse maize lines. Maydica 31:5981.
93. Schnable, P. S.,, and P. A. Peterson. 1988. The Mutator-related Cy transposable element of Zea mays L. behaves as a near-Mendelian factor. Genetics 120:587596.
94. Schnable, P. S.,, and P. A. Peterson. 1989. Genetic evidence of a relationship between two maize transposable element systems: Cy and Mutator. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:317321.
95. Schnable, P. S.,, P. A. Peterson,, and H. Saedler. 1989. The bz-rcy allele of the Cy transposable element system of Zea mays contains a Mu-like element insertion. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217:459473.
95.a. Singer, T.,, C. Yordan,, and R. A. Martienssen. 2001. Robertson’s Mutator transposons in A. thaliana are regulated by the chromatin-remodeling gene Decrease in DNA Methylation (DDM1). Genes Dev. 15:591602.
96. Strommer, J. N.,, S. Hake,, J. Bennetzen,, W. C. Taylor,, and M. Freeling. 1982. Regulatory mutants of the maize Adh1 gene caused by DNA insertions. Nature 300:542544.
97. Sundaresan, V.,, and M. Freeling. 1987. An extrachromosomal form of theMutransposons of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:49244928.
98. Taylor, L.,, and V. Walbot. 1985. A deletion adjacent to a maize transposable element accompanies loss of gene expression. EMBO J. 4:869876.
99. Twell, D.,, J. Yamaguchi,, R. A. Wing,, J. Ushiba,, and S. McCormick. 1991. Promoter analysis of genes that are coordinately expressed during pollen development reveals pollenspecific enhancer sequences and shared regulatory elements. Genes Dev. 5:496507.
100. Vaucheret, H.,, C. Beclin,, T. Elmayan,, F. Feuerbach,, C. Godon,, J.-B. Morel,, P. Mourrain,, J.-C. Palauqui,, and S. Vernhettes. 1998. Transgene-induced gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 16:651659.
101. Veit, B.,, E. Vollbrecht,, J. Mathern,, and S. Hake. 1990. A tandem duplication causes the Kn1-0 allele of Knotted,a dominant morphological mutant of maize. Genetics 125:623632.
102. Walbot, V. 1986. Inheritance of Mutator activity in Zea mays as assayed by somatic instability of the bz2-mu1 allele. Genetics 114:12931312.
103. Walbot, V. 1988. Reactivation of the Mutator transposable element system following gamma irradiation of seed. Mol. Gen.Genet. 212:259264.
104. Walbot, V. 1991. The Mutator transposable element family of maize. Curr. Top. Genet. Eng. 13:137.
105. Walbot, V. 1992. Developmental regulation of excision timing of Mutator transposons of maize: comparison of standard lines and an early excision bz1::mu1 line. Dev. Genet. 13:376386.
106. Walbot, V. 1992. Reactivation of Mutator transposable elements of maize by ultraviolet light. Mol. Gen. Genet. 234:353360.
107. Walbot, V. 1992. Strategies for mutagenesis and gene cloning using transposon tagging and T-DNA insertional mutagenesis. Annu.Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43:4982.
108. Walbot, V. 1999. UV-B damage amplified by transposons in maize. Nature 397:398399.
109. Walbot, V. 2000. Saturation mutagenesis using maize transposons. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3:103107.
110. Walbot, V.,, A. Britt,, K. Luehrsen,, M. McLaughlin,, and C. A. Warren,. 1988. Regulation of mutator activities in maize, p. 121135. In O. E. Nelson,Jr. (ed.), Plant Transposable Elements. Plenum Press, New York,N.Y..
111. Walbot, V.,, and C. Warren. 1988. Regulation of Mu element copy number in maize lines with an active or inactive Mutator transposable element system. Mol. Gen. Genet. 211:2734.
112. Walbot, V.,, and A. Stapleton. 1998. Reactivation potential of epigenetically inactive Mu transposable elements of Zea mays L. decreases in successive generations. Maydica 43:183193.
113. Wasseneger, M.,, S. Heimes,, L. Riedel,, and H. L. Sanger. 1994. RNA-directed de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell 76:567576.
114. Waterhouse, P. M.,, M. W. Graham,, and M.-B. Wang. 1998. Virus resistance and gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense and antisense RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1395913964.
115. Wessler, S.,, A. Tarpley,, M. Purugganan,, M. Spell,, and R. Okagaki. 1990. Filler DNA is associated with spontaneous deletions in maize. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:87318735.
116. Wolffe, A. P.,, and M. A. Matzke. 1999. Epigenetics: regulation through repression. Science 286:481486.
117. Yamashita, S.,, T. Takano-Shimizu,, K. Kitamura,, T. Mikami,, and Y. Kishima. 1999. Resistance to gap repair of the transposon Tam3 in Anthirrhinum majus: a role of the end regions. Genetics 153:18991908.
118. Zhao, Z. Y., andV. Sundaresan. 1991. Binding sites for maize nuclear proteins in the terminal inverted repeats of the Mu1 transposable element. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229:1726.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table 1.

Characteristics of elements

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Generic image for table
Table 2.

Summary of sequence differences between and -encoded genes

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23
Generic image for table
Table 3.

Large predicted protein products

Citation: Walbot V, Rudenko G. 2002. Transposable Elements of Maize, p 533-564. In Craig N, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz A (ed), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817954.ch23

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error