1887

Chapter 14 : Postmortem Blood Culture

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Ebook: Choose a downloadable PDF or ePub file. Chapter is a downloadable PDF file. File must be downloaded within 48 hours of purchase

Buy this Chapter
Digital (?) $15.00

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Postmortem Blood Culture, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555819828/9781555819811_Chap14-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555819828/9781555819811_Chap14-2.gif

Abstract:

Autopsy has historically played a critical role in our understanding of normal anatomy, disease and treatment efficacies, or adverse effects of medications. Despite the importance of autopsy as a teaching tool, it is now limited to an ancillary role in modern medical education ( ). This effect may continue to be amplified as physicians who did not observe autopsies during their training are less likely to request an autopsy later on in the course of their careers ( ). In the 1970s, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) eliminated the requirement for a minimum autopsy rate from its accreditation process, and Medicare stopped reimbursing for autopsies in 1986 ( ). Reasons physicians do not request an autopsy have reportedly included trepidation regarding the lack of training on how to seek autopsy permission, fear of offending the family, and fear of malpractice litigation. In addition, confidence in contemporary diagnostic technology and the ever present desire to reduce health care spending have also been cited as reasons ( ). Given the forces aligned against this procedure, autopsy rates have declined in the United States and other Western countries over the past 3 decades ( ). Unfortunately, the sequelae of this decline include the loss of an established teaching tool along with the inability to identify and correct clinical errors and missed diagnoses ( ).

Citation: Chamberland R, Deetz C. 2017. Postmortem Blood Culture, p 297-308. In Dunne, Jr. W, Burnham C (ed), The Dark Art of Blood Cultures. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555819811.ch14
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555819828.chap14
1. Horowitz RE,, Naritoku WY. 2007. The autopsy as a performance measure and teaching tool. Hum Pathol 38:688695.
2. Stolman CJ,, Castello F,, Yorio M,, Mautone S. 1994. Attitudes of pediatricians and pediatric residents toward obtaining permission for autopsy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148:843847.
3. Shojania KG,, Burton EC. 2008. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med 358:873875.
4. Xiao J,, Krueger GR,, Buja LM,, Covinsky M. 2009. The impact of declining clinical autopsy: need for revised healthcare policy. Am J Med Sci 337:4146.
5. Peacock SJ,, Machin D,, Duboulay CE,, Kirkham N. 1988. The autopsy: a useful tool or an old relic? J Pathol 156:914.
6. Cottreau C,, McIntyre L,, Favara BE. 1989. Professional attitudes toward the autopsy. A survey of clinicians and pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol 92:673676.
7. Karunaratne S,, Benbow EW. 1997. A survey of general practitioners’ views on autopsy reports. J Clin Pathol 50:548552.
8. Start RD,, McCulloch TA,, Silcocks PB,, Cotton WK. 1994. Attitudes of senior pathologists towards the autopsy. J Pathol 172:8184.
9. Grunberg SM,, Sherrod A,, Muellenbach R,, Renshaw M,, Zaretsky S,, Levine AM. 1994. Analysis of physician attitudes concerning requests for autopsy. Cancer Invest 12:463468.
10. Gibson TN,, Shirley SE,, Escoffery CT,, Reid M. 2004. Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies. J Clin Pathol 57:980985.
11. Goldman L,, Sayson R,, Robbins S,, Cohn LH,, Bettmann M,, Weisberg M. 1983. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:10001005.
12. Shojania KG,, Burton EC,, McDonald KM,, Goldman L. 2003. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 289:28492856.
13. Wilson SJ,, Wilson ML,, Reller LB. 1993. Diagnostic utility of postmortem blood cultures. Arch Pathol Lab Med 117:986988.
14. Koneman EW,, Davis MA. 1974. Postmortem bacteriology. 3. Clinical significance of microorganisms recovered at autopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 61:2840.
15. Lobmaier IV,, Vege A,, Gaustad P,, Rognum TO. 2009. Bacteriological investigation—significance of time lapse after death. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:11911198.
16. Saegeman V,, Cohen MC,, Alberola J,, Ziyade N,, Farina C,, ESCMID Study Group for Forensic and Postmortem Microbiology, Cornaglia G,, Fernandez-Rodríguez A. 24 February 2017. How is post-mortem microbiology appraised by pathologists? Results from a practice survey conducted by ESGFOR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis doi:10.1007/s10096-017-2943-6.
17. Morris JA,, Harrison LM,, Partridge SM. 2007. Practical and theoretical aspects of postmortem bacteriology. Curr Diagn Pathol 13:6574.
18. Carpenter HM,, Wilkins RM. 1964. Autopsy bacteriology: review of 2,033 cases. Arch Pathol 77:7381.
19. Weber MA,, Hartley JC,, Brooke I,, Lock PE,, Klein NJ,, Malone M,, Sebire NJ. 2010. Post-mortem interval and bacteriological culture yield in sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI). Forensic Sci Int 198:121125.
20. Dolan CT,, Brown AL Jr,, Ritts RE Jr. 1971. Microbiological examination of postmortem tissues. Arch Pathol 92:206211.
21. Wise R. 1976. The ‘septic spleen’—a critical evaluation. J Clin Pathol 29:228230.
22. Morris JA,, Harrison LM,, Partridge SM. 2006. Postmortem bacteriology: a re-evaluation. J Clin Pathol 59:19.
23. de Jongh DS,, Loftis JW,, Green GS,, Shively JA,, Minckler TM. 1968. Postmortem bacteriology: a practical method for routine use. Am J Clin Pathol 49:424428.
24. Reznicek MJ,, Koontz FP,. 2002. Autopsy microbiology, p 12561265. In McClatchey KD (ed), Clinical Laboratory Medicine, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
25. Prtak L,, Al-Adnani M,, Fenton P,, Kudesia G,, Cohen MC. 2010. Contribution of bacteriology and virology in sudden unexpected death in infancy. Arch Dis Child 95:371376.
26. Brooks EG,, Gill JR,, Buchsbaum R,, Utley S,, Sathyavagiswaran L,, Peterson DC, National Association of Medical Examiners NAME Ad Hoc Committee for Bioterrorism and Infectious Disease. 2015. Testing for infectious diseases in sudden unexpected infant death: a survey of medical examiner and coroner offices in the United States. J Pediatr 167:17882.e1.
27. Taylor CA,, Holman RC,, Callinan LS,, Zaki SR,, Blau DM. 2013. Unexplained death due to possible infectious diseases in infants-United States, 2006. J Pediatr 162:195201.e3.
28. Morentin B,, Suárez-Mier MP,, Aguilera B,, Arrieta J,, Audicana C,, Fernández-Rodríguez A. 2012. Clinicopathological features of sudden unexpected infectious death: population-based study in children and young adults. Forensic Sci Int 220:8084.
29. Fernández-Rodríguez A,, Cohen MC,, Lucena J,, Van de Voorde W,, Angelini A,, Ziyade N,, Saegeman V. 2015. How to optimise the yield of forensic and clinical post-mortem microbiology with an adequate sampling: a proposal for standardisation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:10451057.
30. Waters BL. 2009. Handbook of Autopsy Practice, 4th ed. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
31. Sunagawa K,, Sugitani M. 2017. Post-mortem detection of bacteremia using pairs of blood culture samples. Leg Med (Tokyo) 24:9297.
32. Bates DW,, Lee TH. 1992. Rapid classification of positive blood cultures. Prospective validation of a multivariate algorithm. JAMA 267:19621966.
33. Weinstein MP,, Towns ML,, Quartey SM,, Mirrett S,, Reimer LG,, Parmigiani G,, Reller LB. 1997. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 24:584602.
34. Weinstein MP. 2003. Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol 41:22752278.
35. Palmiere C,, Egger C,, Prod’Hom G,, Greub G. 2016. Bacterial translocation and sample contamination in postmortem microbiological analyses. J Forensic Sci 61:367374.
36. Emmadi R,, Boonyaratanakornkit JB,, Selvarangan R,, Shyamala V,, Zimmer BL,, Williams L,, Bryant B,, Schutzbank T,, Schoonmaker MM,, Amos Wilson JA,, Hall L,, Pancholi P,, Bernard K. 2011. Molecular methods and platforms for infectious diseases testing a review of FDA-approved and cleared assays. J Mol Diagn 13:583604.
37. Sontakke S,, Cadenas MB,, Maggi RG,, Diniz PP,, Breitschwerdt EB. 2009. Use of broad range 16S rDNA PCR in clinical microbiology. J Microbiol Methods 76:217225.
38. Skvarc M,, Stubljar D,, Rogina P,, Kaasch AJ. 2013. Non-culture-based methods to diagnose bloodstream infection: does it work? Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 3:97104.
39. Baron EJ,, Miller JM,, Weinstein MP,, Richter SS,, Gilligan PH,, Thomson RB Jr,, Bourbeau P,, Carroll KC,, Kehl SC,, Dunne WM,, Robinson-Dunn B,, Schwartzman JD,, Chapin KC,, Snyder JW,, Forbes BA,, Patel R,, Rosenblatt JE,, Pritt BS. 2013. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2013 recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)(a). Clin Infect Dis 57:e22e121.
40. Hill RB,, Anderson RE. 1988. The Autopsy: Medical Practice and Public Policy. Butterworths, Boston, MA.
41. Mazuchowski EL II,, Meier PA. 2005. The modern autopsy: what to do if infection is suspected. Arch Med Res 36:713723.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error