1887

Using Computer Technology to Foster Learning for Understanding

    Authors: ELAINE VAN MELLE1,*, LEWIS TOMALTY2
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Education and; 2: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen’s University at Kingston, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7M 3G7
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • *Corresponding author. Phone: (613) 545-9441. E-mail: [email protected].
    • Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2000 vol. 1 no. 1 7-13. doi:10.1128/154288100X14285805587224
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • HTML
    68.47 Kb
  • PDF
    88.22 Kb
  • XML

    Abstract:

    The literature shows that students typically use either a surface approach to learning, in which the emphasis is on memorization of facts, or a deep approach to learning, in which learning for understanding is the primary focus. This paper describes how computer technology, specifically the use of a multimedia CD-ROM, was integrated into a microbiology curriculum as part of the transition from focusing on facts to fostering learning for understanding. Evaluation of the changes in approaches to learning over the course of the term showed a statistically significant shift in a deep approach to learning, as measured by the Study Process Questionnaire. Additional data collected showed that the use of computer technology supported this shift by providing students with the opportunity to apply what they had learned in class to order tests and interpret the test results in relation to specific patient-focused case studies. The extent of the impact, however, varied among different groups of students in the class. For example, students who were recent high school graduates did not show a statistically significant increase in deep learning scores over the course of the term and did not perform as well in the course. The results also showed that a surface approach to learning was an important aspect of learning for understanding, although only those students who were able to combine a surface with a deep approach to learning were successfully able to learn for understanding. Implications of this finding for the future use of computer technology and learning for understanding are considered.

Key Concept Ranking

Skin
0.4912871
Viruses
0.47548875
Elements
0.4353615
0.4912871

References & Citations

1. Andrews J, Garrison DR, Magnusson K 1996 The teaching and learning transaction in higher education: a study of excellent professors and their students Teaching Higher Educ 1 81 103 10.1080/1356251960010107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251960010107
2. Biggs JB 1999 Teaching for quality learning at university The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham, London, England
3. Biggs JB 1993 What do inventories of student’s learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification Educ Psychol 63 3 19
4. Biggs JB 1987 Study process questionnaire manual Australian Council for Educational Research Melbourne, Australia
5. Biggs JB, Collis KF 1982 Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy Academic Press Inc New York, N.Y.
6. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR 1999 How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school National Academy Press Washington, D.C.
7. Bruer JT 1997 Schools for thought: a science of learning in the classroom The MIT Press Cambridge, Mass
8. Cannon R April 13 1999 Personal communication
9. Clark RE 1994 Media will never influence learning Educ Technol Res Dev 42 21 29 10.1007/BF02299088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088
10. Dillon A, Gabbard R 1998 Hypermedia as an educational technology: a review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style Rev Educ Res 68 322 349
11. Ehrmann SC 1995 Asking the right questions: what does research tell us about technology and higher learning? Change March/April 20 27 10.1080/00091383.1995.9937734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.9937734
12. Franz J, Ferreira L, Loh H, Pendergast D, Service M, Stormont D, Taylor L, Thambiratnam D, Williamson B 1996 Students’ and lecturers’ conceptions of learning in context: an interdisciplinary study Teaching Higher Educ 1 325 339 10.1080/1356251960010304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251960010304
13. Gow L, Kember D 1993 Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning Br J Educ Psychol 63 20 33 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x
14. Grasha AF 1996 Teaching with style Alliance Publishers Pittsburgh, Pa.
15. Hamel J, Dufour S, Fortin D 1993 Case study methods Sage Publications Newbury Park, London, England
16. Jacobson MJ 1994 Issues in hypertext and hypermedia research: toward a framework for linking theory to design J Educ Media Hypermedia 3 141 154
17. Jacobson MJ, Spiro RJ 1995 Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: an empirical investigation J Educ Comput Res 12 301 333 10.2190/4T1B-HBP0-3F7E-J4PN http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/4T1B-HBP0-3F7E-J4PN
18. Jacobson MJ, Spiro RJ 1994 A framework for the contextual analysis of technology-based learning environments J Comput Higher Educ 5 3 32 10.1007/BF02948569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02948569
19. Jonassen DH, Wang S 1993 Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext J. Computer-Based Instruct. 20 1 8
20. Kember D, Gow L 1989 A model of student approaches to learning encompassing ways to influence and change approaches Instruct Sci 18 263 288 10.1007/BF00118014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00118014
21. Kember D, McKay J 1996 Action research into the quality of student learning J Higher Educ 67 528 554 10.2307/2943867 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2943867
22. Mandinach EB, Cline HF 1996 Classroom dynamics: the impact of a technology-based curriculum innovation on teaching and learning J Educ Comput Res 14 83 102 10.2190/9MH6-LB76-7EF5-C43M http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/9MH6-LB76-7EF5-C43M
23. Marton F, Saljo R 1976 On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 46 4 11 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
24. Marton F, Saljo R 1976 On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 46 115 127 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
25. Prosser M, Trigwell K 1999 Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham, London, England
26. Ramsden P, Entwhistle NJ 1981 Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to learning Br J Educ Psychol 54 73 83
27. Reil M 1989 The impact of computers in classrooms J Res Comput Educ 22 180 190
28. Ruberg LF, Moore DM, Taylor CD 1996 Student participation, interaction and regulation in a computer-mediated communication environment: a qualitative study J Educ Comput Res 14 243 268 10.2190/7PPF-FQBJ-1RJM-CACT http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/7PPF-FQBJ-1RJM-CACT
29. Rubin H, Rubin I 1995 Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data Sage Publishing Thousand Oaks, Calif
30. Yin RK 1994 Case study research: design and methods Sage Publishing Thousand Oaks, Calif

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/154288100X14285805587224
2000-05-01
2019-01-21

Abstract:

The literature shows that students typically use either a surface approach to learning, in which the emphasis is on memorization of facts, or a deep approach to learning, in which learning for understanding is the primary focus. This paper describes how computer technology, specifically the use of a multimedia CD-ROM, was integrated into a microbiology curriculum as part of the transition from focusing on facts to fostering learning for understanding. Evaluation of the changes in approaches to learning over the course of the term showed a statistically significant shift in a deep approach to learning, as measured by the Study Process Questionnaire. Additional data collected showed that the use of computer technology supported this shift by providing students with the opportunity to apply what they had learned in class to order tests and interpret the test results in relation to specific patient-focused case studies. The extent of the impact, however, varied among different groups of students in the class. For example, students who were recent high school graduates did not show a statistically significant increase in deep learning scores over the course of the term and did not perform as well in the course. The results also showed that a surface approach to learning was an important aspect of learning for understanding, although only those students who were able to combine a surface with a deep approach to learning were successfully able to learn for understanding. Implications of this finding for the future use of computer technology and learning for understanding are considered.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/1/1/jmbe-1-1-7.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/154288100X14285805587224&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Figures

Image of FIG. 1

Click to view

FIG. 1

is a multimedia CD-ROM in which case studies are organized according to body systems.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2000 vol. 1 no. 1 7-13. doi:10.1128/154288100X14285805587224
Download as Powerpoint
Image of FIG. 2

Click to view

FIG. 2

Histograms of SPQ deep score results at the beginning of the term (SPQ1) (a) and at the end of the term (SPQ2) (b).

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2000 vol. 1 no. 1 7-13. doi:10.1128/154288100X14285805587224
Download as Powerpoint

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error