1887

Development and Evaluation of an Electronic Guide for Introductory Microbiology Skills

    Authors: ALICE WRIGHT1,*, ETHELYNDA E. HARDING1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: College of Science and Mathematics, Department of Biology, California State University–Fresno, Fresno, California 93740-8034
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: College of Science and Mathematics, Department of Biology, 2555 E. San Ramon Avenue M/S SB73, Fresno, CA 93740-8034. Phone: (559) 278-7692. Fax: (559) 278-3963. E-mail: awright@csufresno.edu.
    • Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2005 vol. 6 no. 1 28-35. doi:10.1128/154288105X14285806557005
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • PDF
    173.40 Kb
  • HTML
    41.46 Kb
  • XML

    Abstract:

    To increase the quality of instruction, enhance student learning, and decrease laboratory time spent on laboratory safety, basic skills, and the use of equipment, we developed the Micro eGuide website. We compared the performance of students who used the Micro eGuide to students provided more traditional instruction in both an upper-level introductory microbiology course for biology majors and in a lower-division introductory microbiology course for nonmajors. Assessment of student learning included written pretests and posttests, practical testing of laboratory skills, and for the major’s class, a review of poster presentations of independent projects. Students who used the Micro eGuide showed a statistically significant increase in performance on written examination in the introductory microbiology courses for both biology majors and nonmajors. Use of the Micro eGuide in the sophomore-level course for nonbiology majors resulted in a statistically significant improvement in laboratory skills. Though the increase in laboratory skills in the majors courses was not statistically significant, instructors were able to use the site as an effective learning source and decrease the time spent in class on topics covered in the Micro eGuide. While the number of student independent research projects was too small for statistical analysis on the quality of the poster presentations, the improvement in student attitude and the increase in the diversity in topics selected suggests that students using the Micro eGuide had increased comfort with microbiology and increased interest in exploring microbiology.

Key Concept Ranking

Bunsen Burner
0.49017313
0.49017313

References & Citations

1. Backer PA, Yabu JK1994Hypermedia as an instructional resource230253D F. H. A. AssociatesChanging college classroomsJossey-Bass PublishersSan Francisco
2. Covington MV1997A motivational analysis of academic life in college61100 Perry RP, Smart JCEffective teaching in higher education: research and practiceAgathon PressNew York
3. Deutch CE1994Restructuring a general microbiology laboratory into an investigative experienceAm Biol Teacher56529429610.2307/4449824 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4449824
4. Hake RR1998Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics coursesAm. J. Phys66647410.1119/1.18809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
5. Handleson J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, Bruns P, Chang A, DeHaan R, Gentile J, Lauffer S, Stewart J, Tilghman SM, Wood WB2004Scientific teachingScience304521522
6. Lazarowitz R, Tamir P1994Research on using laboratory instruction in science94128 Gabel DLHandbook of research on science teaching and learningMacMillan Publishing CompanyNew York
7. Strong M, Cascio D, Eisenberg D2004A web-based comparative genomics tutorial for investigating microbial genomesMicrobiol Educ53035
8. Sundberg MD, Moncada GJ1994Creating effective investigative laboratories for undergraduatesBioScience141069870410.2307/1312513 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1312513
9. Walvoord BE, Anderson VJ1998Effective grading A tool for learning and assessmentJossey-Bass PublishersSan Francisco
154288105X14285806557005.citations
jmbe/6/1
content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/154288105X14285806557005
Loading

Citations loading...

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/154288105X14285806557005
2005-05-01
2017-09-25

Abstract:

To increase the quality of instruction, enhance student learning, and decrease laboratory time spent on laboratory safety, basic skills, and the use of equipment, we developed the Micro eGuide website. We compared the performance of students who used the Micro eGuide to students provided more traditional instruction in both an upper-level introductory microbiology course for biology majors and in a lower-division introductory microbiology course for nonmajors. Assessment of student learning included written pretests and posttests, practical testing of laboratory skills, and for the major’s class, a review of poster presentations of independent projects. Students who used the Micro eGuide showed a statistically significant increase in performance on written examination in the introductory microbiology courses for both biology majors and nonmajors. Use of the Micro eGuide in the sophomore-level course for nonbiology majors resulted in a statistically significant improvement in laboratory skills. Though the increase in laboratory skills in the majors courses was not statistically significant, instructors were able to use the site as an effective learning source and decrease the time spent in class on topics covered in the Micro eGuide. While the number of student independent research projects was too small for statistical analysis on the quality of the poster presentations, the improvement in student attitude and the increase in the diversity in topics selected suggests that students using the Micro eGuide had increased comfort with microbiology and increased interest in exploring microbiology.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/6/1/jmbe-6-1-28.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/154288105X14285806557005&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Figures

Image of FIG. 1

Click to view

FIG. 1

Graphic table of contents for the laboratory equipment section of the Micro eGuide. The Microscope subheading is expanded. On the website, selection of any of the above squares opens a content page or menu of pages associated with the topic. Similar subheadings are available under Laboratory Safety and Laboratory Skills.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2005 vol. 6 no. 1 28-35. doi:10.1128/154288105X14285806557005
Download as Powerpoint
Image of FIG. 2

Click to view

FIG. 2

Pre- and posttest given to students in the major’s introductory microbiology course. Students were to indicate if the statement was true or false.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2005 vol. 6 no. 1 28-35. doi:10.1128/154288105X14285806557005
Download as Powerpoint
Image of FIG. 3

Click to view

FIG. 3

Checklist used to assess the streak plate and work area preparation practical examination. Observers were to select the behavior they observed from the choices written. Each correct action scored one point; 28 points were possible. If students did something that was not listed, observers were to write the observation in the page margin for interpretation by the instructor.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2005 vol. 6 no. 1 28-35. doi:10.1128/154288105X14285806557005
Download as Powerpoint

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error