1887

Designing Cancer-Killing Artificial Viruses to Improve Student Understanding of Microbiology

    Authors: Andy Kuniyuki1,*, Gwen Sharp2
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Dean, School of Liberal Arts & Sciences; 2: Department of Social Sciences, Nevada State College, Henderson, NV 89002
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 01 December 2011
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Liberal Arts and Sciences Nevada State College, 1021 E. Paradise Hills Drive, Henderson, NV 89002. Phone: (702) 992-2615. Fax: (702) 992-2601. E-mail: andy.kuniyuki@nsc.nevada.edu.
    • Copyright © 2011 American Society for Microbiology
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. December 2011 vol. 12 no. 2 135-142. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.250
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • XML
  • PDF
    439.39 Kb
  • HTML
    57.78 Kb

    Abstract:

    Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of a “learning by designing” group project used in a lower-division Microbiology course. Students used knowledge gained from the course to design an artificial virus that would kill cancer cells. The assignment required groups to integrate the individual course topics into a unified, complex understanding of the field of microbiology. Throughout the course, students and the instructor collaborated in creating a rubric to evaluate the groups’ final presentations. This paper reports the results of an assessment of the project by comparing the instructor’s and the students’ scores for the presentations. Students’ and the instructor’s scores were correlated; the Pearson coefficient of 0.52 was statistically significant. The results indicate that students gained sufficient knowledge to accurately evaluate proposed designs. Additionally, the overall course grade distribution improved compared to the semester before the project was introduced. Finally, in order to engage students in thinking about their own learning process, they completed a reflection assignment that required them to discuss the changes in their understanding of microbiology over the course of the semester. Our assessment indicates that a design project can serve as an effective and useful learning technique in undergraduate Microbiology courses, though modifications are suggested.

Key Concept Ranking

Double-Stranded RNA
0.49351248
Immune Response
0.41179833
0.49351248

References & Citations

1. Applefield J, Huber R, Moallem M2000Constructivism in theory and practice: toward a better understandingThe High School Journal.843553
2. Billington H1997Poster presentations and peer assessment: novel forms of evaluation and assessmentJ. Biol. Edu.3121822010.1080/00219266.1997.9655566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1997.9655566
3. Bloom B, Hastings J, Madaus G1971Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learningMcGraw-HillNew York, NY
4. Blumenfeld P, Marx R, Soloway E, Krajcik J1996Learning with peers: from small group cooperation to collaborative communitiesEducational Researcher.253740
5. Bonwell C, Eison JActive Learning: Creating Excitement in the ClassroomASHE-ERIC; 1991 Higher Education Report No.: 1George Washington UniversityWashington, D.C209210363046890
6. Bonwell C, Southerland T1996The active learning continuum: choosing activities to engage students in the classroomNew Directions for Teaching and Learning6731610.1002/tl.37219966704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966704
7. Bringle R, Hatcher J1999Reflection in service learning: making meaning of experienceEducational Horizons.77179185
8. Cheng W, Warren M1999Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group projectAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education2430131410.1080/0260293990240304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240304
9. Collins A, Brown J, Holum A1991Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visibleAmerican Educator.156113846
10. DeNeve K, Heppner M1997Role play simulations: the assessment of an active learning technique and comparisons with traditional lecturesInnovative Higher Education.2123124610.1007/BF01243718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01243718
11. Eppink J2002Student-created rubrics: an idea that worksTeaching Music.92832
12. Eyler J2002Reflection: linking service and learning—linking students and communitiesJ. Social Issues.5851753410.1111/1540-4560.00274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00274
13. Falchikov N, Goldfinch N2000Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marksReview of Educational Research70287322
14. Fekete A, Kay J, Kingston J, Wimalaratne K2000Supporting reflection in introductory computer scienceACM-SIGCSE Bulletin3214414810.1145/331795.331844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/331795.331844
15. Freeman M1995Peer assessment by groups of group workAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education2028930110.1080/0260293950200305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293950200305
16. Gueldenzoph L, May G2002Collaborative peer evaluation: best practices for group member assessmentsBusiness Communication Quarterly.6592010.1177/108056990206500102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108056990206500102
17. Huffman E1998Authentic rubricsArt Education.51646810.2307/3216187 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3216187
18. Janssen F, Tigelaar D, Verloop N2009Developing biology lessons aimed at teaching for understanding: a domain-specific heuristic for student teachersJ. Science Teacher Education.2012010.1007/s10972-008-9118-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9118-3
19. Janssen F, Waarlo A2010Learning biology by designingJ. Biological Education.44889210.1080/00219266.2010.9656199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656199
20. Kitchen E, King S, Robison D, Sudweeks R, Bradshaw W, Bell J2006Rethinking exams and letter grades: how much can teachers delegate to students?CBE Life Sci Educ.527028010.1187/cbe.05-11-0123170122191618686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-11-0123
21. Koliba C2004Assessing reflection assignments for public affairs courses: implications for educating reflective practitionersJ. Public Affairs Education.10295309
22. Kvam P2000The effect of active learning methods on student retention in engineering statisticsAmerican Statistician.54136140
23. Lim Y, Lee E, Yoon Y, Lee M, Lee M2008Filamentous artificial virus from a self-assembled discrete nanoribbonAngewandte Chemie1204601460410.1002/ange.200800266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ange.200800266
24. McClanahan E, McClanahan L2002Active learning in a non-majors biology class: lessons learnedCollege Teaching.50929610.1080/87567550209595884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595884
25. Meyers C, Jones T1993Promoting active learning: strategies for the college classroomJossey-BassSan Francisco, CA
26. Orsmond P, Merry S1996The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessmentAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education2123925110.1080/0260293960210304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210304
27. Prince M2004Does active learning work? A review of the literatureJ. Engr. Education.93223231
28. Reuse-Durham N2005Peer evaluation as an active learning techniqueJ. Instructional Psychology.32328345
29. Richardson G, Maltby H1995Reflection-on-practice: enhancing student learningJ. Adv Nurs.2223524210.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020235.x7593942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020235.x
30. Rubin L, Hebert C1998Model for active learning: collaborative peer teachingCollege Teaching.46263010.1080/87567559809596229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567559809596229
31. Scannapieco F1997Formal debate: an active learning strategyJ. Dent. Educ.61955961
32. Skillings M, Ferrell R2000Student-generated rubrics: bringing students into the assessment processThe Reading Teacher.53452455
33. Stephens K, Winterbottom M2010Using a learning log to support students’ learning in biology lessonsJ. Biol. Edu.44728010.1080/00219266.2010.9656197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656197
34. Varner D, Peck S2003Learning from learning journals: the benefits and challenges of using learning journal assignmentsJ. Management Edu.27527710.1177/1052562902239248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562902239248
35. Wolf K, Stevens E2007The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learningJ. of Effective Teaching7314
jmbe.v12i2.250.citations
jmbe/12/2
content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.250
Loading

Citations loading...

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.250
2011-12-01
2017-06-28

Abstract:

Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of a “learning by designing” group project used in a lower-division Microbiology course. Students used knowledge gained from the course to design an artificial virus that would kill cancer cells. The assignment required groups to integrate the individual course topics into a unified, complex understanding of the field of microbiology. Throughout the course, students and the instructor collaborated in creating a rubric to evaluate the groups’ final presentations. This paper reports the results of an assessment of the project by comparing the instructor’s and the students’ scores for the presentations. Students’ and the instructor’s scores were correlated; the Pearson coefficient of 0.52 was statistically significant. The results indicate that students gained sufficient knowledge to accurately evaluate proposed designs. Additionally, the overall course grade distribution improved compared to the semester before the project was introduced. Finally, in order to engage students in thinking about their own learning process, they completed a reflection assignment that required them to discuss the changes in their understanding of microbiology over the course of the semester. Our assessment indicates that a design project can serve as an effective and useful learning technique in undergraduate Microbiology courses, though modifications are suggested.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/12/2/jmbe-12-2-135.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.250&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Figures

Image of FIG. 1

Click to view

FIG. 1

Correlation between instructor’s ratings and students’ ratings.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. December 2011 vol. 12 no. 2 135-142. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.250
Download as Powerpoint

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error