1887

The Development of Curricular Guidelines for Introductory Microbiology that Focus on Understanding

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • XML
    0.00 Kb
  • PDF
    176.77 Kb
  • HTML
    48.14 Kb
Add to My Favorites
    Authors: Susan Merkel1,*, the ASM Task Force on Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Microbiology1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: MS Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-5701
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 03 May 2012
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: MS Microbiology, 111 Wing Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-5701. Phone: 607-254-2767. Fax: 607-255-3904. E-mail: smm3@cornell.edu.
    • Copyright © 2012 American Society for Microbiology
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2012 vol. 13 no. 1 32-38. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363

    Abstract:

    The number of students who leave majors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) due to a perception that courses are poorly taught is evidence that education reform in STEM is overdue. Despite decades of research that argues for student-centered teaching approaches, most introductory STEM courses are still taught in the large lecture format, focusing on rote memorization. While individual efforts in STEM educational reform are important, solutions will most certainly need to include institutional and cultural change. In biology, numerous national reports have called for educational reform to better prepare future scientists. We describe here a new, concept-based curriculum for Introductory Microbiology courses, designed to promote deep understanding of core concepts. Supported by the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) and based on the overarching concepts and competencies presented in the AAAS/NSF report , we hope it will empower instructors to adapt student-centered approaches so that students in Introductory Microbiology courses can leave the course with a core set of enduring understandings of microbiology.

Key Concept Ranking

Horizontal Gene Transfer
0.45335406
0.45335406

References & Citations

1. AAAS2010Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to actionA report of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciencehttp://visionandchange.org/
2. American Society for Microbiology2010MicrobeLibraryhttp://www.microbelibrary.org/
3. American Society for Microbiology2002ASM curriculum resources and publicationshttp://forms.asm.org/Education/index.asp?bid=1229
4. Anderson WA, et al2011Science education: changing the culture of science education at research universitiesScience33115215310.1126/science.119828021233371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1198280
5. Association of American Medical Colleges and Howard Hughes Medical Institute2009Scientific foundations for future physicians: report of the AAMC-HHMI Committeewww.hhmi.org/grants/pdf/08-209_AAMC-HHMI_report.pdf
6. Association of American Universities2011Five-year initiative for improving undergraduate STEM education [discussion draft]www.aau.edu/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=12592220237263224195
7. Chang A2011A retrospective look at 20 years of ASM education programs (1990–2010) and a prospective look at the next 20 years (2011–2030)JMBE12812http://jmbe.asm.org/index.php/jmbe/article/view/25310.1128/jmbe.v12i1.253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.253
8. Cheesman K, French D, Cheesman I, Swails N, Thomas J2007Is there any common curriculum for undergraduate Biology majors in the 21st century?Bioscience5751610.1641/B570609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/B570609
9. Dancy MH, Smith JC, Henderson C2008Barriers and promises in STEM reform [commissioned paper for national academies of science workshop on linking evidence and promising practices in STEM undergraduate education]http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Dancy_Henderson_CommissionedPaper.pdf190585921743394
10. Fairweather J2008Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: a status reporthttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html191139952329830
11. Ferrini-Mundy J, Gucler B2009Discipline-based efforts to enhance undergraduate STEM educationNew Directions For Teaching And LearningSpring2009556710.1002/tl.344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.344
12. Fox MA, Hackerman N2003Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematicsNational Academies PressWashington, DChttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=030907277814699431174313
13. Froyd J2008White paper on promising practices in undergraduate STEM educat ionhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html
14. Gregory E, Ellis J, Orenstein A2011A proposal for a common minimal topic set in introductory biology courses for majorsAm Biol Teacher.73162110.1525/abt.2011.73.1.4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.1.4
15. Handelsman J, et al2004Scientific teachingScience30452110.1126/science.109602215105480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
16. Henry R2010An assessment of STEM faculty involvement in reform of introductory college coursesJ. College Sci. Teaching397481
17. Hestenes D, Wells M, Swackhamer G1992Force concept inventoryPhysics Teacher3014115810.1119/1.2343497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
18. Hurtado S, Newman CB, Tran MC, Chang MJ2010Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: insights from a national projectNew Directions for Institutional Research14851510.1002/ir.357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.357
19. Jarmul D, Olson S1996Beyond Bio 101: the transformation of undergraduate biology educationA Report from the Howard Hughes Medical Institutehttp://www.hhmi.org/BeyondBio101/
20. Libarkin J2008Concept inventories in higher education sciencehttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html
21. National Academy of Science2007Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic futureNational Academies PressWashington, DChttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463219911002136438
22. National Research Council2000How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and schoolNational Academies PressWashington, DChttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9853
23. National Research Council2003Bio2010: transforming undergraduate education for future research biologistsNational Academies PressWashington, DChttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309085357
24. National Research Council2003Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematicsNational Academies PressWashington, DChttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=030907277814699652300698
25. National Task Force on Undergraduate Physics2003Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physicshttp://www.aapt.org/Programs/projects/ntfup.cfm
26. Polik W, Larive C2008New ACS guidelines approved by CPTJ. Chem. Educ.8548410.1021/ed085p484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed085p484
27. Savkar V, Lokere L2010Time to decide: the ambivalence of the world of science toward educationhttp://www.nature.com/scitable/forums/timetodecide
28. Seymour E, Hewitt NM1997Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciencesWestview PressBoulder, CO
29. Smith A, Marbach-Ad G2010Learning outcomes with linked assessments – an essential part of our regular teaching practiceJMBE1112312910.1128/jmbe.v11i2.217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v11i2.217
30. Smith KA, Douglas TC, Cox MF2009Supportive teaching and learning strategies in STEM educationNew Directions for Teaching and Learning117193210.1002/tl.341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.341
31. Volkwein J, Lattuca L, Terenzini P, Strauss L, Sukhbaatar J2004Engineering change: a study of the impact of EC2000Int. J. Engineering Ed.20318328
32. Wieman C, Perkins K, Gilbert S2010Transforming science education at large research universities: a case study in progressChange42710.1080/00091380903563035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091380903563035
33. Wiggins G, McTighe J1998Understanding by designASCDAlexandria, VA
34. Wood W2009Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need themCell Dev. Biol.25112112
jmbe.v13i1.363.citations
jmbe/13/1
content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363
Loading

Citations loading...

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363
2012-05-03
2016-06-25
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/13/1/jmbe-13-1-032.xml.a.html;jsessionid=evplcs4j52nv.x-asm-books-live-01?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error