1887

The Development of Curricular Guidelines for Introductory Microbiology that Focus on Understanding

    Authors: Susan Merkel1,*, the ASM Task Force on Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Microbiology1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: MS Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-5701
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 03 May 2012
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: MS Microbiology, 111 Wing Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-5701. Phone: 607-254-2767. Fax: 607-255-3904. E-mail: [email protected].
    • Copyright © 2012 American Society for Microbiology
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2012 vol. 13 no. 1 32-38. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • XML
  • PDF
    176.77 Kb
  • HTML
    48.14 Kb

    Abstract:

    The number of students who leave majors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) due to a perception that courses are poorly taught is evidence that education reform in STEM is overdue. Despite decades of research that argues for student-centered teaching approaches, most introductory STEM courses are still taught in the large lecture format, focusing on rote memorization. While individual efforts in STEM educational reform are important, solutions will most certainly need to include institutional and cultural change. In biology, numerous national reports have called for educational reform to better prepare future scientists. We describe here a new, concept-based curriculum for Introductory Microbiology courses, designed to promote deep understanding of core concepts. Supported by the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) and based on the overarching concepts and competencies presented in the AAAS/NSF report , we hope it will empower instructors to adapt student-centered approaches so that students in Introductory Microbiology courses can leave the course with a core set of enduring understandings of microbiology.

Key Concept Ranking

Horizontal Gene Transfer
0.45335406
0.45335406

References & Citations

1. AAAS 2010 Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action A report of the American Association for the Advancement of Science http://visionandchange.org/
2. American Society for Microbiology 2010 MicrobeLibrary http://www.microbelibrary.org/
3. American Society for Microbiology 2002 ASM curriculum resources and publications http://forms.asm.org/Education/index.asp?bid=1229
4. Anderson WA, et al 2011 Science education: changing the culture of science education at research universities Science 331 152 153 10.1126/science.1198280 21233371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1198280
5. Association of American Medical Colleges and Howard Hughes Medical Institute 2009 Scientific foundations for future physicians: report of the AAMC-HHMI Committee www.hhmi.org/grants/pdf/08-209_AAMC-HHMI_report.pdf
6. Association of American Universities 2011 Five-year initiative for improving undergraduate STEM education [discussion draft] www.aau.edu/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=12592 22023726 3224195
7. Chang A 2011 A retrospective look at 20 years of ASM education programs (1990–2010) and a prospective look at the next 20 years (2011–2030) JMBE 12 8 12 http://jmbe.asm.org/index.php/jmbe/article/view/253 10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.253
8. Cheesman K, French D, Cheesman I, Swails N, Thomas J 2007 Is there any common curriculum for undergraduate Biology majors in the 21st century? Bioscience 57 516 10.1641/B570609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/B570609
9. Dancy MH, Smith JC, Henderson C 2008 Barriers and promises in STEM reform [commissioned paper for national academies of science workshop on linking evidence and promising practices in STEM undergraduate education] http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Dancy_Henderson_CommissionedPaper.pdf 19058592 1743394
10. Fairweather J 2008 Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: a status report http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html 19113995 2329830
11. Ferrini-Mundy J, Gucler B 2009 Discipline-based efforts to enhance undergraduate STEM education New Directions For Teaching And Learning Spring 2009 55 67 10.1002/tl.344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.344
12. Fox MA, Hackerman N 2003 Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics National Academies Press Washington, DC http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309072778 14699431 174313
13. Froyd J 2008 White paper on promising practices in undergraduate STEM educat ion http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html
14. Gregory E, Ellis J, Orenstein A 2011 A proposal for a common minimal topic set in introductory biology courses for majors Am Biol Teacher. 73 16 21 10.1525/abt.2011.73.1.4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.1.4
15. Handelsman J, et al 2004 Scientific teaching Science 304 521 10.1126/science.1096022 15105480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
16. Henry R 2010 An assessment of STEM faculty involvement in reform of introductory college courses J. College Sci. Teaching 39 74 81
17. Hestenes D, Wells M, Swackhamer G 1992 Force concept inventory Physics Teacher 30 141 158 10.1119/1.2343497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
18. Hurtado S, Newman CB, Tran MC, Chang MJ 2010 Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: insights from a national project New Directions for Institutional Research 148 5 15 10.1002/ir.357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.357
19. Jarmul D, Olson S 1996 Beyond Bio 101: the transformation of undergraduate biology education A Report from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute http://www.hhmi.org/BeyondBio101/
20. Libarkin J 2008 Concept inventories in higher education science http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/PP_Commissioned_Papers.html
21. National Academy of Science 2007 Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future National Academies Press Washington, DC http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463 21991100 2136438
22. National Research Council 2000 How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school National Academies Press Washington, DC http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9853
23. National Research Council 2003 Bio2010: transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists National Academies Press Washington, DC http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309085357
24. National Research Council 2003 Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics National Academies Press Washington, DC http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309072778 14699652 300698
25. National Task Force on Undergraduate Physics 2003 Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics http://www.aapt.org/Programs/projects/ntfup.cfm
26. Polik W, Larive C 2008 New ACS guidelines approved by CPT J. Chem. Educ. 85 484 10.1021/ed085p484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed085p484
27. Savkar V, Lokere L 2010 Time to decide: the ambivalence of the world of science toward education http://www.nature.com/scitable/forums/timetodecide
28. Seymour E, Hewitt NM 1997 Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences Westview Press Boulder, CO
29. Smith A, Marbach-Ad G 2010 Learning outcomes with linked assessments – an essential part of our regular teaching practice JMBE 11 123 129 10.1128/jmbe.v11i2.217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v11i2.217
30. Smith KA, Douglas TC, Cox MF 2009 Supportive teaching and learning strategies in STEM education New Directions for Teaching and Learning 117 19 32 10.1002/tl.341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.341
31. Volkwein J, Lattuca L, Terenzini P, Strauss L, Sukhbaatar J 2004 Engineering change: a study of the impact of EC2000 Int. J. Engineering Ed. 20 318 328
32. Wieman C, Perkins K, Gilbert S 2010 Transforming science education at large research universities: a case study in progress Change 42 7 10.1080/00091380903563035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091380903563035
33. Wiggins G, McTighe J 1998 Understanding by design ASCD Alexandria, VA
34. Wood W 2009 Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them Cell Dev. Biol. 25 112 112

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363
2012-05-03
2019-03-21

Abstract:

The number of students who leave majors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) due to a perception that courses are poorly taught is evidence that education reform in STEM is overdue. Despite decades of research that argues for student-centered teaching approaches, most introductory STEM courses are still taught in the large lecture format, focusing on rote memorization. While individual efforts in STEM educational reform are important, solutions will most certainly need to include institutional and cultural change. In biology, numerous national reports have called for educational reform to better prepare future scientists. We describe here a new, concept-based curriculum for Introductory Microbiology courses, designed to promote deep understanding of core concepts. Supported by the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) and based on the overarching concepts and competencies presented in the AAAS/NSF report , we hope it will empower instructors to adapt student-centered approaches so that students in Introductory Microbiology courses can leave the course with a core set of enduring understandings of microbiology.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/13/1/jmbe-13-1-032.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error