1887

Letter to the Editor

    Authors: Sally G. Hoskins1, Kristy L. Kenyon2
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Biology Department, City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, www.teachcreate.org; 2: Biology Department, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 01 May 2014
    • ©2014 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2014 vol. 15 no. 1 3-4. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.725
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • HTML
    14.69 Kb
  • XML
  • PDF
    136.48 Kb

    Abstract:

    The authors respond to a previously published JMBE article, “The CREATE Method Does Not Result in Greater Gains in Critical Thinking than a More Traditional Method of Analyzing the Primary Literature” by M. Segura-Totten and N. Dalman (JMBE 14: 166–175, 2013).

References & Citations

1. Gottesman AJ, Hoskins SG 2013 CREATE cornerstone: introduction to scientific thinking, a new course for stem-interested freshmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature CBE Life Sci Educ 12 59 72 10.1187/cbe.12-11-0201 23463229 3587857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0201
2. Hoskins SG, Stevens LM, Nehm RH 2007 Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory Genetics 176 3 1381 1389 10.1534/genetics.107.071183 17483426 1931557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.071183
3. Hoskins SG, Stevens LM 2009 Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less is more in teaching science Adv. Physiol. Educ 33 17 20 10.1152/advan.90184.2008 19261755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.90184.2008
4. Hoskins SG, Lopatto D, Stevens LM 2011 The CREATE approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates’ self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemological beliefs CBE Life Sci Educ 10 4 368 378 10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027 22135371 3228655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
5. Stein B, Haynes A, Redding M 2012 The Critical thinking Assessment Test (CAT); Version 5 Center for Assessment & Improvement of Learning, Tennessee Tech Univ Cookeville, TN
jmbe.v15i1.725.citations
jmbe/15/1
content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.725
Loading

Citations loading...

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.725
2014-05-01
2017-11-21

Abstract:

The authors respond to a previously published JMBE article, “The CREATE Method Does Not Result in Greater Gains in Critical Thinking than a More Traditional Method of Analyzing the Primary Literature” by M. Segura-Totten and N. Dalman (JMBE 14: 166–175, 2013).

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/15/1/jmbe-15-3.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.725&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error