1887

Personalized Genetic Testing as a Tool for Integrating Ethics Instruction into Biology Courses

    Authors: Tenny R. Zhang1,*, Misti Ault Anderson1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Washington, DC 20005
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 15 December 2014
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, 1425 New York Ave NW, Washington, DC 20005. Phone: 202-233-3960. Fax: 202-233-3990. E-mail: [email protected].
    • ©2014 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. December 2014 vol. 15 no. 2 197-201. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.773
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • HTML
    56.63 Kb
  • XML
  • PDF
    194.00 Kb

    Abstract:

    Personalized genetic testing (PGT) has been used by some educational institutions as a pedagogical tool for teaching human genetics. While work has been done that examines the potential for PGT to improve students’ interest and understanding of the science involved in genetic testing, there has been less dialogue about how this method might be useful for integrating ethical and societal issues surrounding genetic testing into classroom discussions. Citing the importance of integrating ethics into the biology classroom, we argue that PGT can be an effective educational tool for integrating ethics and science education, and discuss relevant ethical considerations for instructors using this approach.

Key Concept Ranking

DNA
0.5588235
Canning
0.50606966
Genotyping
0.46885866
Lead
0.4297049
Diagnosis
0.3433
0.5588235

References & Citations

1. Austriaco NPG 2014 Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the college classroom: knowledge, attitudes, and concerns of introductory biology students PeerJ PrePrints 2 e242v1 [Online.] https://peerj.com/preprints/242/
2. Austriaco NPG 2012 Personalized genomic educational testing: what do the undergrads think? Am J Bioeth 12 43 45 10.1080/15265161.2012.656818 22452477 3478327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.656818
3. Boguski MS, Boguski RM, Berman MR 2013 Personal genotypes are teachable moments Genome Med 5 22 [Online.] 10.1186/gm426 23514125 3706876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm426
4. Booth JM, Garrett JM 2004 Instructors’ practices in and attitudes toward teaching ethics in the genetics classroom Genetics 168 1111 1117 10.1534/genetics.103.023077 15579673 1448769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.103.023077
5. Callier SL 2012 Swabbing students: should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing? Am J Bioeth 12 32 40 37 10.1080/15265161.2012.656803 22452475 3390747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.656803
6. Daley JA, et al 2013 Personal DNA testing in college classrooms: perspectives of students and professors Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 17 446 452 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0404 23537214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2012.0404
7. Garrett JM, Triman KL 2009 Resources and strategies to integrate the study of ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics into the undergraduate curriculum Adv Genet 66 35 59 43 10.1016/S0065-2660(09)66002-8 19737637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(09)66002-8
8. Gelbart ME 2012 Catching education up with technology: preparing the public to make informed choices about personal genetics CBE Life Sci Educ 11 1 2 10.1187/cbe.11-10-0092 22383610 3292065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-10-0092
9. Krynetskiy E, Calligaro IL 2009 Introducing pharmacy students to pharmacogenomics analysis Am J Pharm Educ 73 71 [Online.] 10.5688/aj730471 http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/aj730471
10. Kung JT, Gelbart ME 2012 Getting a head start: the importance of personal genetics education in high schools Yale J Biol Med 85 87 92 90 22461746 3313542
11. Lee SS, Vernez S 2012 Assessing the pedagogical goals of self-testing in evaluating the consultation needs of different student populations Am J Bioeth 12 41 43 10.1080/15265161.2012.656815 22452476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.656815
12. Loike JD, Rush BS, Schweber A, Fischbach RL 2013 Lessons learned from undergraduate students in designing a science-based course in bioethics CBE Life Sci Educ 12 701 710 708 24297296 3846520
13. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. 2014 Gray matters: integrative approaches for neuroscience, ethics, and society PCSBI Washington, DC
14. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. 2012 Privacy and progress in whole genome sequencing PCSBI Washington, DC
15. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. 2011 Moral science: protecting participants in human subjects research PCSBI Washington DC 73
16. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. (n.d.). Education [Online.] http://bioethics.gov/education. Accessed June 26, 2014
17. Puts D, Shriver M 2011 Genes and human biology, behavior, and evolution [Course syllabus.] [Online.] http://tinyurl.com/p2y7uf2. Accessed June 12, 2014
18. Rasmussen AJ, Ebbesen M 2014 Why should nanoscience students be taught to be ethically competent? Sci Eng Ethics in press 10.1007/s11948-013-9494-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9494-8
19. Rogers JC, Taylor ATS 2011 Teaching about genetic testing issues in the undergraduate classroom: a case study J Genet Couns 20 231 240 10.1007/s10897-011-9352-2 21373958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9352-2
20. Salari K, Karczewski KJ, Hudgins L, Ormond KE 2013 Evidence that personal genome testing enhances student learning in a course on genomics and personalized medicine PLoS One 8 e68853 [Online.] 10.1371/journal.pone.0068853 23935898 3720862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068853
21. Salari K, Pizzo PA, Prober CG 2011 To genotype or not to genotype? Addressing the debate through the development of a genomics and personalized medicine curriculum Acad Med 86 925 927 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182223acf 21795901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182223acf
22. Sanderson SC, et al 2013 Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study Genome Med 5 113 [Online.] 10.1186/gm518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm518
23. Taylor ATS, Rogers JC 2011 The ethical implications of genetic testing in the classroom Biochem Mol Biol Educ 39 253 260 10.1002/bmb.20521 21774053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20521
24. Turrens JF 2005 Teaching research integrity and bioethics to science undergraduates Cell Biol Educ 4 330 334 10.1187/cbe.05-03-0068 16341260 1305895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-03-0068
25. Vernez SL, Salari K, Ormond KE, Lee SS 2013 Personal genome testing in medical education: student experiences with genotyping in the classroom Genome Med 5 24 [Online.] 10.1186/gm428 23510111 3706781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm428
26. Walt DR, et al 2011 Lessons learned from the introduction of personalized genotyping into a medical school curriculum Genet Med 13 63 66 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f872ac http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f872ac
27. Zaikowski LA, Garrett JM 2004 A three-tiered approach to enhance undergraduate education in bioethics Bioscience 54 942 949 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0942:ATATEU]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0942:ATATEU]2.0.CO;2
28. Zettler PJ, Sherkow JS, Greely HT 2014 23andMe, the Food and Drug Administration, and the future of genetic testing JAMA Intern Med 174 493 494 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14706 24535082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14706

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.773
2014-12-15
2019-06-19

Abstract:

Personalized genetic testing (PGT) has been used by some educational institutions as a pedagogical tool for teaching human genetics. While work has been done that examines the potential for PGT to improve students’ interest and understanding of the science involved in genetic testing, there has been less dialogue about how this method might be useful for integrating ethical and societal issues surrounding genetic testing into classroom discussions. Citing the importance of integrating ethics into the biology classroom, we argue that PGT can be an effective educational tool for integrating ethics and science education, and discuss relevant ethical considerations for instructors using this approach.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/15/2/jmbe-15-197.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.773&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error