1887

Cross-Cultural Considerations in U.S. Research Ethics Education

    Author: Elizabeth Heitman1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 15 December 2014
    • Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 400, Nashville, TN 37203. Phone: 615-936-2686. Fax: 615-936-3800. E-mail: elizabeth.heitman@vanderbilt.edu.
    • ©2014 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. December 2014 vol. 15 no. 2 130-134. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.860
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • XML
  • HTML
    58.77 Kb
  • PDF
    201.89 Kb

    Abstract:

    Demand among graduate and postdoctoral trainees for international research experience brings together students and investigators from increasingly diverse cultural backgrounds around the world. Educators in research ethics and scientific integrity need to address the cultural aspects of both science and ethics to help all trainees learn ethical practices for effective collaboration with a diverse array of partners. NIH and NSF’s mandates for instruction in the responsible conduct of research do not specifically address the needs of international trainees or U.S. trainees who undertake research projects abroad. Nonetheless, research ethics educators’ typical focus on policy and professional standards can offer trainees and faculty investigators helpful insights into differing ethical values and priorities in research. Examination of linguistic differences can also reveal important conceptual frameworks that shape ethical practice. New resources for teaching research integrity in cross-cultural settings can be a valuable addition to the development of shared understanding of the goals of scientific research.

Key Concept Ranking

Canning
0.5347343
Translation
0.5013134
Stems
0.41851777
Lead
0.3635204
0.5347343

References & Citations

1. Adams J, Pendlebury D, Stembridge B 2013 Building BRICKS: exploring the global research and innovation impact of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Korea Thomson Reuters [Online.] http://sciencewatch.com/grr/building-bricks
2. Clinical and Translational Science Award Education Core Competency Workgroup 2009 Core competencies for clinical and translational research [Online.] https://www.ctsacentral.org/education_and_career_development/core-competencies-clinical-and-translational-research
3. Council of Graduate Schools 2013 Modeling effective research ethics education in graduate international collaborations [Online.] http://www.cgsnet.org/modeling-effective-research-ethics-education-graduate-international-collaborations
4. Council on International Education 2014 Fulbright Scholar Program [Online.] http://www.cies.org/programs
5. Crump JA, Sugarman JThe Working Group on Ethics Guidelines for Global Health Training (WEIGHT) 2010 Ethics and best practice guidelines for training experiences in global health Am J Trop Med Hyg 83 1178 1182 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0527 21118918 2990028 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0527
6. Drain PK, Primack A, Hunt DD, Fawzi WW, Holmes KK, Gardner P 2007 Global health in medical education: a call for more training and opportunities Acad Med 82 226 230 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180305cf9 17327707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180305cf9
7. Drain PK, Holmes KK, Skeff KM, Hall TL, Gardner P 2009 Global health training and international clinical rotations during residency: current status, needs, and opportunities Acad Med 84 320 325 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970a37 19240438 3998377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970a37
8. DuBois JM, Dueker JM 2009 Teaching and assessing the responsible conduct of research: a Delphi consensus panel report J Res Adm 40 49 70 22500145 3322664
9. DuBois JM, Schilling D, Heitman E, Steneck NH, Kon AA 2010 Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs Clin Trans Sci 3 109 111 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x
10. Falkenheim J, Kannankutty N 2012 International collaborations of scientists and engineers in the United States. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, NSF 12-323 [Online.] http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf12323/
11. Heitman E, Bulger RE 2005 Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content Account Res 12 207 224 10.1080/08989620500217420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989620500217420
12. Heitman E, Petty J 2010 Preparing students to navigate cross-national differences in the research environment: the role of research-integrity education 201 214 Anderson MS, Steneck NH International research collaborations: much to be gained, many ways to get in trouble Routledge New York, NY
13. Heitman E, Litewka S 2011 International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees Urol Onc Sem 29 104 108 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014
14. Heuer R, Einaudi P, Kan KH 2014 Foreign graduate enrollment in science and engineering continues to rise while overall graduate enrollment remains flat. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, NSF 14-313 [Online.] http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf14313/
15. Institute for International Education 2014 Open Doors data. International students: leading places of origin [Online.] http://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Leading-Places-of-Origin/2011-13
16. International Federation of Medical Student Associations 2014 Research exchange [Online.] http://ifmsa.net/public/ecscoreselect.php
17. National Institutes of Health 1994 Reminder and update: requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award institutional training grants NIH Guide 23 23 June 17 1994 P.T. 44 [Online.] http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-200.html
18. National Institutes of Health 2009 Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research, NOT-OD-10-019 [Online.] http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html
19. National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center 2014 Frequently asked questions (FAQs) [Online.] http://www.fic.nih.gov/Grants/Pages/Frequently-Asked-Questions.aspx
20. National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research 2014 Grants policy and guidance [Online.] http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy
21. National Postdoctoral Association Core Competencies Committee 2013 The NPA postdoctoral core competencies toolkit [Online.] http://www.nationalpostdoc.org/competencies
22. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics 2014 Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2012 NSF 14-305. [Online.] http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sed/digest/2012/nsf14305.pdf
23. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics 2014 Science and engineering indicators, 2014 NSB 14-01. [Online.] http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/
24. National Science Foundation, Office of Budget Finance and Award Management 2014 Responsible conduct of research (RCR) [Online.] http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rcr.jsp
25. National Science Foundation, Office of International and Integrative Activities 2014 International research integrity [Online.] http://www.nsf.gov/od/iia/ise/intl-research-integrity.jsp
26. Partnership for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) Science Program Development, security, and cooperation The National Academies Press [Online.] http://sites.nationalacademies.org/pga/dsc/peerscience/index.htm
27. Provenzano AM, Graber LK, Elansary M, Khoshnood K, Rastegar A, Barry M 2010 Short-term global health research projects by U.S. medical students: ethical challenges for partnerships Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83 211 214 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0692 20682858 2911161 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0692
28. Steneck NH, Bulger RE 2007 The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research Acad Med 82 829 834 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d 17726385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d
29. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections Required education in the protection of human research participants Notice OD-00-039. June 5, 2000. (Revised August 25, 2000. [Online.] http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOTOD-00-039.html
30. Vasconcelos S, Leta J, Costa L, Pinto A, Sorenson MM 2009 Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science. Brazilian researchers begin to address an ethical issue EMBO Rep 10 677 682 [Online.] http://embor.embopress.org/content/10/7/677 10.1038/embor.2009.134 19525923 2727439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.134
jmbe.v15i2.860.citations
jmbe/15/2
content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.860
Loading

Citations loading...

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.860
2014-12-15
2017-09-19

Abstract:

Demand among graduate and postdoctoral trainees for international research experience brings together students and investigators from increasingly diverse cultural backgrounds around the world. Educators in research ethics and scientific integrity need to address the cultural aspects of both science and ethics to help all trainees learn ethical practices for effective collaboration with a diverse array of partners. NIH and NSF’s mandates for instruction in the responsible conduct of research do not specifically address the needs of international trainees or U.S. trainees who undertake research projects abroad. Nonetheless, research ethics educators’ typical focus on policy and professional standards can offer trainees and faculty investigators helpful insights into differing ethical values and priorities in research. Examination of linguistic differences can also reveal important conceptual frameworks that shape ethical practice. New resources for teaching research integrity in cross-cultural settings can be a valuable addition to the development of shared understanding of the goals of scientific research.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/15/2/jmbe-15-130.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.860&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error