1887

What’s Not Being Discussed, or Considered, in Science Publishing?

    Author: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Kagawa-ken, Japan, [email protected]
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • ©2015 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. December 2015 vol. 16 no. 2 130-132. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.928
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • XML
  • HTML
    21.86 Kb
  • PDF
    133.43 Kb

    Abstract:

    A letter to the Editor discussing aspects of scientific ethics that were not fully covered by the December 2014 special issue of the Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education (JMBE).

References & Citations

1. COPE (The Committee on Publication Ethics) 2015 Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors [Online.] http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_1.pdf
2. Ferguson C, Marcus A, Oransky I 2014 The peer-review scam Nature 515 7128 480 482 10.1038/515480a 25428481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/515480a
3. Hoke T, Tierney H 2015 Addressing ethics complaints from complainants who submit multiple issues: COPE Discussion Document [Online.] http://publicationethics.org/files/Addressing_ethics_complaints_from_complainants_who_submit_multiple_issues_%20Discussion_Document_Web_Version.pdf
4. ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) 2015 Defining the role of authors and contributors [Online.] http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
5. Teixeira da Silva JA 2013 How to better achieve integrity in science publishing Eur Sci Editors 39 4 97 98
6. Teixeira da Silva JA 2015 A PPPR road-map for the plant sciences: cementing a road-worthy action plan J Educ Soc Res 5 2 15 21
7. Teixeira da Silva JA 2015 The importance of the anonymous voice in post-publication peer review J Assoc Infor Sci Technol In press
8. Teixeira da Silva JA 2015 Negative results: negative perceptions limit their potential for increasing reproducibility J Negat Results Biomed 14 12 10.1186/s12952-015-0033-9 26149259 4494691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12952-015-0033-9
9. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J 2015a Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review Accountability Res 22 1 22 40 10.1080/08989621.2014.899909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909
10. Teixeira da Silva JA Dobránszki J 2015b Do open access data files represent an academic risk? J Assoc Infor Sci Technol 66 11 2390 2391
11. Teixeira da Silva JA 2015 A call for greater editorial responsibilities Sci Editing 2 2 89 91 10.6087/kcse.50 http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.50
12. Yong E, Ledford H, Van Noorden R 2013 Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle Nature 503 7477 454 457 10.1038/503454a 24284713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/503454a

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.928
2015-12-01
2019-03-22

Abstract:

A letter to the Editor discussing aspects of scientific ethics that were not fully covered by the December 2014 special issue of the Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education (JMBE).

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/16/2/jmbe-16-130.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.928&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error