1887

Turning Participatory Microbiome Research into Usable Data: Lessons from the American Gut Project

    Authors: Justine W. Debelius1, Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza2, Daniel McDonald1, Zhenjiang Xu1, Elaine Wolfe1, Rob Knight1,2,*
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92110; 2: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0404
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 01 March 2016
    • ©2016 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.
    • [open-access] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.

    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0763, La Jolla, CA 92093-0763. Phone: 858-822-2379. Fax: 858-246-1981. E-mail: [email protected].
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. March 2016 vol. 17 no. 1 46-50. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1034
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • PDF
    169.18 Kb
  • XML
  • HTML
    41.41 Kb

    Abstract:

    The role of the human microbiome is the subject of continued investigation resulting in increased understanding. However, current microbiome research has only scratched the surface of the variety of healthy microbiomes. Public participation in science through crowdsourcing and crowdfunding microbiome research provides a novel opportunity for both participants and investigators. However, turning participatory science into publishable data can be challenging. Clear communication with the participant base and among researchers can ameliorate some challenges. Three major aspects need to be considered: recruitment and ongoing interaction, sample collection, and data analysis. Usable data can be maximized through diligent participant interaction, careful survey design, and maintaining an open source pipeline. While participatory science will complement rather than replace traditional avenues, it presents new opportunities for studies in the microbiome and beyond.

References & Citations

1. Alang N, Kelly CR 2015 Weight gain after fecal microbiota transplantation Open Forum Infect Dis 2 ofv004 10.1093/ofid/ofv004 26034755 4438885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofv004
2. Archer E, Pavela G, Lavie CJ 2015 The inadmissibility of what we eat in America and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines Mayo Clin Proc 90 911 926 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009 26071068 4527547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009
3. Brestof JR, Artis D 2013 Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system Nat Rev Immunol 14 676 684 10.1038/ni.2640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.2640
4. David LA, et al 2014 Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome Nature 505 559 563 10.1038/nature12820 3957428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12820
5. Dethlefsen L, Relman DA 2011 Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 Suppl 4554 4561 10.1073/pnas.1000087107 3063582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000087107
6. Gerber EM, Hui JS, Kuo P-Y 2012 Crowdfunding: why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms Proc Int Work 10
7. Gerber EM, Hui J 2013 Crowdfunding: motivations and deterrents for participation ACM Trans Comput Interact 20 32 10.1145/2530540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2530540
8. Gevers D, et al 2014 The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease Cell Host Microbe 15 382 392 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005 24629344 4059512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005
9. Goodrich JK, et al 2014 Human genetics shape the gut microbiome Cell 159 789 799 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053 25417156 4255478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053
10. Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ 2012 Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system Science 336 1268 1273 10.1126/science.1223490 22674334 4420145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1223490
11. Human Microbiome Project Consortium (The) 2012 Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome Nature 486 207 214 10.1038/nature11234 22699609 3564958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11234
12. Knight R, et al 2012 Unlocking the potential of metagenomics through replicated experimental design Nat Biotechnol 30 513 520 10.1038/nbt.2235 22678395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2235
13. Knights D, Costello EK, Knight R 2011 Supervised classification of human microbiota FEMS Microbiol Rev 35 343 359 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00251.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00251.x
14. Lozupone CA, et al 2013 Meta-analyses of studies of the human microbiota Genome Res 23 1704 1714 10.1101/gr.151803.112 23861384 3787266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.151803.112
15. Maurice CF, Haiser HJ, Turnbaugh PJ 2013 Xenobiotics shape the physiology and gene expression of the active human gut microbiome Cell 152 39 50 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.052 23332745 3552296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.052
16. Neuman H, Debelius JW, Knight R, Koren O 2015 Microbial endocrinology: the interplay between the microbiota and the endocrine system FEMS Microbiol Rev 39 509 521 10.1093/femsre/fuu010 25701044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuu010
17. Ridaura VK, et al 2013 Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice Science 341 1241214 10.1126/science.1241214 24009397 3829625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1241214
18. Subramanian S, et al 2014 Persistent gut microbiota immaturity in malnourished Bangladeshi children Nature 510 417 421 24896187 4189846
19. Walters WA, Xu Z, Knight R 2014 Metaanalyses of human gut microbes associated with obesity and IBD FEBS Lett 588 4223 4233 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.039 25307765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.039
20. Yatsunenko T, et al 2012 Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography Nature 486 222 227 22699611 3376388

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1034
2016-03-01
2019-01-18

Abstract:

The role of the human microbiome is the subject of continued investigation resulting in increased understanding. However, current microbiome research has only scratched the surface of the variety of healthy microbiomes. Public participation in science through crowdsourcing and crowdfunding microbiome research provides a novel opportunity for both participants and investigators. However, turning participatory science into publishable data can be challenging. Clear communication with the participant base and among researchers can ameliorate some challenges. Three major aspects need to be considered: recruitment and ongoing interaction, sample collection, and data analysis. Usable data can be maximized through diligent participant interaction, careful survey design, and maintaining an open source pipeline. While participatory science will complement rather than replace traditional avenues, it presents new opportunities for studies in the microbiome and beyond.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/17/1/jmbe-17-46.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1034&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error