1887

Using a Concept Inventory to Reveal Student Thinking Associated with Common Misconceptions about Antibiotic Resistance

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • HTML
    43.98 Kb
  • PDF
    254.38 Kb
  • XML
    59.61 Kb

    Abstract:

    Misconceptions, also known as alternate conceptions, about key concepts often hinder the ability of students to learn new knowledge. Concept inventories (CIs) are designed to assess students’ understanding of key concepts, especially those prone to misconceptions. Two-tiered CIs include prompts that ask students to explain the logic behind their answer choice. Such two-tiered CIs afford an opportunity for faculty to explore the student thinking behind the common misconceptions represented by their choice of a distractor. In this study, we specifically sought to probe the misconceptions that students hold prior to beginning an introductory microbiology course (i.e., preconceptions). Faculty-learning communities at two research-intensive universities used the validated Host-Pathogen Interaction Concept Inventory (HPI-CI) to reveal student preconceptions. Our method of deep analysis involved communal review and discussion of students’ explanations for their CI answer choice. This approach provided insight valuable for curriculum development. Here the process is illustrated using one question from the HPI-CI related to the important topic of antibiotic resistance. The frequencies with which students chose particular multiple-choice responses for this question were highly correlated between institutions, implying common underlying misconceptions. Examination of student explanations using our analysis approach, coupled with group discussions within and between institutions, revealed patterns in student thinking to the participating faculty. Similar application of a two-tiered concept inventory by general microbiology instructors, either individually or in groups, at other institutions will allow them to better understand student thinking related to key concepts in their curriculum.

Key Concept Ranking

Bacterial Proteins
0.6793364
Cell Wall
0.50895065
Gram-Negative Bacteria
0.4707824
Gram-Positive Bacteria
0.42891636
Host-Pathogen Interactions
0.41912806
0.6793364

References & Citations

1. Merkel SASM Task Force on Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Microbiology2012The development of curricular guidelines for introductory microbiology that focus on understandingJ Microbiol Biol Educ13323810.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363236537793577306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363
2. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary27March2015Fact sheet: Obama administration releases national action plan to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteriahttps://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/27/fact-sheet-obamaadministration-releases-national-action-plan-combat-ant
3. Brookes-Howell L, Elwyn G, Hood K, Wood F, Cooper L, Goossens H, Leven M, Butler CC2012‘The body gets used to them’: patients’ interpretations of antibiotic resistance and the implications for containment strategiesJ Gen Intern Med2776677210.1007/s11606-011-1916-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1916-1
4. Fisher KM2004The importance of prior knowledge in college science instruction6983 Sunal DW, Wright EL, Bland JReform in undergraduate science teaching for the 21st centuryInformation Age PublishingCharlotte, NC
5. Hailikari T, Katajavuori N, Lindblom-Ylanne S2008The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional designAm J Pharm Educ7211310.5688/aj7205113 http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113
6. Marbach-Ad G, McAdams K, Benson S, Briken V, Cathcart L, Chase M, El-Sayed N, Frauwirth K, Fredericksen B, Joseph S, Lee V, McIver K, Mosser D, Quimby B, Shields P, Song W, Stein D, Stewart R, Thompson K, Smith A2010A model for using a concept inventory as a tool for students’ assessment and faculty professional developmentCBE Life Sci Educ940843610.1187/cbe.10-05-0069211236862995757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-05-0069
7. Ausubel DP1968Educational psychology: a cognitive viewHolt, Rinehart and WinstonNew York, NY, and Toronto, ON
8. Bruner JS1960The process of educationHarvard University PressCambridge, MA
9. Vygotsky LS1978Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processesHarvard University PressCambridge, MA
10. Fisher KM1985A misconception in biology: amino acids and translationJ Res Sci Teach22536210.1002/tea.3660220105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220105
11. Thijs GD, van den Berg E1993Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions Novak JDProceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and MathematicsCornell UniversityIthaca, NY
12. Osborne RJ, Cosgrove MM1983Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of waterJ Res Sci Teach2082583810.1002/tea.3660200905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200905
13. Bloom BS1976Human characteristics and school learningMcGraw-HillNew York, NY
14. Dochy F, Segers M, Buehl MM1999The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: the case of research on prior knowledgeRev Educ Res6914518610.3102/00346543069002145 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543069002145
15. Tobias S1994Interest, prior knowledge and learningRev Educ Res64375410.3102/00346543064001037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037
16. Hestenes D, Wells M, Swackhammer G1992Force concept inventoryPhys Teach3014115810.1119/1.2343497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
17. Marbach-Ad G, Briken V, El-Sayed N, Frauwirth K, Fredericksen B, Hutcheson S, Gao L, Joseph S, Lee V, McIver KS, Mosser D, Quimby BB, Shields P, Song W, Stein DC, Yuan RT, Smith AC2009Assessing student understanding of host pathogen interactions using a concept inventoryJ Microbiol Biol Educ10435010.1128/jmbe.v10.98236536893577151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v10.98
18. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)2011Vision and change: a call to actionAAASWashington, DC
19. Anderson DL, Fisher KM, Norman GJ2002Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selectionJ Res Sci Teach3995297810.1002/tea.10053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10053
20. Khodor J, Gould Halme D, Walker GC2004A hierarchical biology concept framework: a tool for course designCell Biol Educ311112110.1187/cbe.03-10-001415257339437643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-10-0014
21. Mulford DR, Robinson WR2002An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry studentsJ Chem Educ7973977410.1021/ed079p739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed079p739
22. Odom AL, Barrow LH1995Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instructionJ Res Sci Teach32456110.1002/tea.3660320106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320106
23. Treagust DF1988Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in scienceInt J Sci Educ1015916910.1080/0950069880100204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
24. Smith AC, Marbach-Ad G, Stevens AM, Balcom SA, Buchner J, Daniel SL, DeStephano JJ, El-Sayed NM, Frauwirth K, Lee VT, McIver KS, Melville SB, Mosser DM, Pophan DL, Scarf BE, Schubert FD, Seyler RWJr, Shields PA, Song W, Stein DC, Stewart RC, Thompson KV, Yang Z, Yarwood SA2016Successful model for professional development: creating and sustaining faculty learning communities280293 Weaver GC, Burgess WD, Childress AL, Slakey LTransforming institutions: undergraduate STEM education for the 21st CenturyPurdue University PressWest Lafayette, IN
25. Michael J, McFarland J, Wright A2008The second Conceptual Assessment in the Biological Sciences workshopAdv Physiol Educ3224825110.1152/advan.90122.200818794250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.90122.2008
26. Reeves T, Marbach-Ad G2016Contemporary test validity in theory and practice: a primer for discipline-based education researchersCBE Life Sci Educ151rm110.1187/cbe.15-08-0183269034984803101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183
27. Stewart RC, Stein DC, McIver KS, Buchner J, Smith AC2014Cow of the future: Genetically engineering a microbe to reduce bovine methane emissionsNational Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New Yorkhttps://saber-biologyeducationresearch.wikispaces.com/DBER-Concept+Inventories
28. Smith AC, Buchner J2012“Cow of the Future Project” Using a case study to challenge student misconceptions about antibiotic resistance Abstr 19th Annual American Society for Microbiology Conference for Undergraduate EducatorsJ Microbiol Biol Educ13105123
29. Reif F2008Applying cognitive science to education: thinking and learning in scientific and other complex domainsMIT pressCambridge, MA
30. Taber KS2001Building the structural concepts of chemistry: some considerations from educational researchChem Educ Res Pract2212315810.1039/B1RP90014E http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90014E
31. Schönborn K, Anderson T2008Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap-conceptual understanding, Part 2: Assessing and developing student knowledgeBiochem Molec Biol Educ36537237910.1002/bmb.20230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20230
32. Marbach-Ad G, Briken V, Frauwirth K, Gao LY, Hutcheson S, Joseph S, Mosser D, Parent B, Shields P, Song W, Stein D, Swanson K, Thompson KV, Yuan R, Smith AC2007A faculty team works to create content linkages among various courses to increase meaningful learning of targeted concepts of microbiologyCBE Life Sci Educ615516210.1187/cbe.06-12-0212175488771885905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0212
33. Wenger E1998Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identityCambridge University PressCambridge, MA10.1017/CBO9780511803932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
jmbe.v18i1.1281.citations
jmbe/18/1
content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1281
Loading

Citations loading...

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1281
2017-04-21
2017-09-21

Abstract:

Misconceptions, also known as alternate conceptions, about key concepts often hinder the ability of students to learn new knowledge. Concept inventories (CIs) are designed to assess students’ understanding of key concepts, especially those prone to misconceptions. Two-tiered CIs include prompts that ask students to explain the logic behind their answer choice. Such two-tiered CIs afford an opportunity for faculty to explore the student thinking behind the common misconceptions represented by their choice of a distractor. In this study, we specifically sought to probe the misconceptions that students hold prior to beginning an introductory microbiology course (i.e., preconceptions). Faculty-learning communities at two research-intensive universities used the validated Host-Pathogen Interaction Concept Inventory (HPI-CI) to reveal student preconceptions. Our method of deep analysis involved communal review and discussion of students’ explanations for their CI answer choice. This approach provided insight valuable for curriculum development. Here the process is illustrated using one question from the HPI-CI related to the important topic of antibiotic resistance. The frequencies with which students chose particular multiple-choice responses for this question were highly correlated between institutions, implying common underlying misconceptions. Examination of student explanations using our analysis approach, coupled with group discussions within and between institutions, revealed patterns in student thinking to the participating faculty. Similar application of a two-tiered concept inventory by general microbiology instructors, either individually or in groups, at other institutions will allow them to better understand student thinking related to key concepts in their curriculum.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/18/1/jmbe-18-8.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1281&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error