1887

Context Determines Strategies for ‘Activating’ the Inclusive Classroom

    Author: Bryan M. Dewsbury1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Received 01 May 2017 Accepted 21 September 2017 Published 15 December 2017
    • ©2017 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology
    • [open-access] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.

    • Corresponding author. Mailing address: 120 Flagg Road, CBS 483, Kingston, RI. Phone: 401-874-2248. Fax: 401-874-9107. E-mail: [email protected].
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. December 2017 vol. 18 no. 3 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1347
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • PDF
    172.60 Kb
  • XML
    46.35 Kb
  • HTML
    40.78 Kb

    Abstract:

    A number of reports have called for the transformation of college science pedagogy. For instructors interested in transforming their own classrooms, the number of approaches, tools, and literature on pedagogical transformation can be overwhelming. The literature is rich with examples of the positive significant effects of active learning, but is lacking on frameworks that can help guide implementation. In this manuscript, I use Fink’s conceptual framework for “creating significant learning experiences” and a conceptual framework for inclusive teaching and learning to focus on how situation-specific drivers inform the choice of active learning strategies. I argue essentially that while, on average, active learning may promote greater academic outcomes, the context of the implementation matters. Using personal examples and evidence from the literature, I provide a Perspective here on why context considerations should be the main drivers of effective pedagogies.

Key Concept Ranking

Stems
0.8315815
Transformation
0.75
Elements
0.5169297
Roots
0.43161666
0.8315815

References & Citations

1. Prince M 2004 Does active learning work? A review of the research J Engineer Educ 93 3 223 231 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
2. Cooper MM 2016 It is time to say what we mean J Chem Educ 93 5 799 800 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00227
3. Wieman CE 2014 Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message Proc Natl Acad Sci 111 23 8319 8320 10.1073/pnas.1407304111 24853505 4060683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407304111
4. Goodwin L, Miller JE, Cheetham RD 1991 Teaching freshmen to think: does active learning work? BioScience 41 10 719 722 10.2307/1311767 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1311767
5. Michael J 2006 Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ 30 4 159 167 10.1152/advan.00053.2006 17108243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
6. Bonwell CC, Sutherland TE 1996 The active learning continuum: choosing activities to engage students in the classroom New Dir Teach Learn 1996 67 3 16 10.1002/tl.37219966704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966704
7. Eddy SL, Hogan KA 2014 Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE Life Sci Educ 13 3 453 468 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050 25185229 4152207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050
8. Marchesani LS, Adams M 1992 Dynamics of diversity in the teaching-learning process: a faculty development model for analysis and action New Dir Teach Learn 1992 52 9 20 10.1002/tl.37219925203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219925203
9. Fink LD 2013 Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ
10. Becker K, Park K 2011 Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: a preliminary meta-analysis J STEM Educ Innov Res 12 5/6 23
11. Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 2008 The critical importance of retrieval for learning Science 319 5865 966 968 10.1126/science.1152408 18276894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408
12. Lucas R, Lammont N 1998 Combining work and study: an empirical study of full-time students in school, college and university J Educ Work 11 1 41 56 10.1080/1363908980110103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1363908980110103
13. Epstein ML, Lazarus AD, Calvano TB, Matthews KA, Hendel RA, Epstein BB, Brosvic GM 2002 Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses Psychol Record 52 2 187 201 10.1007/BF03395423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03395423
14. Faust JL, Paulson DR 1998 Active learning in the college classroom J Excel Coll Teach 9 2 3 24
15. Berrett D 2012 How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture Educ Dig 78 1 36
16. Herreid CF, Schiller NA 2013 Case studies and the flipped classroom J Coll Sci Teach 42 5 62 66
17. Chamany K, Allen D, Tanner K 2008 Making biology learning relevant to students: integrating people, history, and context into college biology teaching CBE Life Sci Educ 7 3 267 278 10.1187/cbe.08-06-0029 18765745 2527976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-06-0029
18. Hurtado S, Newman CB, Tran MC, Chang MJ 2010 Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: insights from a national project New Direct Instit Res 2010 148 5 15 10.1002/ir.357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.357
19. Brandt AM 1978 Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study Hastings Center Rep 8 6 21 29 10.2307/3561468 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3561468
20. Caplan AL, Parent B, Shen M, Plunkett C 2015 No time to waste—the ethical challenges created by CRISPR EMBO Rep 16 11 1421 1426 10.15252/embr.201541337 26450575 4641494 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541337
21. Masters JR 2002 HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly Nat Rev Cancer 2 4 315 319 10.1038/nrc775 12001993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc775
22. Freire P 1973 Education for critical consciousness 1 Bloomsbury Publishing London, UK
23. Moog RS, Spencer JN 2008 Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) American Chemical Society Washington, DC 10.1021/bk-2008-0994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0994
24. Zumbrunn S, McKim C, Buhs E, Hawley LR 2014 Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: a mixed method study Instruct Sci 42 5 661 684 10.1007/s11251-014-9310-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9310-0
25. Shor I, Freire P 1987 What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? J Educ 11 31 10.1177/002205748716900303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002205748716900303
26. Paris SG, Winograd P 1990 How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction Dimens Think Cogn Instr 1 15 51
27. Gardner JN 1986 The freshman year experience Coll Univ 61 4 261 274
28. McGuire SY 2015 Teach students how to learn: strategies you can incorporate into any course to improve student metacognition, study skills, and motivation Stylus Publishing, LLC Sterling, VA
29. Chew SL 2007 Study more! Study harder! Students’ and teachers’ faulty beliefs about how people learn. Essays from E-xcellence in Teaching. A monthly series of invited essays published on the PsychTeacher electronic discussion board by the Society for Teaching Psychology, June 2007. Reprinted. 2007 Gen Psychol 42 8 10

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1347
2017-12-15
2019-01-16

Abstract:

A number of reports have called for the transformation of college science pedagogy. For instructors interested in transforming their own classrooms, the number of approaches, tools, and literature on pedagogical transformation can be overwhelming. The literature is rich with examples of the positive significant effects of active learning, but is lacking on frameworks that can help guide implementation. In this manuscript, I use Fink’s conceptual framework for “creating significant learning experiences” and a conceptual framework for inclusive teaching and learning to focus on how situation-specific drivers inform the choice of active learning strategies. I argue essentially that while, on average, active learning may promote greater academic outcomes, the context of the implementation matters. Using personal examples and evidence from the literature, I provide a Perspective here on why context considerations should be the main drivers of effective pedagogies.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/18/3/jmbe-18-66.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1347&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error