1887

Chapter 11 : Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of

Authors: Marcel A. P. van Bergen1, Jos P. M. van Putten2, Kate E. Dingle3, Martin J. Blaser4, Jaap A. Wagenaar5
VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
Affiliations: 1: Division of Infectious Diseases, Animal Sciences Group, OIE Reference Laboratory for Campylobacteriosis and WHO Collaboration Centre for Campylobacter, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands; 2: Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, OIE Reference Laboratory for Campylobacteriosis and WHO Collaboration Centre for Campylobacter, P.O. Box 80.165, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands; 3: Department of Microbiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Nuffield Department of Clinical Sciences, Oxford University, OX3 9DU Oxford, United Kingdom; 4: Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York NY 10016; 5: Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, OIE Reference Laboratory for Campylobacteriosis and WHO Collaboration Centre for Campylobacter, P.O. Box 80.165, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
Content Type: Monograph
Publication Year: 2008

Category: Bacterial Pathogenesis

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Zoom in
Zoomout

Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555815554/9781555814373_Chap11-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555815554/9781555814373_Chap11-2.gif

Abstract:

This chapter presents an overview of the historic classifications and nomenclature of . The current recognized nomenclature for was officially accepted in 1980, published in the approved list of bacterial names, and in accordance with that used in . During 1950s to 1970s, identification, subspecies differentiation, and typing results were based on phenotypic methods that are limited in both reliability and interpretation. Screening programs aiming to control bovine genital campylobacteriosis and limit the economic impact are performed by veterinary health services. The majority of the molecular methods are sensitive and can be used to identify . However, one study has investigated the use of animal models for subspecies differentiation, on the premise that subsp. and subsp. have differences in their preference for host and niche. The use of animals for subspecies differentiation purposes is not practical and has never been publicly evaluated. Phenotyping of has been confined to serotyping. The currently accepted serotyping scheme is based on the heat-stable O antigens and consists of only two serotypes, A and B. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) results showed that has a more clonal structure compared with most other species within the genus. MLST in combination with a subsp. –specific PCR may be applied. Currently, the best method for typing purposes is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11

Key Concept Ranking

Campylobacter fetus
0.52603203
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
0.5058634
Multilocus Sequence Typing
0.48177472
0.52603203
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Figures

Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of Campylobacter fetus
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-1,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Marcel A. P., foaf_name=Marcel A. P. van Bergen, foaf_surname=van Bergen, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-2,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-2,properties={foaf_givenname=Jos P. M., foaf_name=Jos P. M. van Putten, foaf_surname=van Putten, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff2]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-3,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-3,properties={foaf_givenname=Kate E., foaf_name=Kate E. Dingle, foaf_surname=Dingle, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff3]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-4,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-4,properties={foaf_givenname=Martin J., foaf_name=Martin J. Blaser, foaf_surname=Blaser, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff4]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-5,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-5,properties={foaf_givenname=Jaap A., foaf_name=Jaap A. Wagenaar, foaf_surname=Wagenaar, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff5]]}]]
Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
/content/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11.ch11fig01
Figure 1.
Lack of genetic diversity in the A locus compared with other species. Radial neighbor-joining tree comparing 477 nt sequences at the A locus of with those of five other species. Alleles are numbered as in the MLST databases at http://pubmlst.org/ and prefixed by a letter to indicate the species. Bootstrap values are shown. Reprinted from the ( ).
10.1128/9781555815554/f0217-01_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555815554/f0217-01.gif
Image of Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Lack of genetic diversity in the A locus compared with other species. Radial neighbor-joining tree comparing 477 nt sequences at the A locus of with those of five other species. Alleles are numbered as in the MLST databases at http://pubmlst.org/ and prefixed by a letter to indicate the species. Bootstrap values are shown. Reprinted from the ( ).

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
/content/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11.ch11fig02
Figure 2.
Dendrogram showing the AFLP banding patterns of 69 strains. Cluster analysis was based on the similarity levels among bands in region 841 to 879 of the banding patterns (arrow). The different clusters of subsp. and subsp. are indicated. The percentage of genetic similarity among banding patterns is shown. Reprinted from the ( ).
10.1128/9781555815554/f0219-01_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555815554/f0219-01.gif
Image of Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Dendrogram showing the AFLP banding patterns of 69 strains. Cluster analysis was based on the similarity levels among bands in region 841 to 879 of the banding patterns (arrow). The different clusters of subsp. and subsp. are indicated. The percentage of genetic similarity among banding patterns is shown. Reprinted from the ( ).

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
/content/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11.ch11fig03
Figure 3.
Congruence of sequence type (ST), type, and subspecies. Analysis of concatenated MLST sequences by split decomposition. The three STs identified in association with subsp. are indicated by the dotted line, the remainder being subsp. . The correlation among ST and type is marked; solid line, A; dashed line, B. A radial neighbor-joining tree constructed by using the same data (inset) is shown to indicate the corresponding treelike phylogenies obtained by both methods. This supports the idea that subsp. and subsp. evolved recently, with little (if any) evidence of recombination, and that genetic changes have accumulated by the vertical transmission of point mutations, yielding a clonal structure to the population. Reprinted from the ( ).
10.1128/9781555815554/f0220-01_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555815554/f0220-01.gif
Image of Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Congruence of sequence type (ST), type, and subspecies. Analysis of concatenated MLST sequences by split decomposition. The three STs identified in association with subsp. are indicated by the dotted line, the remainder being subsp. . The correlation among ST and type is marked; solid line, A; dashed line, B. A radial neighbor-joining tree constructed by using the same data (inset) is shown to indicate the corresponding treelike phylogenies obtained by both methods. This supports the idea that subsp. and subsp. evolved recently, with little (if any) evidence of recombination, and that genetic changes have accumulated by the vertical transmission of point mutations, yielding a clonal structure to the population. Reprinted from the ( ).

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
/content/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11.ch11fig04
Figure 4.
Schematic of proposed ancestral relationships and pathogenicities for based on previous and recent studies. strains colonize a variety of animals and/or are pathogens of these species. Infection of humans usually reflects direct contact with such animals or exposure to –contaminated foods. The widths of the arrows indicate the relative frequencies of human infection with these strains. Reprinted from the ( ).
10.1128/9781555815554/f0221-01_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555815554/f0221-01.gif
Image of Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Schematic of proposed ancestral relationships and pathogenicities for based on previous and recent studies. strains colonize a variety of animals and/or are pathogens of these species. Infection of humans usually reflects direct contact with such animals or exposure to –contaminated foods. The widths of the arrows indicate the relative frequencies of human infection with these strains. Reprinted from the ( ).

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
1. Ardrey, W. B.,, P. Armstrong,, W. A. Meinershagen, and, F. W. Frank. 1972. Diagnosis of ovine vibriosis and enzootic abortion of ewes by immunofluorescence technique. Am. J. Vet. Res. 33: 2535– 2538.
2. Atabay, H. I., and, J. E. L. Corry. 1998. The isolation and prevalence of campylobacters from dairy cattle using a variety of methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84: 733– 740.
3. Barrett, T. J.,, C. Patton, and, G. K. Morris. 1988. Differentiation of Campylobacter species using phenotypic characterization. Microbiology 19: 96– 102.
4. Berg, R. L.,, J. W. Jutila, and, B. D. Firehammer. 1971. A revised classification of Vibrio fetus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 32: 11– 22.
5. Blaser, M. J.,, C. W. Moss, and, R. E. Weaver. 1980. Cellular fatty acid composition of Campylobacter fetus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 11: 448– 451.
6. Blom, K.,, C. M. Patton,, M. A. Nicholson, and, B. Swaminathan. 1995. Identification of Campylobacter fetus by PCR DNA probe method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33: 1360– 1362.
7. Bokkenheuser, V. 1972. Vibrio fetus infection in man: a serological test. Infect. Immun. 5: 222– 226.
8. Brooks, B. W.,, J. Devenish,, C. L. Lutze-Wallace,, D. Milnes,, R. H. Robertson, and, G. Berlie-Surujballi. 2004. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Campylobacter fetus in bovine preputial washing and vaginal mucus samples. Vet. Microbiol. 103: 77– 84.
9. Bryner, J. H.,, P. C. Estes,, J. W. Foley, and, P. A. O’Berry. 1971. Infectivity of three Vibrio fetus biotypes for gallbladder and intestines of cattle, sheep, rabbits, guinea pigs, and mice. Am. J. Vet. Res. 32: 465– 470.
10. Bryner, J. H.,, J. W. Foley,, W. T. Hubbert, and, P. J. Matthews. 1978. Pregnant guinea pig model for testing efficacy of Campylobacter fetus vaccines. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39: 119– 121.
11. Bryner, J. H.,, A. H. Frank, and, P. A. O’Berry. 1962. Dissociation studies of Vibrios from the bovine genital tract. Am. J. Vet. Res. 23: 32– 41.
12. Bryner, J. H.,, P. A. O’Berry, and, A. H. Frank. 1964. Vibrio infection of the digestive organs of cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 25: 1048– 1050.
13. Bryner, J. H.,, A. E. Ritchie,, G. D. Booth, and, J. W. Foley. 1973. Lytic activity of vibrio phages on strains of Vibrio fetus isolated from man and animals. Appl. Microbiol. 26: 404– 409.
14. Campero, C. M.,, M. L. Anderson,, R. L. Walker,, P. C. Blanchard,, L. Barbano,, P. Chiu,, A. Martinez,, G. Combessies,, J. C. Bardon, and, J. Cordeviola. 2005. Immunohistochemical identification of Campylobacter fetus in natural cases of bovine and ovine abortions. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 52: 138– 141.
15. Casadémont, I.,, C. Bizet,, D. Chevrier, and, J.-L. Guesdon. 2000. Rapid detection of Campylobacter fetus by polymerase chain reaction combined with non-radioactive hybridization using a oligonucleotide covalently bound to microwells. Mol. Cell. Probes 14: 233– 240.
16. Casadémont, I.,, D. Chevrier, and, J. Guesdon. 1998. Cloning of a sapB homologue ( sapB2) encoding a putative 112-kDa Campylobacter fetus S-layer protein and its use for identification and molecular genotyping. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 21: 269– 281.
17. Chang, W., and, J. E. Ogg. 1971. Transduction and mutation to glycine tolerance in Vibrio fetus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 32: 649– 653.
18. Chang, W., and, J. E. Ogg. 1970. Transduction in Vibrio fetus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 31: 919– 924.
19. Charlier, G.,, P. Dekeyser,, A. Florent,, R. Strobbe, and, J. De Ley. 1974. DNA base composition and biochemical characters of Campylobacter strains. Antonie Van Leeuwwenhoek 40: 145– 151.
20. Collins, D. M., and, D. E. Ross. 1984. Restriction endonuclease analysis of Campylobacter strains with particular reference to Campylobacter fetus ss. fetus. J. Med. Microbiol. 18: 117– 124.
21. Dekeyser, J. 1984. Bovine genital campylobacteriosis, p. 181– 191. In J. P. Butzler (ed.), Campylobacter Infection in Man and Animals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22. Denes, A. S.,, C. L. Lutze-Wallace,, M. L. Cormier, and, M. M. Garcia. 1997. DNA fingerprinting of Campylobacter fetus using cloned constructs of ribosomal RNA and surface array protein genes. Vet. Microbiol. 54: 185– 193.
23. Dennis, S. M. 1967. The possible role of the raven in the transmission of ovine vibriosis. Aust. Vet. J. 43: 45– 48.
24. Duim, B.,, P. A. Vandamme,, A. Rigter,, S. Laevens,, J. R. Dijkstra, and, J. A. Wagenaar. 2001. Differentiation of Campylobacter species by AFLP fingerprinting. Microbiology 147: 2729– 2737.
25. Dworkin, J.,, M. K. Tummuru, and, M. J. Blaser. 1995. Segmental conservation of sapA sequences in type B Campylobacter fetus cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 15093– 15101.
26. Eaglesome, M. D., and, M. M. Garcia. 1992. Microbial agents associated with bovine genital tract infections and semen. I. Brucella abortus, Leptospira, Campylobacter fetus, and Tritrichomonas foetus. Vet. Bull. 62: 743– 775.
27. Eaglesome, M. D.,, M. I. Sampath, and, M. M. Garcia. 1995. A detection assay for Campylobacter fetus in bovine semen by restriction analysis of PCR amplified DNA. Vet. Res. Commun. 19: 253– 263.
28. Elazhary, M. 1968. An assay of isolation and identification of some animal vibrios and of elucidation of their pathological significance. Med. Veeartschool Rijksuniv Gent 12: 1– 80.
29. Ferguson, D. A., and, D. W. Lambe. 1984. Differentiation of Campylobacter species by protein banding patterns in polyacrylamide slab gels. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20: 453– 460.
30. Firehammer, B. D., and, R. L. Berg. 1965. The use of temperature tolerance in the identification of Vibrio fetus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 26: 995– 997.
31. Florent, A. 1959. Les deux vibriosis génitales: la vibriose due à V. fetus venerealis et la vibriose d’origine intestinale due à V. fetus intestinalis. Med. Veeartschool Rijksuniv. Gent 3: 1– 60.
32. Fujimoto, S.,, A. Takade,, K. Amako, and, M. J. Blaser. 1991. Correlation between molecular size of the surface array protein and morphology and antigenicity of the Campylobacter fetus S layer. Infect. Immun. 59: 2017– 2022.
33. Fujita, M., and, K. Amako. 1994. Localization of the sapA gene on a physical map of Campylobacter fetus chromosomal DNA. Arch. Microbiol. 162: 375– 80.
34. Fujita, M.,, S. Fujimoto,, T. Morooka, and, K. Amako. 1995a. Analysis of strains of Campylobacter fetus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33: 1676– 1678.
35. Fujita, M.,, T. Morooka,, S. Fujimoto,, T. Moriya, and, K. Amako. 1995b. Southern blotting analyses of strains of Campylobacter fetus using the conserved region of sapA. Arch. Microbiol. 164: 444– 447.
36. Garcia, M. M.,, M. D. Eaglesome, and, C. Rigby. 1983. Campylobacters important in veterinary medicine. Vet. Bull. 53: 793– 818.
37. Garcia, M. M.,, R. B. Stewart, and, G. M Ruckerbauer. 1984. Quantitative evaluation of a transport-enrichment medium for Campylobacter fetus. Vet. Rec. 115: 434– 436.
38. George, H. A.,, P. S. Hoffman,, R. M. Smibert, and, N. R. Krieg. 1978. Improved media for growth and aerotolerance of Campylobacter fetus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 8: 36– 41.
39. Grogono-Thomas, M. J. B.,, M. Ahmadi, and, D. G. Newell. 2003. Role of S-layer protein antigenic diversity in the immune responses of sheep experimentally challenged with Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus. Infect. Immun. 71: 147– 154.
40. Harvey, S., and, J. R. Greenwood. 1985. Isolation of Campylobacter fetus from a pet turtle. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21: 260– 261.
41. Harvey, S., and, J. R. Greenwood. 1983. Relationships among catalase-positive Campylobacters determined by deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33: 275– 284.
42. Holt, J. G.,, N. R. Krieg,, P. H. A. Sneath,, J. T. Staley, and, S. T. Williams (ed.). 1994. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed., vol. 1. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
43. Hum, S.,, J. Brunner,, A. McInnes,, G. Mendoza, and, J. Stephens. 1994. Evaluation of cultural methods and selective media for the isolation of Campylobacter fetus subsp venerealis from cattle. Aust. Vet. J. 71: 184– 186.
44. Hum, S.,, K. Quinn,, J. Brunner, and, S. L. W. On. 1997. Evaluation of a PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter fetus subspecies. Aust. Vet. J. 75: 827– 831.
45. Hum, S.,, L. R. Stephens, and, C. Quinn. 1991. Diagnosis by ELISA of bovine abortion due to Campylobacter fetus. Aust. Vet. J. 68: 272– 5.
46. Karmali, M. A.,, A. K. Allen, and, P. C. Fleming. 1981. Differentiation of catalase-positive campylobacters with special reference to morphology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 31: 64– 71.
47. Lander, K. P. 1990. The application of a transport and enrichment medium to the diagnosis of Campylobacter fetus infections in bulls. Br. Vet. J. 146: 334– 340.
48. Leaper, S., and, R. J. Owen. 1981. Identification of catalase-producing Campylobacter species based on biochemical characteristics and on cellular fatty acid composition. Curr. Microbiol. 6: 31.
49. Lecce, J. G. 1958. Some biochemical characteristics of Vibrio fetus and other related Vibrios isolated from animals. J. Bacteriol. 76: 312– 316.
50. Linton, D.,, R. J. Owen, and, J. Stanley. 1996. Rapid identification by PCR of the genus Campylobacter and of five Campylobacter species enteropathogenic for man and animals. Res. Microbiol. 147: 707– 718.
51. Logan, J. M. J.,, K. J. Edwards,, N. A. Saunders, and, J. Stanley. 2001. Rapid identification of Campylobacter spp. by melting peak analysis of biprobes in real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2227– 2232.
52. Mannering, S. A.,, D. M. West,, S. G. Fenwick,, R. M. Marchant,, N. R. Perkins, and, K. O’Connell. 2004. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus isolated from sheep abortions in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 52: 358– 363.
53. McFadyean, J., and, S. Stockman. 1913. Appendix to part III, Abortion in sheep. In Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed by the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries to Inquire into Epizootic Abortion. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
54. McMillen, L.,, G. Fordyce,, V. J. Doogan, and, A. E. Lew. 2006. Comparison of culture and a novel 5′ Taq nuclease assay for direct detection of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis in clinical specimens from cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 938– 945.
55. Meinershagen, W. A.,, D. G. Waldhalm,, F. W. Fank, and, L. H. Scrivner. 1965. Magpies as a reservoir of infection for ovine vibriosis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assn. 147: 843– 845.
56. Metherell, L. A.,, J. M. J. Logan, and, J. Stanley. 1999. PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection and identification of Campylobacter species: application to isolates and stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 433– 435.
57. Mitscherlich, E., and, B. Liess. 1958. Die serologische differzierung von Vibrio fetus-Stämmen. Dtsch. Tierärtzl. Wochenschr. 65: 2– 5, 36– 39.
58. Mohanty, S. B.,, G. J. Plumer, and, J. E. Faber. 1962. Biochemical and colonial characteristics of some bovine vibrios. Am. J. Vet. Res. 23: 554– 557.
59. Monke, H. J.,, B. C. Love,, T. E. Wittum,, D. R. Monke, and, B. A. Byrum. 2002. Effect of transport enrichment medium, transport time, and growth medium on the detection of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 14: 35– 39.
60. Moran, A. P.,, D. T. O’Malley,, T. U. Kosunen, and, I. M. Helander. 1994. Biochemical characterization of Campylobacter fetus lipopolysaccharides. Infect. Immun. 62: 3922– 3929.
61. Morgan, W. J. 1959. Studies on the antigenic structure of Vibrio fetus. J. Comp. Pathol. 69: 125– 140.
62. Morooka, T.,, A. Umeda,, M. Fujita,, H. Matano,, S. Fujimoto,, K. Yukitake,, K. Amako, and, T. Oda. 1996. Epidemiologic application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to an outbreak of Campylobacter fetus meningitis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 28: 269– 270.
63. Moureau, P.,, I. Derclaye,, D. Gregoire,, M. Janssen, and, G. R. Cornelis. 1989. Campylobacter species identification based on polymorphism of DNA encoding rRNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27: 1514– 1517.
64. Muller, W.,, H. Hotzel, and, F. Schulze. 2003. Identification and differentiation of Campylobacter fetus subspecies by PCR. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 110: 55– 59.
65. Newell, D. G.,, B. Duim,, M. A. P. van Bergen,, R. Grogono-Thomas, and, J. A. Wagenaar. 2000a. Speciation, subspeciation and subtyping of Campylobacter spp. associated with bovine infertility and abortion. Cattle Pract. 8: 421– 425.
66. Newell, D. G.,, J. A. Frost,, B. Duim,, J. A. Wagenaar,, R. H. Madden,, J. van der Plas, and, S. L. W. On. 2000b. New developments in the subtyping of Campylobacter species, p. 27– 44. In I. Nachamkin and, M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
67. OIE. 2004. Chapter 2. 3. 2. Bovine Genital Campylobacteriosis, p. 439– 450. In OIE (ed.), Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, 5th ed. World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris.
68. On, S. L. W. 1996. Identification methods for Campylobacters, Helicobacters and related organisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 9: 405– 422.
69. On, S. L. W., and, C. S. Harrington. 2001. Evaluation of numerical analysis of PFGE-DNA profiles for differentiating Campylobacter fetus subspecies by comparison with phenotypic, PCR and 16S rDNA sequencing methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 90: 285– 293.
70. Owen, R. J. 1983. Nucleic acids in the classification of Campylobacters. Eur J. Clin. Microbiol. 2: 367– 377.
71. Oyarzabal, O. A.,, I. V. Wesley,, K. M. Harmon,, L. Schroeder-Tucker,, J. M. Barbaree,, L. H. Lauerman,, S. Backert, and, D. E. Conner. 1997. Specific identification of Campylobacter fetus by PCR targeting variable regions of the 16S rDNA. Vet. Microbiol. 58: 61– 71.
72. Penner, J. L. 1988. The genus Campylobacter: a decade of progress. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1: 157– 172.
73. Perez-Perez, G. I.,, M. J. Blaser, and, J. H. Bryner. 1986. Lipopolysaccharide structures of Campylobacter fetus are related to heat-stable serogroups. Infect. Immun. 51: 209– 212.
74. Plastridge, W. N.,, L. F. Williams, and, D. G. Trowbridge. 1964. Antibiotic sensitivity of physiological groups of microaerophilic vibrios. Am. J. Vet. Res. 25: 1295– 1299.
75. Quinn, P. J.,, M. E. Carter,, M. E. Markey, and, G. R. Carter. 1994. Campylobacter species, p. 268– 272. In P. J. Quinn,, M. E. Carter,, M. E. Markey, and, G. R. Carter (ed.), Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Mosby, London.
76. Rennie, R. P.,, D. Strong,, D. E. Taylor,, S. M. Salama,, C. Davidson, and, H. Tabor. 1994. Campylobacter fetus diarrhea in a Hutterite colony: epidemiological observations and typing of the causative organism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32: 721– 724.
77. Roop, R. M.,, II, R. M. Smibert,, J. L. Johnson, and, N. R. Krieg. 1984. Differential characteristics of catalase-positive Campylobacters correlated with DNA homology groups. Can. J. Microbiol. 30: 938– 951.
78. Salama, S. M.,, M. M. Garcia, and, D. E. Taylor. 1992. Differentiation of the subspecies of Campylobacter fetus by genomic sizing. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42: 446– 450.
79. Schulze, F.,, A. Bagon,, W. Muller, and, H. Hotzel. 2006. Identification of Campylobacter fetus subspecies by phenotypic differentiation and PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2019– 2024.
80. Schurig, G. D.,, C. E. Hall,, K. Burda,, L. B. Corbeil,, J. R. Duncan, and, A. J. Winter. 1973. Persistent genital tract infection with Vibrio fetus intestinalis associated with serotypic alteration of the infecting strain. Am. J. Vet. Res. 34: 1399– 1403.
81. Skerman, V. B. D.,, V. McGowan, and, P. H. A. Sneath. 1980. Approved list of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bact. 30: 225– 420.
82. Smibert, R. M. 1974. Genus II Campylobacter Sebald and Veron 1963, 907, p. 207– 212. In R. E. Buchana and, N. E. Gibbons (ed.), Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
83. Smibert, R. M. 1984. Genus II Campylobacter Sebald and Véron 1963, p. 111– 118. In N. R. Krieg and, H. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
84. Staley, J. T., and, N. R. Krieg. 1984. Classification of procaryotic organisms: an overview, p. 1– 4. In N. R. Krieg and, J. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
85. Stegenga, T., and, J. I. Terpstra. 1949. Over Vibrio fetus infecties bij het rund en “enzoötische” steriliteit. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 74: 293– 296.
86. Thompson, L. M.,, III, R. M. Smibert,, J. L. Johnson and, N. R. Krieg. 1988. Phylogenetic study of the genus Campylobacter. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38: 190– 200.
87. Thompson, S. A., and, M. J. Blaser. 2000. Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fetus infections, p. 321– 347. In I. Nachamkin and, M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter, 2nd. ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
88. Tremblay, C., and, C. Gaudreau. 1998. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 59 strains of Campylobacter fetus susbp. fetus. Anti-microb. Agents Chemother. 42: 1847– 1849.
89. Tremblay, C.,, C. Gaudreau, and, M. Lorange. 2003. Epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibilities of 111 Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus strains isolated in Quebec, Canada, from 1983 to 2000. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 463– 466.
90. Tu, Z.-C.,, F. E. Dewhirst, and, M. J. Blaser. 2001. Evidence that the Campylobacter fetus sap locus is an ancient genomic constituent with origins before mammals and reptiles diverged. Infect. Immun. 69: 2237– 2244.
91. Tu, Z.-C.,, G. Zeitlin,, J-P. Gagner,, T. Keo,, B. A. Hanna, and, M. J. Blaser. 2004. Campylobacter fetus of reptile origin as a human pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4405– 4407.
92. Tu, Z. C.,, W. Eisner,, B. N. Kreiswirth, and, M. J. Blaser. 2005. Genetic divergence of Campylobacter fetus strains of mammal and reptile origins. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3334– 3340.
93. van Bergen, M. A. P. 2005. Subspecies differentiation and typing of Campylobacter fetus. Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
94. van Bergen, M. A. P.,, K. E. Dingle,, M. C. Maiden,, D. G. Newell,, L. van der Graaf-Van Bloois,, J. P. M. van Putten, and, J. A. Wagenaar. 2005a. Clonal nature of Campylobacter fetus as defined by multilocus sequence typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5888– 98.
95. van Bergen, M. A. P.,, S. Linnane,, J. P. M. van Putten, and, J. A. Wagenaar. 2005b. Global detection and identification of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. Rev. Sci. Tech. 24: 1017– 26.
96. van Bergen, M. A. P.,, G. Simons,, L. van der Graaf-van Bloois,, J. P. M. van Putten,, J. Rombout,, I. Wesley, and, J. A. Wagenaar. 2005c. Amplified fragment length polymorphism based identification of genetic markers and novel PCR assay for differentiation of Campylobacter fetus subspecies. J. Med. Microbiol. 54: 1217– 24.
97. Vandamme, P. 2000. Taxonomy of the family Campylobacteraceae, p. 3– 26. In I. Nachamkin and, M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
98. Vandamme, P.,, B. Pot,, E. Falsen,, K. Kersters, and, J. De Ley. 1990. Intra- and interspecific relationships of veterinary Campylobacters revealed by numerical analysis of electrophoretic protein profiles and DNA:DNA hybridizations. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 13: 295– 303.
99. Varga, J.,, B. Mezes,, L. Fodor, and, I. Hajtos. 1990. Serogroups of Campylobacter fetus and Campylobacter jejuni isolated in cases of ovine abortion. Zbl. Vet. Med. B 37: 148– 152.
100. Vargas, A. C.,, M. M. Costa,, M. H. Vainstein,, L. C. Kreutz, and, J. P. Neves. 2003. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of bovine Campylobacter fetus strains isolated in Brazil. Vet. Microbiol. 93: 121– 132.
101. Véron, M., and, R. Chatelain. 1973. Taxonomic study of the genus Campylobacter Sebald and Véron and designation of the neotype strain for the type species, Campylobacter fetus (Smith and Taylor) Sebald and Véron. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 23: 122– 134.
102. Wagenaar, J. A.,, M. A. P. van Bergen,, D. G. Newell,, R. Grogono-Thomas, and, B. Duim. 2001. Comparative study using amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting, PCR genotyping, and phenotyping to differentiate Campylobacter fetus strains isolated from animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2283– 2286.
103. Wang, E.,, M. M. Garcia,, M. S. Blake,, Z. H. Pei, and, M. J. Blaser. 1993. Shift in S-layer protein expression responsible for antigenic variation in Campylobacter fetus. J. Bacteriol. 175: 4979– 4984.
104. Wang, G.,, C. G. Clark,, T. M. Taylor,, C. Pucknell,, C. Barton,, L. Price,, D. L. Woodward, and, F. G. Rodgers. 2002. Colony multiplex PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis and C. fetus subsp. fetus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4744– 4747.
105. Watson, W. A.,, D. Hunter, and, R. Bellhouse. 1967. Studies on vibrionic infection of sheep and carrion crows. Vet. Rec. 81: 220– 226.
106. Wayne, L. G.,, D. J. Brenner,, R. R. Colwell,, P. A. D. Grimont,, P. Kandler,, M. I. Krichevsky,, L. H. Moore,, W. E. C. Moore,, R. G. E. Murray,, E. Stackebrandt,, M. P. Starr, and, H. G. Trüper. 1987. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37: 463– 464.
107. Wesley, I. V.,, R. D. Wesley,, M. Cardella,, F. E. Dewhirst, and, B. J. Paster. 1991. Oligodeoxynucleotide probes for Campylobacter fetus and Campylobacter hyointestinalis based on 16S rRNA sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29: 1812– 1817.
108. Willoughby, K.,, P. F. Nettleton,, M. Quirie,, M. A. Maley,, G. Foster,, M. Toszeghy, and, D. G. Newell. 2005. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction to detect and differentiate Campylobacter fetus subspecies fetus and Campylobacter fetus subspecies venerealis: use on UK isolates of Campylobacter fetus and other Campylobacter spp. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99: 758– 766.
109. Yang, L. Y.,, Z. H. Pei,, S. Fujimoto, and, M. J. Blaser. 1992. Reattachment of surface array proteins to Campylobacter fetus cells. J. Bacteriol. 174: 1258– 1267.

Tables

Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of Campylobacter fetus
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-1,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Marcel A. P., foaf_name=Marcel A. P. van Bergen, foaf_surname=van Bergen, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-2,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-2,properties={foaf_givenname=Jos P. M., foaf_name=Jos P. M. van Putten, foaf_surname=van Putten, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff2]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-3,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-3,properties={foaf_givenname=Kate E., foaf_name=Kate E. Dingle, foaf_surname=Dingle, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff3]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-4,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-4,properties={foaf_givenname=Martin J., foaf_name=Martin J. Blaser, foaf_surname=Blaser, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff4]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-5,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-5,properties={foaf_givenname=Jaap A., foaf_name=Jaap A. Wagenaar, foaf_surname=Wagenaar, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11-aff5]]}]]
Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
/content/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11.ch11tab01
Table 1.
Overview of the subspecies and their host preference and their clinical importance
Generic image for table
Table 1.

Overview of the subspecies and their host preference and their clinical importance

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11
/content/10.1128/9781555815554.ch11.ch11tab02
Table 2.
Comparison of historic classification and nomenclature of
Generic image for table
Table 2.

Comparison of historic classification and nomenclature of

Citation: van Bergen M, van Putten J, Dingle K, Blaser M, Wagenaar J. 2008. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of , p 213-225. In Nachamkin I, Szymanski C, Blaser M (ed), , Third Edition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555815554.ch11

Back to top
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error