The Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel MscS and Its Extended Family

Paul Blount; Irene Iscla; Yuezhou Li; Paul C. Moe

doi:10.1128/9781555816452.ch12

Chapter 12 : The Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel MscS and Its Extended Family

Authors: Paul Blount¹, Irene Iscla¹, Yuezhou Li¹, Paul C. Moe¹

VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS

Affiliations: 1: Department of Physiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9040

Content Type: Monograph

Publication Year: 2005

Category: Bacterial Pathogenesis; Microbial Genetics and Molecular Biology

Book DOI: 10.1128/9781555816452

Chapter DOI: 10.1128/9781555816452.ch12

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:

The Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel MscS and Its Extended Family, Page 1 of 2

< Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555816452/9781555813284_Chap12-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555816452/9781555813284_Chap12-2.gif

Abstract:

Early studies of channels within Escherichia coli native membranes defined many of the fundamental properties of bacterial mechanosensitive channel (MS) channel activities. The observed activity was reported to be modulated, but not gated, by voltage, and a subsequent study demonstrated that amphipaths that intercalate into the membrane asymmetrically can modulate the sensitivity of the channel. The mscS gene family was discovered by classical genetics. The structure of E. coli MscS was solved to 3.9-Å resolution by X-ray crystallography, residues 27 to 280 were resolved. On the other hand, this study used only molecular simulation to model the permeation of the pore, an approach that inherently entertains many assumptions. As implied by some studies, the MscS extended family is not confined to E. coli. A survey of some of the MscS family members from archaea has shown researchers just how diverse the activities encoded by family members can be in conductance, sensitivity, and ionic preference; some homologs even demonstrate cationic rather than anionic preferences. The MscS-like family of channels is extremely large and diverse. In its most streamlined form, e.g., MscS in E. coli, it has many similarities with its counterpart, MscL. It appears to directly sense membrane tension, and it appears to utilize modification of transmembrane (TM) domains tilt and rotation in its gating sequence. Because the MscS and MscL families are so far removed from each other, these preserved features may reflect conserved mechanisms found in many MS channel families.

Citation: Blount P, Iscla I, Li Y, Moe P. 2005. The Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel MscS and Its Extended Family, p 247-258. In Kubalski A, Martinac B (ed), Bacterial Ion Channels and Their Eukaryotic Homologs. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555816452.ch12

Key Concept Ranking

Mechanosensitive Channels: 0.65177137
Ion Channels: 0.5170115
MscS Protein: 0.50960416

0.65177137

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide

Full text loading...

Figures

The Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel MscS and Its Extended Family

[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-1,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Paul, foaf_name=Paul Blount, foaf_surname=Blount, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-2,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-2,properties={foaf_givenname=Irene, foaf_name=Irene Iscla, foaf_surname=Iscla, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-3,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-3,properties={foaf_givenname=Yuezhou, foaf_name=Yuezhou Li, foaf_surname=Li, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-4,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-4,properties={foaf_givenname=Paul C., foaf_name=Paul C. Moe, foaf_surname=Moe, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12-aff1]]}]]

/content/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12.fig12-1

Figure 1.

A typical trace obtained from an excised patch from native E. coli membranes. Giant spheroplasts were generated as previously described ( Blount et al., 1999 ). The top trace is the channel activity, while the bottom shows the pressure (negative relative to atmospheric). The strain used is derived from MJF431 ( Levina et al., 1999 ), which is null for mscS and mscK activities. MscS activity was replaced in trans using a pB10 expression vector ( Blount et al., 1999 ). Note the long open-dwell times and the inactivation of the activity with time. Recording conditions were as described ( Blount et al., 1999 ), pH 7.0 and −20 mV in the pipette channel openings are shown as upward for convenience; the closed (C) and open (O1 to O6) states are labeled to the left.

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-1_thmb.gif

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-1.gif

Figure 1.

/content/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12.fig12-2

Figure 2.

Hydrophilicity plots of MscK (top) and MscS (bottom). The scale bar is in amino acids. Note that MscK is much larger than MscS and that it is the C terminus of MscK that shows homology. The three TM domains of MscS (and last three of MscK) are indicated by gray boxes between the plots. Proximal to the homologous region, MscK contains an N-terminal periplasmic domain (which is labeled) and eight additional TM domains.

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-2_thmb.gif

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-2.gif

Figure 2.

/content/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12.fig12-3

Figure 3.

The structure and pore design of the MscS channel. The model shown is derived from X-ray crystallographic data ( Bass et al., 2002 ). The side (top panels) and top (bottom panels) views are shown. One subunit of the homoheptamer is shown in darker gray for distinction; the pore-forming third TM domain of this subunit is in black (the bracketed arrows point to this TM region). The heptameric (center) and simple trimeric (right; the obstructing subunit structures have been removed) structures are shown. Note the tight packing of the glycines (black CPK residues) and alanines (gray CPK residues) of the three subunits in the right panel.

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-3_thmb.gif

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-3.gif

Figure 3.

/content/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12.fig12-4

Figure 4.

A cartoon depicting the current model for the structural rearrangements thought to occur upon closure of the MscS channel. Note that it is thought that it is the open (or inactivated) state of the channel whose structure was solved in the crystallographic study ( Bass et al., 2002 ). The three TM domains are within the bilayer depicted by gray horizontal lines. Note that there are nine pores: one in the bilayer formed by TM3, seven at the interface of the subunits within the cytoplasmic cage, and one at the extreme cytoplasmic tip. Evidence suggests that each of these may constrict upon closure of the channel ( Koprowski and Kubalski, 2003 ; Miller et al., 2003b ; Edwards et al., 2005 ).

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-4_thmb.gif

10.1128/9781555816452/fig12-4.gif

Figure 4.

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555816452.chap12

1. Anishkin, A.,, and S. Sukharev. 2004. Water dynamics and dewetting transitions in the small mechanosensitive channel MscS. Biophys. J. 86: 2883– 2895.

2. Bartlett, J. L.,, Levin, G.,, and Blount, P. 2004. An in vivo assay identifies changes in residue accessibility on mechanosensitive channel gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 10161– 10165.

3. Bass, R. B.,, P. Strop,, M. Barclay,, and D. C. Rees. 2002. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a voltagemodulated and mechanosensitive channel. Science 298: 1582– 1587.

4. Berrier, C.,, M. Besnard,, B. Ajouz,, A. Coulombe,, and A. Ghazi. 1996. Multiple mechanosensitive ion channels from Escherichia coli, activated at different thresholds of applied pressure. J. Membr. Biol. 151: 175– 187.

5. Blount, P. 2003. Molecular mechanisms of mechanosensation: big lessons from small cells. Neuron 37: 731– 734.

6. Blount, P.,, and P. Moe. 1999. Bacterial mechanosensitive channels: integrating physiology, structure and function. Trends Microbiol. 7: 420– 424.

7. Blount, P.,, S. I. Sukharev,, P. C. Moe,, B. Martinac,, and C. Kung,. 1999. Mechanosensitive channels of bacteria, p. 458– 482. In P. M. Conn (ed.), Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

8. Blount, P.,, S. I. Sukharev,, P. C. Moe,, M. J. Schroeder,, H. R. Guy,, and C. Kung. 1996. Membrane topology and multimeric structure of a mechanosensitive channel protein of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 15: 4798– 4805.

9. Britten, R. J.,, and F. T. McClure. 1962. The amino acid pool in Escherichia coli. Bacteriol. Rev. 26: 292– 335.

10. Cheung, K. J.,, V. Badarinarayana,, D. W. Selinger,, D. Janse,, and G. M. Church. 2003. A microarray-based antibiotic screen identifies a regulatory role for supercoiling in the osmotic stress response of Escherichia coli. Genome Res. 13: 206– 215.

11. Chiang, C. S.,, A. Anishkin,, and S. Sukharev. 2004. Gating of the large mechanosensitive channel in situ: estimation of the spatial scale of the transition from channel population responses. Biophys. J. 86: 2846– 2861.

12. Cui, C.,, D. O. Smith,, and J. Adler. 1995. Characterization of mechanosensitive channels in Escherichia coli cytoplasmic membrane by whole-cell patch clamp recording. J. Membr. Biol. 144: 31– 42.

13. Dinnbier, U.,, E. Limpinsel,, R. Schmid,, and E. P. Bakker. 1988. Transient accumulation of potassium glutamate and its replacement by trehalose during adaptation of growing cells of Escherichia coli K-12 to elevated sodium chloride concentrations. Arch. Microbiol. 150: 348– 357.

14. Edwards, M. D.,, I. R. Booth,, and S. Miller. 2004. Gating the bacterial mechanosensitive channels: MscS a new paradigm? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7: 163– 167.

15. Edwards, M. D.,, Y. Li,, S. Kim,, S. Miller,, W. Bartlett,, I. Iscla,, P. Blount,, J. U. Bowie,, and I. R. Booth. 2005. Pivotal role of the glycine-rich TM3 helix in gating the MscS mechanosensitive channel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12: 113– 119.

16. Häse, C. C.,, A. C. Le Dain,, and B. Martinac. 1995. Purification and functional reconstitution of the recombinant large mechanosensitive ion channel (MscL) of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 18329– 18334.

17. Jiang, Y.,, A. Lee,, J. Chen,, V. Ruta,, M. Cadene,, B. T. Chait,, and R. MacKinnon. 2003. X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel. Nature 423: 33– 41.

18. Kloda, A.,, and B. Martinac. 2001a. Mechanosensitive channel of Thermoplasma, the cell wall-less archaea: cloning and molecular characterization. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 34: 321– 347.

19. Kloda, A.,, and B. Martinac. 2001b. Mechanosensitive channels in archaea. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 34: 349– 381.

20. Kloda, A.,, and B. Martinac. 2001c. Molecular identification of a mechanosensitive channel in archaea. Biophys. J. 80: 229– 240.

21. Kloda, A.,, and B. Martinac. 2001d. Structural and functional differences between two homologous mechanosensitive channels of Methanococcus jannaschii. EMBO J. 20: 1888– 1896.

22. Kloda, A.,, and B. Martinac. 2002. Common evolutionary origins of mechanosensitive ion channels in archaea, bacteria and cell-walled eukarya. Archaea 1: 35– 44.

23. Koprowski, P.,, and A. Kubalski. 1998. Voltage-independent adaptation of mechanosensitive channels in Escherichia coli protoplasts. J. Membr. Biol. 164: 253– 262.

24. Koprowski, P.,, and A. Kubalski. 2003. C termini of the Escherichia coli mechanosensitive ion channel (MscS) move apart upon the channel opening. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 11237– 11245.

25. Levina, N.,, S. Totemeyer,, N. R. Stokes,, P. Louis,, M. A. Jones,, and I. R. Booth. 1999. Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO J. 18: 1730– 1737.

26. Li, Y.,, P. C. Moe,, S. Chandrasekaran,, I. R. Booth,, and P. Blount. 2002. Ionic regulation of MscK, a mechanosensitive channel from Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 21: 5323– 5330.

27. Martinac, B. 2004. Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci. 117: 2449– 2460.

28. Martinac, B.,, J. Adler,, and C. Kung. 1990. Mechanosensitive ion channels of E. coli activated by amphipaths. Nature 348: 261– 263.

29. Martinac, B.,, M. Buechner,, A. H. Delcour,, J. Adler,, and C. Kung. 1987. Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 2297– 2301.

30. McLaggan, D.,, M. A. Jones,, G. Gouesbet,, N. Levina,, S. Lindey,, W. Epstein,, and I. R. Booth. 2002. Analysis of the kefA2 mutation suggests that KefA is a cation-specific channel involved in osmotic adaptation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 43: 521– 536.

31. Miller, S.,, W. Bartlett,, S. Chandrasekaran,, S. Simpson,, M. Edwards,, and I. R. Booth. 2003a. Domain organization of the MscS mechanosensitive channel of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 22: 36– 46.

32. Miller, S.,, M. D. Edwards,, C. Ozdemir,, and I. R. Booth. 2003b. The closed structure of the MscS mechanosensitive channel. Cross-linking of single cysteine mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 32246– 32250.

33. Nottebrock, D.,, U. Meyer,, R. Kramer,, and S. Morbach. 2003. Molecular and biochemical characterization of mechanosensitive channels in Corynebacterium glutamicum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 218: 305– 309.

34. Okada, K.,, P. C. Moe,, and P. Blount. 2002. Functional design of bacterial mechanosensitive channels. Comparisons and contrasts illuminated by random mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 27682– 27688.

35. Ou, X.,, P. Blount,, R. J. Hoffman,, and C. Kung. 1998. One face of a transmembrane helix is crucial in mechanosensitive channel gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 11471– 11475.

36. Perozo, E.,, D. M. Cortes,, P. Sompornpisut,, A. Kloda,, and B. Martinac. 2002a. Open channel structure of MscL and the gating mechanism of mechanosensitive channels. Nature 418: 942– 948.

37. Perozo, E.,, A. Kloda,, D. M. Cortes,, and B. Martinac. 2002b. Physical principles underlying the transduction of bilayer deformation forces during mechanosensitive channel gating. Nature Struct Biol. 9: 696– 703.

38. Pivetti, C. D.,, M. R. Yen,, S. Miller,, W. Busch,, Y. H. Tseng,, I. R. Booth,, and M. H. Saier. 2003. Two families of mechanosensitive channel proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67: 66– 85.

39. Poolman, B.,, P. Blount,, J. H. Folgering,, R. H. Friesen,, P. C. Moe,, and T. van der Heide. 2002. How do membrane proteins sense water stress? Mol. Microbiol. 44: 889– 902.

40. Schumann, U.,, M. D. Edwards,, C. Li,, and I. R. Booth. 2004. The conserved carboxy-terminus of the MscS mechanosensitive channel is not essential but increases stability and activity. FEBS Lett. 572: 233– 237.

41. Stokes, N. R.,, H. D. Murray,, C. Subramaniam,, R. L. Gourse,, P. Louis,, W. Bartlett,, S. Miller,, and I. R. Booth. 2003. A role for mechanosensitive channels in survival of stationary phase: regulation of channel expression by RpoS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 15959– 15964.

42. Sukharev, S. 2002. Purification of the small mechanosensitive channel of Escherichia coli (MscS): the subunit structure, conduction, and gating characteristics in liposomes. Biophys. J. 83: 290– 298.

43. Sukharev, S.,, S. Durell,, and H. Guy. 2001. Structural models of the MscL gating mechanism. Biophys. J. 81: 917– 936.

44. Sukharev, S. I.,, B. Martinac,, V. Y. Arshavsky,, and C. Kung. 1993. Two types of mechanosensitive channels in the Escherichia coli cell envelope: solubilization and functional reconstitution. Biophys. J. 65: 177– 183.

45. Sukharev, S. I.,, W. J. Sigurdson,, C. Kung,, and F. Sachs. 1999. Energetic and spatial parameters for gating of the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel, MscL. J. Gen. Physiol. 113: 525– 540.

46. Tavernarakis, N.,, and M. Driscoll. 1997. Molecular modeling of mechanotransduction in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59: 659– 689.

47. Touze, T.,, G. Gouesbet,, C. Bolangiu,, M. Jebbar,, S. Bonnassie,, and C. Blanco. 2001. Glycine betaine loses its osmoprotective activity in a bspA strain of Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol. Microbiol. 42: 87– 99.

48. Yoshimura, K.,, A. Batiza,, M. Schroeder,, P. Blount,, and C. Kung. 1999. Hydrophilicity of a single residue within MscL correlates with increased channel mechanosensitivity. Biophys. J. 77: 1960– 1972.

49. Zhou, X.,, and C. Kung. 1992. A mechanosensitive ion channel in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 11: 2869– 2875.