1887

Chapter 48 : Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support

Author: Michael D. D. McNeely
Content Type: Reference
Publication Year: 2004

Category: Clinical Microbiology

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Zoom in
Zoomout

Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817695/9781555812799_Chap48-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1128/9781555817695/9781555812799_Chap48-2.gif

Abstract:

Clinical pathology practice has emphasized the accuracy, precision, convenience, turnaround time, and cost of performing tests. It is entering a new era where correct test selection and result interpretation will become the dominant challenge. The fundamental technology that will be used is known as knowledge support (or clinical decision support). Electronic knowledge support is computer software that is able to present key factual information in such a way that it speeds or enhances the accuracy of a clinical decision. This chapter introduces the concept of knowledge support. It explains why knowledge support will be necessary to control utilization and standardize care. The chapter presents some current examples of knowledge support for laboratory ordering and interpretation and introduces the information complexity that will come with molecular genetic testing. The study by Carl van Walraven et al. shows that ordering protocols do actually work to decrease utilization across an entire population area. Internet technology will provide the conduit for either updating handheld devices or allowing continuous linkage to the World Wide Web or to an institution’s intranet. Laboratory ordering protocols are a specific, and rather rigid, instance of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that can be described as evidence-based, consensus-approved pathways for quality medical care in selected situations. Data mining is the practice wherein large organized repositories of information (databases) are examined to extract knowledge.

Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48

Key Concept Ranking

Hepatitis B
0.53333336
Coronary Artery Disease
0.5203167
Disease Management
0.49814782
Drug Therapy
0.42508557
0.53333336
Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Figures

Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48-1,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Michael D. D., foaf_name=Michael D. D. McNeely, foaf_surname=McNeely}]]
Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48
/content/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48.fig48-1
Figure 48.1

PDA menu for the LAS system showing the four program options.

10.1128/9781555817695/fig48-1_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555817695/fig48-1.gif
Image of Figure 48.1
Figure 48.1

PDA menu for the LAS system showing the four program options.

Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
/content/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48.fig48-2
Figure 48.2

An example ordering screen from the LAS system that shows how clinical features are collected prior to ordering tests to investigate a possible autoimmune disorder.

10.1128/9781555817695/fig48-2_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555817695/fig48-2.gif
Image of Figure 48.2
Figure 48.2

An example ordering screen from the LAS system that shows how clinical features are collected prior to ordering tests to investigate a possible autoimmune disorder.

Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint
/content/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48.fig48-3
Figure 48.3

An example LAS result presentation. The test results are in the upper window. The interpretation is in the lower window. Both windows can be scrolled.

10.1128/9781555817695/fig48-3_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555817695/fig48-3.gif
Image of Figure 48.3
Figure 48.3

An example LAS result presentation. The test results are in the upper window. The interpretation is in the lower window. Both windows can be scrolled.

Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48
Permissions and Reprints Request Permissions
Download as Powerpoint

References

/content/book/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48
1. Bronzino, J. D.,, R. A. Morelli,, and J. W. Goethe. 1989. OVERSEER: a prototype expert system for monitoring drug treatment in the psychiatric clinic. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36: 533– 540.
2. Button, K. F.,, and S. R. Gambino. 1973. Laboratory diagnosis by computer. Comput. Biol.Med. 3: 131– 136.
3. Cabana, M. D.,, C. S. Rand,, N. R. Powe,, A. W. Wu,, M. H. Wilson,, P.-A. C. Abboud,, and H. R. Rubin. 1999. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines: a framework for improvement. JAMA 282: 1458– 1465.
4. Chang, E.,, M. McNeely,, and K. Gamble. 1984. Strategies for choosing the next test in an expert system. Proc. AAMSI Congr. 1984: 198– 202.
5. Connelly, D. P.,, K. E. Willard,, and J. H. Hallgren. 1996. Closing the clinical laboratory testing loop with information technology. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 105( 4 Suppl. 1): S40– S47.
6. Dark, R. L. 2001. New products for lab test results reporting via Web. Dark Rep. Feb. 26 8(3): 6– 10.
7. Davenport, T. H.,, and J. Glaser. 2002. Just-in-time delivery comes to knowledge management. Harv. Bus. Rev. 80: 107– 111.
8. Delamothe, T. 1993. Wanted: guidelines that doctors will follow. Br.Med. J. 307: 218.
9. Dixon, R. H.,, and J. Laszlo. 1974. Utilisation of clinical chemistry services by medical house staff. Arch. Intern.Med. 134: 1064– 1067.
10. Ebell, M. H.,, D. L. Gaspar,, and S. Khurana. 1997. Family physicians’ preferences for computerized decision-support hardware and software. J. Fam. Pract. 45: 137– 141.
11. Elson, R.,, and D. T. Connelly. 1998. Applications of computerbased clinical guidelines. JAMA 279: 989– 990.
12. Emerson. J. F.,, and S. S. Emerson. 2002. The impact of requisition design on laboratory utilization. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 116: 879– 884.
13. Evans, R. S.,, D. C. Classen,, S. L. Pestotnik,, H. P. Lundsgaarde,, and J. P. Burke. 1994. Improving empiric antibiotic selection using computer decision support. Arch. Intern.Med. 154: 878– 884.
14. Everett, G. D.,, S. de Blois,, P. F. Chang,, and T. Holets. 1983. Effect of cost education, cost audits and faculty chart review on the use of laboratory services. Arch. Intern.Med. 143: 942– 944.
15. Finn, A. F.,, T. N. Valenstein,, and M. D. Burke. 1988. Alteration of physician’s test orders by non-physicians. JAMA 259: 2549– 2552.
16. Fowkes, F. G. R. 1985. Containing the use of diagnostic tests. BMJ 290: 488– 489.
17. Fraser, C. G.,, and F. P. Woodford. 1987. Strategies to modify the test-requesting patterns of clinicians. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 24: 223– 231.
18. Hardwick, D. F.,, J. L. Morrison,, J. Tydeman,, P. A. Cassidy,, and W. H. Chase. 1982. Structuring complexity of testing: a process oriented approach to limiting unnecessary laboratory use. Am. J. Med. Technol. 48: 605– 608.
19. Hartley, R. M.,, A. M. Epstein,, C. M. Harris,, and B. J. McNeil. 1987. Differences in ambulatory test ordering in England and America: role of doctors’ beliefs and attitudes. Am. J. Med. 82: 513– 517.
20. Hutchinson, B.,, C. A. Woodward,, G. R. Norman,, J. Abelson,, and J. A. Brown. 1998. Provision of preventive care to unannounced standardized patients. Can.Med. Assoc. J. 158: 185– 193.
21. James, B. C. 2001. Making it easy to do right. N. Engl. J. Med. 345: 991– 993.
22.K/DOQI Working Group. 2002. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 39( 2 Suppl. 2): S1– S246.
23. Lundberg, G. D. 1983. Laboratory request forms (menus) that guide and teach. JAMA 249: 3075.
24. Marshall, W. J.,, and G. S. Challand. 2000. Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 37: 758– 763.
25. Martin, A. R.,, W. A. Wolf,, L. A. Thibodeau,, V. Dzau,, and E. Braunwald. 1980. A trial of two strategies to modify the testordering behavior of medical residents. N. Engl. J. Med. 303: 1330– 1336.
26. McAlister, F. A.,, K. T. Koon,, R. Z. Lewanczuk,, G. Wells,, and T. J. Montague. 1997. Contemporary practice patterns in the management of newly diagnosed hypertension. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 157: 23– 30.
27. McDonald, C. J.,, S. L. Hui,, and D. M. Smith. 1976. Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. Ann. Intern.Med. 84: 162– 167.
28. McNeely, M. D. D., 1982. LABDOC: a microcomputer-based system for providing interpretations of clinical laboratory tests, p. 316– 320. In B. I. Blum (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
29. McNeely, M. D. D. 1983. Computerized interpretation of laboratory tests: an overview of systems, basic principles and techniques. Clin. Biochem. 16: 141– 146.
30. McNeely, M. D. D.,, D. P. Connelly,, and M. A. M. van Wijk. 2001. Assisting clinicians with ordering and interpretation of laboratory investigations. Clin. Chem. 47(Suppl.): S33– S34.
31. McNeely, M. D. D. 2002. The use of ordering protocols and other maneuvers: the Canadian experience. Clin. Lab.Med. 22: 505– 514.
32. Mutimer, D.,, B. McCauley,, P. Nightingale,, M. Ryan,, M. Peters,, and J. Neuberger. 1992. Computerized protocols for laboratory investigations and their effect on use of medical time and resources. J. Clin. Pathol. 45: 572– 574.
33. Myers, J. D. 1986. The computer as a diagnostic consultant with emphasis on use of laboratory data. Clin. Chem. 32: 1714– 1718.
34. Nguyen D. T.,, L. W. Diamond,, J. D. Cavenagh,, R. Parameswaran,, and J. A. Amess. 1997. Haematological validation of a computer-based bone marrow reporting system. J. Clin. Pathol. 50: 375– 378.
35. Peters, M.,, P. M. G. Broughton,, and P. G. Nightingale. 1991. Use of information technology for auditing effective use of laboratory services. J. Clin. Pathol. 41: 539– 542.
36. Peters, M.,, and P. M. G. Broughton. 1993. The role of expert systems in improving the test requesting patterns of clinicians. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 30: 52– 59.
37. Poikonen, J. 1997. Arden Syntax: the emerging standard language for representing medical knowledge in computer systems. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 54: 281– 284.
38. Pribor, H. C. 1989. Expert systems in laboratory medicine: a practical consultative application. J.Med. Syst. 13: 103– 109.
39. Pryor, T. A. 1994. The use of medical logic modules at LDS hospital. Comput. Biol.Med. 24: 391– 395.
40. Reece, R. L.,, and R. K. Hobbie. 1972. Computer evaluation of chemistry values: a reporting and diagnostic aid. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 57: 664– 675.
41. Sherwood, P.,, I. Lyburn,, S. Brown,, and S. Ryder. 2001. How are abnormal results for liver function tests dealt with in primary care? Audit of yield and impact. BMJ 322: 276– 278.
42. Sinclair, A. 2002. Genetics 101: detecting mutations in human genes. Can.Med. Assoc. J. 167: 275– 279.
43. Smith, B. J.,, and M. D. McNeely. 1999. The influence of an expert system for test ordering and interpretation on laboratory investigations. Clin. Chem. 45: 1168– 1175.
44. Stead, W. W.,, A. J. Olsen,, S. A. Benner,, M. Blackwelder,, L. Cooperstock,, J. A. Paton,, F. K. Russell,, and P. Van Hine. 1997. The IAIMS—an essential infrastructure for increasing the competitiveness of health care practices. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 4( 2 Suppl.): S73– S76.
45. Tierney, W. M.,, M. E. Miller,, and C. J. McDonald. 1990. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. N. Engl. J.Med. 322: 1499– 1504.
46. Van Lente, F.,, W. Castellani,, D. Chou,, R. N. Matzen,, and R. S. Galen. 1986. Application of an EXPERT consultation system to accelerated laboratory testing and interpretation. Clin. Chem. 32: 1719– 1725.
47. van Walraven, C.,, V. Goel,, and B. Chan. 1998. Effect of population- based interventions on laboratory utilization: a time-series analysis. JAMA 280: 2028– 2033.
48. Van Wijk, M. A. M.,, J. van der Lei,, M. Mosseveld,, A. M. Bohnen,, and J. H. van Bemmel. 2002. Compliance of general practitioners with a guideline-based decision support system for ordering blood tests. Clin. Chem. 48: 55– 60.
49. Vasikaran, S. D.,, L. Penberthy,, J. Gill,, S. Scott,, and K. A. Sikaris. 2002. Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative comments.
50. Young, D. W. 1988. Improving laboratory usage: a review. Postgrad. Med. J. 64: 283– 289.

Tables

Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48-1,webId=/content/author/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Michael D. D., foaf_name=Michael D. D. McNeely, foaf_surname=McNeely}]]
Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48
/content/10.1128/9781555817695.chap48.tab48-1
Table 48.1

Summary of utilization measures

10.1128/9781555817695/tab48-1_thmb.gif
10.1128/9781555817695/tab48-1.gif
Generic image for table
Table 48.1

Summary of utilization measures

Citation: McNeely M. 2004. Computers, Utilization, and Knowledge Support, p 781-791. In Garcia L, Baselski V, Burke M, Schwab D, Sewell D, Steele J, Weissfeld A, Wilkinson D, Winn W (ed), Clinical Laboratory Management. ASM Press, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555817695.ch48

Back to top
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error