1887

Towards Improving the Integration of Undergraduate Biology and Mathematics Education

    Author: Christopher Bergevin1,*
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85705
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 20 May 2010
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing adress: Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210089, Tucson, AZ 85705-0089; Phone: (520) 626–0655. Fax: (520) 621–8322. E-mail: [email protected].
    • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2010 vol. 11 no. 1 28-33. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v11.i1.134
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • XML
  • HTML
    43.73 Kb
  • PDF
    205.55 Kb

    Abstract:

    Arguments have recently asserted the need for change in undergraduate biology education, particularly with regard to the role of mathematics. The crux of these protests is that rapidly developing technology is expanding the types of measurements and subsequent data available to biologists. Thus future generations of biologists will require a set of quantitative and analytic skills that will allow them to handle these types of data in order to tackle relevant questions of interest. In this spirit, we describe here strategies (or lessons learned) for undergraduate educators with regard to better preparing undergraduate biology majors for the new types of challenges that lay ahead. The topics covered here span a broad range, from classroom approaches to the administrative level (e.g., fostering inter-departmental communication, student advising) and beyond. A key theme here is the need for an attitude shift with regard to mathematics education by both students and faculty alike. Such a shift will facilitate the development and implementation of new teaching strategies with regard to improving integration of mathematics and biology pedagogy.

Key Concept Ranking

Diffusion
0.75
Lead
0.75
Stems
0.65802103
Oxygen
0.625
Roots
0.5654605
0.75

References & Citations

1. Abbott LF 2008 Theoretical neuroscience rising Neuron 60 489 495 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.019 18995824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.019
2. Bao L, Cai T, Koenig K, Fang K, Han J, Wang J, et al 2009 Learning and scientific reasoning Science 323 586 587 10.1126/science.1167740 19179514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1167740
3. Batschelet E 1979 Introduction to mathematics for life scientists 3rd ed Springer Berlin Heidleberg 10.1007/978-3-642-61869-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61869-7
4. Bender C, Ward S, Wells MA 1994 Improving undergraduate biology education in a large research university Mol Biol Cell 5 129 134 8018999
5. Bialek W, Botstein D 2004 Introductory science and mathematics education for 21st-century biologists Science 303 788 790 10.1126/science.1095480 14764865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095480
6. Bio 2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists 2003 Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century National Research Council The National Academies Press Washington, D.C
7. Courant R, Robbins H 1941 What is mathematics?: An elementary approach to ideas and methods Oxford University Press New York, NY
8. de Vries G, Hillen T, Lewis M, Müller J, Schönfisch B 2006 A course in mathematical biology SIAM Philadelphia, PA 10.1137/1.9780898718256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718256
9. Edelstein-Keshet L 2005 Mathematical models in biology SIAM Philadelphia, PA 10.1137/1.9780898719147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719147
10. Gardiner A 2008 The Princeton companion to mathematics, Part VIII, Section VIII.1 955 966 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
11. Gross LJ 2004 Interdisciplinarity and the undergraduate biology curriculum: Finding a Balance Cell Biol Ed 3 85 92 10.1187/cbe.04-03-0040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-03-0040
12. Hobbie RK 1997 Biological Physics Series. Intermediate physics for medicine and biology 3rd ed AIP Press Melville, N.Y.
13. Faculty Programs Institutes Available from: (http://www.facultyprograms.org/index.html)
14. Keener J, Sneyd J 1998 Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol 8 Mathematical physiology Springer New York, NY
15. Mahalingam M, Schaefer F, Morlino E 2008 Promoting student learning through group problem solving in genera chemistry recitations J Chem Ed 85 1577 1581 10.1021/ed085p1577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed085p1577
16. Mazur E 2009 Farewell, lecture? Science 323 50 51 10.1126/science.1168927 19119207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1168927
17. Murray JD 1993 Biomathematics, vol 19 Mathematical biology 2nd ed Springer New York, NY
18. Mathematical Biosciences Institute Ohio State University Available from: http://mbi.osu.edu/
19. Polya G 1945 How to solve it Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford
20. Purves WK, Sadava D, Orians GH, Heller HC 2001 Life: The science of biology 6th ed Sinauer Associates Inc New York, NY
21. Timmer J Should biologists study computer science? 2009 Available from: (http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/07/should-biologists-study-computer-science.ars)
22. Weiss TF 1996 Cellular biophysics, vol 1 MIT Press Cambridge, MA

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v11.i1.134
2010-05-20
2019-10-23

Abstract:

Arguments have recently asserted the need for change in undergraduate biology education, particularly with regard to the role of mathematics. The crux of these protests is that rapidly developing technology is expanding the types of measurements and subsequent data available to biologists. Thus future generations of biologists will require a set of quantitative and analytic skills that will allow them to handle these types of data in order to tackle relevant questions of interest. In this spirit, we describe here strategies (or lessons learned) for undergraduate educators with regard to better preparing undergraduate biology majors for the new types of challenges that lay ahead. The topics covered here span a broad range, from classroom approaches to the administrative level (e.g., fostering inter-departmental communication, student advising) and beyond. A key theme here is the need for an attitude shift with regard to mathematics education by both students and faculty alike. Such a shift will facilitate the development and implementation of new teaching strategies with regard to improving integration of mathematics and biology pedagogy.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/11/1/jmbe-11-1-28.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v11.i1.134&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error