1887

Ethical and Practical Similarities Between Pedagogical and Clinical Research

    Authors: Rachel L. Robson1,*, Vaughn E. Huckfeldt2
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology, Morningside College, Sioux City, IA, 51106; 2: Department of Languages, Linguistics and Philosophy, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Published 03 May 2012
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Biology Department, Morningside College, 1501 Morningside Avenue, Sioux City, IA 51106. Phone: 712-274-5304. E-mail: [email protected].
    • Copyright © 2012 American Society for Microbiology
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. May 2012 vol. 13 no. 1 28-31. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.360
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • PDF
    139.81 Kb
  • XML
  • HTML
    36.55 Kb

    Abstract:

    Clinical research and educational research face similar practical and ethical constraints that impact the rigor of both kinds of studies. Practical constraints facing undergraduate science education research include small sample sizes (largely a result of disproportionate incentives to conduct educational research at small colleges versus large universities), and the impossibility of randomizing individual students to separate arms of a study. Ethical constraints include gaining the informed consent and assuring the confidentiality of study participants, and the requirement of equipoise (i.e., that it is unethical to subject some study participants to an experimental treatment that researchers have good reason to believe to be inferior to another treatment). While these constraints have long been recognized for clinical research, their implications for educational research have not been fully recognized. Criticism that educational research lacks rigor should be tempered by the recognition that educational research is not parallel to laboratory research, but is parallel to clinical research. These parallels suggest solutions to some of the practical and ethical difficulties faced by educational researchers, as well.

Key Concept Ranking

Clinical Research
0.63593185
Clinical Trials
0.542498
0.63593185

References & Citations

1. Alberts B 2011 A new college Science prize [editorial] Science 331 10 10.1126/science.1202096 21212326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1202096
2. American College Personnel Association 2006 Statement of ethical principles and standards ACPA-College Student Educators International Washington, DC
3. American Medical Association 2010 Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations 2010–2011 AMA Chicago, IL
4. Andrews TM, Leonard MJ, Colgrove CA, Kalinowski ST 2011 Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college Biology courses CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 10 394 405 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061 22135373 3228657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061
5. Association of American Educators Advisory Board and Executive Committee 2011 Code of ethics for educators Association of American Educators Alexandria, VA
6. Bush SD, et al 2008 Science faculty with education specialties Science 322 1795 1796 10.1126/science.1162072 19095927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162072
7. Cohen J 1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 37 46 10.1177/001316446002000104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
8. Freedman B 1987 Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research N. Eng. J. Med. 317 141 145 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198707163170304
9. Fried C 1974 Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy North-Holland Publishing Amsterdam
10. Hellman S, Hellman D 1991 Of mice but not men: problems of the randomized clinical trial N. Eng. J. Med. 324 1585 1589 10.1056/NEJM199105303242208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199105303242208
11. Herreid CF 2010 It’s all their fault? JMBE 11 34 37 10.1128/jmbe.v11i1.138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v11i1.138
12. Knight JK, Wood WB 2005 Teaching more by lecturing less CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 4 298 310 10.1187/05-06-0082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082
13. Mazur E 2009 Farewell, lecture? Science 323 50 51 10.1126/science.1168927 19119207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1168927
14. Miller PB, Weijer C 2003 Rehabilitating equipoise Kennedy Institute of Ethics J 13 93 118 10.1353/ken.2003.0014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ken.2003.0014
15. Nehm RH 2006 Faith-based evolution education BioScience 56 638 639 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[638:FEE]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[638:FEE]2.0.CO;2
16. Ruiz-Primo MA, Briggs D, Iverson H, Talbot R, Shepard LA 2011 Impact of undergraduate Science course innovations on learning Science 331 1269 1270 10.1126/science.1198976 21393529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1198976
17. Sakvar V, Lokere J 2010 Time to decide: the ambivalence of the world of science toward education Nature Education Cambridge, MA
18. Towne L, Hilton M 2004 Implementing randomized field trials in education: report of a workshop National Academies Press Washington, DC
19. Williams JR 2009 World Medical Association Medical Ethics Manual 2nd edition World Medical Association Cedex, France
20. World Medical Association 2006 Declaration of Geneva 173rd Council Session Divonne-les-Bains, France World Medical Association Cedex, France
21. World Medical Association 2006 International Code of Medical Ethics 57th WMA General Assembly Pilanesberg, South Africa World Medical Association Cedex, France
22. World Medical Association 2008 Declaration of Helsinki 59th WMA General Assembly Seoul, South Korea World Medical Association Cedex, France

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.360
2012-05-03
2019-08-24

Abstract:

Clinical research and educational research face similar practical and ethical constraints that impact the rigor of both kinds of studies. Practical constraints facing undergraduate science education research include small sample sizes (largely a result of disproportionate incentives to conduct educational research at small colleges versus large universities), and the impossibility of randomizing individual students to separate arms of a study. Ethical constraints include gaining the informed consent and assuring the confidentiality of study participants, and the requirement of equipoise (i.e., that it is unethical to subject some study participants to an experimental treatment that researchers have good reason to believe to be inferior to another treatment). While these constraints have long been recognized for clinical research, their implications for educational research have not been fully recognized. Criticism that educational research lacks rigor should be tempered by the recognition that educational research is not parallel to laboratory research, but is parallel to clinical research. These parallels suggest solutions to some of the practical and ethical difficulties faced by educational researchers, as well.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/13/1/jmbe-13-1-028.xml.a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.360&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error