1887

Learning about Chemiosmosis and ATP Synthesis with Animations Outside of the Classroom

    Authors: Eric E. Goff1, Katie M. Reindl2, Christina Johnson3, Phillip McClean3, Erika G. Offerdahl2, Noah L. Schroeder4, Alan R. White1,*
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208; 2: Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102; 3: Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102; 4: Department of Leadership Studies in Education and Organizations, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Received 16 August 2016 Accepted 16 December 2016 Published 21 April 2017
    • ©2017 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.

    • [open-access] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.
    • †Supplemental materials available at http://asmscience.org/jmbe
    • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Petigru College, Suite 200, 1521 Greene St., University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. Phone: 803-777-1813. E-mail: [email protected].
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. April 2017 vol. 18 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • PDF
    471.90 Kb
  • XML
    79.17 Kb
  • HTML
    73.16 Kb

    Abstract:

    Many undergraduate biology courses have begun to implement instructional strategies aimed at increasing student interaction with course material outside of the classroom. Two examples of such practices are introducing students to concepts as preparation prior to instruction, and as conceptual reinforcement after the instructional period. Using a three-group design, we investigate the impact of an animation developed as part of the Virtual Cell Animation Collection on the topic of concentration gradients and their role in the actions of ATP synthase as a means of pre-class preparation or post-class reinforcement compared with a no-intervention control group. Results from seven sections of introductory biology ( = 732) randomized to treatments over two semesters show that students who viewed animation as preparation ( = 0.44, < 0.001) or as reinforcement ( = 0.53, < 0.001) both outperformed students in the control group on a follow-up assessment. Direct comparison of the preparation and reinforcement treatments shows no significant difference in student outcomes between the two treatment groups ( = 0.87). Results suggest that while student interaction with animations on the topic of concentration gradients outside of the classroom may lead to greater learning outcomes than the control group, in the traditional lecture-based course the timing of such interactions may not be as important.

References & Citations

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2011 Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action: a summary of recommendations made at a national conference organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, July 15–17, 2009 Washington, DC
2. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) 2012 Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics Executive Office of the President Washington, DC
3. Allen D, Tanner K 2005 Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex Cell Biol Educ 4 4 262 268 10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113 16344858 1305885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113
4. Freeman S, O’Connor E, Parks JW, Cunningham M, Hurley D, Haak D, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP 2007 Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology CBE Life Sci Educ 6 2 132 139 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194 17548875 1885904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194
5. Spell RM, Guinan JA, Miller KR, Beck CW 2014 Redefining authentic research experiences in introductory biology laboratories and barriers to their implementation CBE Life Sci Educ 13 1 102 110 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0169 24591509 3940451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0169
6. Aronson BD, Silveira LA 2009 From genes to proteins to behavior: a laboratory project that enhances student understanding in cell and molecular biology CBE Life Sci Educ 8 4 291 308 10.1187/cbe.09-07-0048 19952098 2786280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-07-0048
7. Brownell SE, Kloser MJ, Fukami T, Shavelson R 2012 Undergraduate biology lab courses: comparing the impact of traditionally based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences J Coll Sci Teach 41 4 36 45
8. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt N, Wenderoth MP 2014 Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics Proc Natl Acad Sci 111 23 8410 8415 10.1073/pnas.1319030111 24821756 4060654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
9. Davis KS 2003 “Change is hard”: what science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices Sci Educ 87 1 3 30 10.1002/sce.10037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10037
10. White C, Bradley E, Martindale J, Roy P, Patel K, Yoon M, Worden MK 2014 Why are medical students “checking out” of active learning in a new curriculum? Med Educ 48 3 315 324 10.1111/medu.12356 24528466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12356
11. Persky AM 2015 Qualitative analysis of animation versus reading for pre-class preparation in a “flipped” classroom J Excel Coll Teach 26 1 5 28
12. French M, Taverna F, Neumann M, Kushnir LP, Harlow J, Harrison D, Serbanescu R 2015 Textbook use in the sciences and its relation to course performance Coll Teach 63 4 171 177 10.1080/87567555.2015.1057099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1057099
13. Lee CD 2014 Worksheet usage, reading achievement, classes’ lack of readiness, and science achievement: a cross-country comparison Int J Educ Math Sci Technol 2 2 96 106 10.18404/ijemst.38331 http://dx.doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.38331
14. Long T, Logan J, Waugh M 2016 Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom Tech Trends 60 3 245 252 10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
15. Hill M, Sharma MD, Johnston H 2015 How online learning modules can improve the representational fluency and conceptual understanding of university physics students Eur J Phys 36 4 45019 10.1088/0143-0807/36/4/045019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/4/045019
16. Ferdig RE, Trammell KD 2004 Content delivery in the “blogosphere.” J Technol Horiz Educ 31 7 12
17. Aagaard L, Conner TW, Skidmore RL 2014 College textbook reading assignments and class time activity J Scholarsh Teach Learn 14 3 132 145 10.14434/josotl.v14i3.5031 http://dx.doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i3.5031
18. Hodges LC, Anderson EC, Carpenter TS, Cui L, Gierasch TM, Leupen S, Nanes KM, Wagner CR 2015 Using reading quizzes in STEM classes—the what, why, and how J Coll Sci Teach 45 1 49 55 10.2505/4/jcst15_045_01_49 http://dx.doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_045_01_49
19. Gross D, Pietri ES, Anderson G, Moyano-Camihort K, Graham MJ 2015 Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom CBE Life Sci Educ 14 4 10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040 26396151 4710397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040
20. Lineweaver TT 2010 Online discussion assignments improve students’ class preparation Teach Psychol 37 3 204 209 10.1080/00986283.2010.488546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488546
21. Wieman R, Arbaugh F 2014 Making homework more meaningful Math Teach Middle Sch 20 3 160 165 10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.20.3.0160 http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.20.3.0160
22. Gieger L, Nardo J, Schmeichel K, Zinner L 2014 A quantitative and qualitative comparison of homework structures in undergraduate mathematics
23. Hauk S, Powers RA, Segalla A 2015 A comparison of web-based and paper-and-pencil homework on student performance in college algebra PRIMUS 25 1 61 79 10.1080/10511970.2014.906006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2014.906006
24. Malik K, Martinez N, Romero J, Schubel S, Janowicz PA 2014 Mixed-methods study of online and written organic chemistry homework J Chem Educ 91 11 1804 1809 10.1021/ed400798t http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed400798t
25. Tas Y, Sungur-Vural S, Öztekin C 2014 A study of science teachers’ homework practices Res Educ 91 45 64 10.7227/RIE.91.1.5 http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/RIE.91.1.5
26. Bowman CR, Gulacar O, King DB 2014 Predicting student success via online homework usage J Learn Des 7 2 47 61
27. Planchard M, Daniel KL, Maroo J, Mishra C, McLean T 2015 Homework, motivation, and academic achievement in a college genetics course Bioscene J Coll Biol Teach 41 2 11 18
28. Santoro K, Bilisoly R 2015 Creating, automating, and assessing online homework in introductory statistics and mathematics classes ArXiv Prepr ArXiv:1501.03215 [stat.OT]
29. Lazarova K 2015 The role of online homework in low-enrollment college introductory physics courses J Coll Sci Teach 44 3 17 21 10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_17 http://dx.doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_17
30. Feng M, Roschelle J, Heffernan N, Fairman J, Murphy R 2014 Implementation of an intelligent tutoring system for online homework support in an efficacy trial
31. Shaw D 2015 The impact of using a clicker system and online homework on teaching effectiveness and student learning experience FASEB J 29 1 Suppl 687
32. Boucheix J-M, Schneider E 2009 Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems Learn Instr 19 2 112 127 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.004
33. Höffler TN, Leutner D 2011 The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations—evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis Comput Hum Behav 27 1 209 216 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042
34. Yarden H, Yarden A 2010 Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: students’ comprehension, prior knowledge and conceptual status of a biotechnological method Res Sci Educ 40 3 375 402 10.1007/s11165-009-9126-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9126-0
35. Katsioloudis P, Dickerson D, Jovanovic V, Jones M 2015 Evaluation of static vs. dynamic visualizations for engineering technology students and implications on spatial visualization ability: a quasi-experimental study Eng Des Graph J 79 1 14 28
36. Lowe RK 2003 Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics Learn Instr 13 2 157 176 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X
37. Driver R, Bell B 1986 Students’ thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist view Sch Sci Rev 67 240 443 456
38. Songer CJ, Mintzes JJ 1994 Understanding cellular respiration: an analysis of conceptual change in college biology J Res Sci Teach 31 6 621 637 10.1002/tea.3660310605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310605
39. Alparslan C, Tekkaya C, Geban Ö 2003 Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning J Biol Educ 37 3 133 137 10.1080/00219266.2003.9655868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655868
40. Mann M, Treagust DF 1998 A pencil and paper instrument to diagnose students’ conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration Aust Sci Teach J 44 2 55
41. Seymour J, Longden B 1991 Respiration—that’s breathing isn’t it? J Biol Educ 25 3 177 183 10.1080/00219266.1991.9655203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1991.9655203
42. McDermott LC 1991 Millikan lecture 1990: what we teach and what is learned—closing the gap Am J Phys 59 4 301 315 10.1119/1.16539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.16539
43. Wright LK, Fisk JN, Newman DL 2014 DNA → RNA: what do students think the arrow means? CBE Life Sci Educ 13 2 338 348 10.1187/cbe.CBE-13-09-0188 4041510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.CBE-13-09-0188
44. Jensen JL, Kummer TA, Godoy PDdM 2015 Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning CBE Life Sci Educ 14 1 ar5 10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129 25699543 4353080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
45. Andrews TM, Leonard MJ, Colgrove CA, Kalinowski ST 2011 Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses CBE Life Sci Educ 10 4 394 405 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061 22135373 3228657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061
46. Anliker R, Aydt M, Kellams M, Rothlisberger J 1997 Improving student achievement through encouragement of homework completion Institute of Education Sciences Washington, DC
47. Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT 2013 Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology Psychol Sci Public Interest 14 1 4 58 10.1177/1529100612453266 26173288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
48. Crowe A, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP 2008 Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology CBE Life Sci Educ 7 4 368 381 10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024 19047424 2592046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024
49. Mayer RE 2009 Multimedia learning Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA 10.1017/CBO9780511811678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
50. Mayer RE, Moreno R 2002 Animation as an aid to multimedia learning Educ Psychol Rev 14 1 87 99 10.1023/A:1013184611077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077
51. Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tukey JW 1983 Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis 3 Wiley New York, NY
52. Bray F 2007 Gender and technology Annu Rev Anthropol 36 1 37 53 10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094328
53. Ching CC, Basham JD, Jang E 2005 The legacy of the digital divide gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum technology use among young adults Urban Educ 40 4 394 411 10.1177/0042085905276389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085905276389
54. Islam MA, Rahim NAA, Liang TC, Momtaz H 2011 Effect of demographic factors on e-learning effectiveness in a higher learning institution in Malaysia Int Educ Stud 4 1 112 10.5539/ies.v4n1p112 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n1p112
55. O’Day DH 2010 Animations are dynamic, effective tools for science teaching: if you just follow the rules! J Coll Teach Learn 7 12 19 25
56. Wong M, Castro-Alonso JC, Ayres P, Paas F 2015 Gender effects when learning manipulative tasks from instructional animations and static presentations Educ Technol Soc 18 4 37 52
57. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Mumper RJ 2014 The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school Acad Med 89 2 236 243 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086
58. O’Flaherty J, Phillips C 2015 The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review Internet High Educ 25 85 95 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
59. Eagan K, Stolzenberg EB, Lozano JB, Aragon MC, Suchard MR, Hurtado S 2014 Undergraduate teaching faculty: the 2013–2014 HERI faculty survey Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA Los Angeles, CA

Supplemental Material

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223
2017-04-21
2019-11-13

Abstract:

Many undergraduate biology courses have begun to implement instructional strategies aimed at increasing student interaction with course material outside of the classroom. Two examples of such practices are introducing students to concepts as preparation prior to instruction, and as conceptual reinforcement after the instructional period. Using a three-group design, we investigate the impact of an animation developed as part of the Virtual Cell Animation Collection on the topic of concentration gradients and their role in the actions of ATP synthase as a means of pre-class preparation or post-class reinforcement compared with a no-intervention control group. Results from seven sections of introductory biology ( = 732) randomized to treatments over two semesters show that students who viewed animation as preparation ( = 0.44, < 0.001) or as reinforcement ( = 0.53, < 0.001) both outperformed students in the control group on a follow-up assessment. Direct comparison of the preparation and reinforcement treatments shows no significant difference in student outcomes between the two treatment groups ( = 0.87). Results suggest that while student interaction with animations on the topic of concentration gradients outside of the classroom may lead to greater learning outcomes than the control group, in the traditional lecture-based course the timing of such interactions may not be as important.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/18/1/jmbe-18-5.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Author and Article Information

  • Received 16 August 2016 Accepted 16 December 2016 Published 21 April 2017
  • ©2017 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology.

  • [open-access] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.
  • †Supplemental materials available at http://asmscience.org/jmbe
  • *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Petigru College, Suite 200, 1521 Greene St., University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. Phone: 803-777-1813. E-mail: [email protected].

Figures

Learning about Chemiosmosis and ATP Synthesis with Animations Outside of the Classroom
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-1,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Eric E., foaf_name=Eric E. Goff, foaf_surname=Goff, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff1]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-2,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-2,properties={foaf_givenname=Katie M., foaf_name=Katie M. Reindl, foaf_surname=Reindl, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff2]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-3,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-3,properties={foaf_givenname=Christina, foaf_name=Christina Johnson, foaf_surname=Johnson, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff3]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-4,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-4,properties={foaf_givenname=Phillip, foaf_name=Phillip McClean, foaf_surname=McClean, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff3]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-5,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-5,properties={foaf_givenname=Erika G., foaf_name=Erika G. Offerdahl, foaf_surname=Offerdahl, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff2]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-6,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-6,properties={foaf_givenname=Noah L., foaf_name=Noah L. Schroeder, foaf_surname=Schroeder, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff4]]}], com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-7,webId=/content/author/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-7,properties={foaf_givenname=Alan R., foaf_name=Alan R. White, foaf_surname=White, pub_correspondenceLink=*, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223-aff1]]}]]
Citation: Goff E, Reindl K, Johnson C, McClean P, Offerdahl E, Schroeder N, White A. 2017. Learning about chemiosmosis and atp synthesis with animations outside of the classroom . J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 18(1): doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223
/content/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223.f1-jmbe-18-5
FIGURE 1

Experimental treatment groups as defined by the presence and timing of their interaction with Virtual Cell animations.

jmbe/18/1/jmbe-18-5f1_thmb.gif
jmbe/18/1/jmbe-18-5f1.gif
Image of FIGURE 1

Click to view

FIGURE 1

Experimental treatment groups as defined by the presence and timing of their interaction with Virtual Cell animations.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. April 2017 vol. 18 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223
Download as Powerpoint
/content/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223.f2-jmbe-18-5
FIGURE 2

Descriptive statistics for mean score on the follow-up assignment by treatment condition. Bars in the boxes represent the median; the box represents the range between the first and third quartile, and the whiskers represent the standard deviation.

jmbe/18/1/jmbe-18-5f2_thmb.gif
jmbe/18/1/jmbe-18-5f2.gif
Image of FIGURE 2

Click to view

FIGURE 2

Descriptive statistics for mean score on the follow-up assignment by treatment condition. Bars in the boxes represent the median; the box represents the range between the first and third quartile, and the whiskers represent the standard deviation.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. April 2017 vol. 18 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1223
Download as Powerpoint

Back to top
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error