1887

Poster Development and Presentation to Improve Scientific Inquiry and Broaden Effective Scientific Communication Skills

    Authors: Ines Rauschenbach1,*, Ramaydalis Keddis1, Diane Davis1
    VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONS
    Affiliations: 1: Rutgers University, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
    AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION AUTHOR AND ARTICLE INFORMATION
    Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. March 2018 vol. 19 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1511
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
  • PDF
    310.85 Kb
  • XML
    71.91 Kb
  • HTML
    55.28 Kb

    Abstract:

    We have redesigned a tried-and-true laboratory exercise into an inquiry-based team activity exploring microbial growth control, and implemented this activity as the basis for preparing a scientific poster in a large, multi-section laboratory course. Spanning most of the semester, this project culminates in a poster presentation of data generated from a student-designed experiment. Students use and apply the scientific method and improve written and verbal communication skills. The guided inquiry format of this exercise provides the opportunity for student collaboration through cooperative learning. For each learning objective, a percentage score was tabulated (learning objective score = points awarded/total possible points). A score of 80% was our benchmark for achieving each objective. At least 76% of the student groups participating in this project over two semesters achieved each learning goal. Student perceptions of the project were evaluated using a survey. Nearly 90% of participating students felt they had learned a great deal in the areas of formulating a hypothesis, experimental design, and collecting and analyzing data; 72% of students felt this project had improved their scientific writing skills. In a separate survey, 84% of students who responded felt that peer review was valuable in improving their final poster submission. We designed this inquiry-based poster project to improve student scientific communication skills. This exercise is appropriate for any microbiology laboratory course whose learning outcomes include the development of scientific inquiry and literacy.

References & Citations

1. Buxeda RJ, Moore DA 2001 Expanding a learner-centered environment using group reports and constructivist portfolios Microbiol Education 2 12 17 10.1128/154288101X14285805784116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/154288101X14285805784116
2. Tanner K, Chatman LS, Allen D 2003 Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning in the science classroom—beyond students working in groups Cell Biol Educ 2 1 5 10.1187/cbe.03-03-0010 12822033 152788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-03-0010
3. Knight JK, Wood WB 2005 Teaching more by lecturing less Cell Biol Educ 4 315 317 10.1187/05-06-0082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082
4. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan S 1999 Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis Rev Educ Res 69 21 51 10.3102/00346543069001021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
5. Crowe M, Hill C 2006 Setting the stage for good group dynamics in semester-long projects in the sciences J Coll Sci Teach 35 32 35
6. Stanton JD 2013 A poster-session review to reinforce course concepts and improve scientific communication skills J Microbiol Biol Educ 14 116 117 10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.519 23858364 3706143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.519
7. Lepek D, Stock RJ 2011 Alternative lab reports—engineering effective communication Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education. Annual Conference and Exposition Vancouver, BC, Canada 2011https://peer.asee.org/17438.
8. Schmitt-Harsh M, Harsh JA 2013 The development and implementation of an inquiry-based poster project on sustainability in a large non-majors environmental science course J Environ Stud Sci 3 56 64 10.1007/s13412-012-0090-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0090-z
9. Logan JL, Quinones R, Sunderland D 2015 Poster presentation: turning a lab of the week into a culminating experience J Chem Educ 92 96 101 10.1021/ed400695x http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed400695x
10. Waters N 2015 A poster assignment connects information literacy and writing skills Iss Sci Technol Librarian 80 1 3
11. Rauschenbach I, Keddis R, Davis D 2017 Microbiology laboratory exercises 1st ed Rutgers University Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology New Brunswick, NJ
12. Gormally C, Brickman P, Hallar B, Armstrong A 2009 Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn 3 2 Article 16
13. National Research Council 2003 Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists Washington DC The National Academies Press
14. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2011 Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action: a summary of recommendations made at a national conference organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, July 15–17, 2009 Washington, DC
15. Brownell SE, Hekmat-Scafe DS, Singla V, Seawell PC, Imam JF, Eddy SL, Stearns T, Cyert M 2015 A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data CBE Life Sci Educ 14 1 14 10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092
16. Brownell SE, Kloser MJ, Fukami T, Shavelson R 2012 Undergraduate biology lab courses: comparing the impact of traditionally based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences J Coll Sci Teach 41 36 45
17. Howard DR, Miskowski JA 2005 Using a module-based laboratory to incorporate inquiry into a large cell biology course Cell Biol Educ 4 249 260 10.1187/cbe.04-09-0052 16220145 1200779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-09-0052
18. Gasper BJ, Gardner SM 2013 Engaging students in authentic microbiology research in an introductory biology laboratory course is correlated with gains in student understanding of the nature of authentic research and critical thinking J Microbiol Biol Educ 14 25 33 10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.460 23858351 3706163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.460
19. Cervato C, Gallus W, Flory D, Moss E, Slade M, Kawaler S, Marengo M, Woo K, Krumhardt B, Clough M, Campbell A, Acerbo M 2015 It takes a village to make a scientist: reflections of a faculty learning community J Coll Sci Teach 44 322 329 10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_22 http://dx.doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_22
20. Arce J, Betancourt R 1997 Student-designed experiments in scientific lab instruction J Coll Sci Teach 27 114 118
21. Crandall GD 1997 Old wine into new bottles. How traditional lab exercises can be converted into investigative ones J Coll Sci Teach 26 413 418
22. Buck LB, Bretz SL, Towns MH 2008 Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory J Coll Sci Teach 32 52 58
23. Auerbach AJ, Schussler E 2017 Curriculum alignment with Vision and Change improves student scientific literacy CBE Life Sci Educ 16 2 ar29 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160 28495933 5459247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160
24. Trautmann N 2009 Designing peer review for pedagogical success—what can we learn from professional science? J Coll Sci Teach 38 14 19
25. Senkevitch E, Smith AC, Marbach-Ad G, Song W 2011 Improving scientific research and writing skills through peer review and empirical group learning J Microbiol Biol Educ 12 157 165 10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.319 23653760 3577248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.319
26. Emmert EAB 2013 Biosafety guidelines for handling microorganisms in the teaching laboratory: development and rationale J Microbiol Biol Educ 14 78 83 10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.531 23858356 3706168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.531
27. Emmert EAB, Bird JB, Gyure RA, Hartman D, White A 2012 Guidelines for biosafety in teaching laboratories American Society for Microbiology https://www.asm.org/images/asm_biosafety_guidelines-FINAL.pdf
28. Rutgers REHS 2016 Rutgers University biosafety guidelines for teaching laboratorieshttp://rehs.rutgers.edu/pdf_files/RUBiosafety0GuidelinesforTeachingLaboratories.pdf.
29. A faculty guide to submitting courses for certification for the SAS core curriculum Rutgers New Brunswick, NJ https://sas.rutgers.edu/documents/core-requirements/632-faculty-guide-to-core-certification/file

Supplemental Material

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1511
2018-03-30
2019-08-18

Abstract:

We have redesigned a tried-and-true laboratory exercise into an inquiry-based team activity exploring microbial growth control, and implemented this activity as the basis for preparing a scientific poster in a large, multi-section laboratory course. Spanning most of the semester, this project culminates in a poster presentation of data generated from a student-designed experiment. Students use and apply the scientific method and improve written and verbal communication skills. The guided inquiry format of this exercise provides the opportunity for student collaboration through cooperative learning. For each learning objective, a percentage score was tabulated (learning objective score = points awarded/total possible points). A score of 80% was our benchmark for achieving each objective. At least 76% of the student groups participating in this project over two semesters achieved each learning goal. Student perceptions of the project were evaluated using a survey. Nearly 90% of participating students felt they had learned a great deal in the areas of formulating a hypothesis, experimental design, and collecting and analyzing data; 72% of students felt this project had improved their scientific writing skills. In a separate survey, 84% of students who responded felt that peer review was valuable in improving their final poster submission. We designed this inquiry-based poster project to improve student scientific communication skills. This exercise is appropriate for any microbiology laboratory course whose learning outcomes include the development of scientific inquiry and literacy.

Highlighted Text: Show | Hide
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmbe/19/1/jmbe-19-19.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1511&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Figures

Image of FIGURE 1

Click to view

FIGURE 1

Student perception of knowledge acquired throughout the project. Students ( = 155) were anonymously surveyed about how they perceived their learning about the application of the scientific method and poster design.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. March 2018 vol. 19 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1511
Download as Powerpoint
Image of FIGURE 2

Click to view

FIGURE 2

Student perception of skills gained after the poster project ( = 155). The statement “I have designed and presented a poster before; however this project did not teach me any new skills” received 20% response.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. March 2018 vol. 19 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1511
Download as Powerpoint
Image of FIGURE 3

Click to view

FIGURE 3

Student assessment of peer review. Students ( = 57) were surveyed via SurveyMonkey on whether they thought the peer review process was helpful and provided valuable feedback.

Source: J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. March 2018 vol. 19 no. 1 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1511
Download as Powerpoint

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error