No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Repeat-Induced Point Mutation and Other Genome Defense Mechanisms in Fungi
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
- Author: Eugene Gladyshev1
- Editors: Joseph Heitman2, Eva Holtgrewe Stukenbrock3
-
VIEW AFFILIATIONS HIDE AFFILIATIONSAffiliations: 1: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; 2: Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710; 3: Environmental Genomics, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany, and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany
-
Received 30 January 2017 Accepted 01 February 2017 Published 14 July 2017
- Correspondence: Eugene Gladyshev, [email protected]
Source:
microbiolspec
July 2017
vol. 5 no. 4 doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
-
Abstract:
Transposable elements have colonized the genomes of nearly all organisms, including fungi. Although transposable elements may sometimes provide beneficial functions to their hosts their overall impact is considered deleterious. As a result, the activity of transposable elements needs to be counterbalanced by the host genome defenses. In fungi, the primary genome defense mechanisms include repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) and methylation induced premeiotically, meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA, sex-induced silencing, cosuppression (also known as somatic quelling), and cotranscriptional RNA surveillance. Recent studies of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa have shown that the process of repeat recognition for RIP apparently involves interactions between coaligned double-stranded segments of chromosomal DNA. These studies have also shown that RIP can be mediated by the conserved pathway that establishes transcriptional (heterochromatic) silencing of repetitive DNA. In light of these new findings, RIP emerges as a specialized case of the general phenomenon of heterochromatic silencing of repetitive DNA.
-
Citation: Gladyshev E. 2017. Repeat-Induced Point Mutation and Other Genome Defense Mechanisms in Fungi. Microbiol Spectrum 5(4):FUNK-0042-2017. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017.
Preview this microbiology spectrum article:
Repeat-Induced Point Mutation and Other Genome Defense Mechanisms in Fungi, Page 1 of 2
< Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017-2.gif
References
Article metrics loading...
/content/journal/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
2017-07-14
2021-04-11
Abstract:
Transposable elements have colonized the genomes of nearly all organisms, including fungi. Although transposable elements may sometimes provide beneficial functions to their hosts their overall impact is considered deleterious. As a result, the activity of transposable elements needs to be counterbalanced by the host genome defenses. In fungi, the primary genome defense mechanisms include repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) and methylation induced premeiotically, meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA, sex-induced silencing, cosuppression (also known as somatic quelling), and cotranscriptional RNA surveillance. Recent studies of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa have shown that the process of repeat recognition for RIP apparently involves interactions between coaligned double-stranded segments of chromosomal DNA. These studies have also shown that RIP can be mediated by the conserved pathway that establishes transcriptional (heterochromatic) silencing of repetitive DNA. In light of these new findings, RIP emerges as a specialized case of the general phenomenon of heterochromatic silencing of repetitive DNA.
Highlighted Text:
Show |
Hide
Full text loading...
/deliver/fulltext/microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017.html?itemId=/content/journal/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
Figures
Repeat-Induced Point Mutation and Other Genome Defense Mechanisms in Fungi
[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/author/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017-1,webId=/content/author/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017-1,properties={foaf_givenname=Eugene, foaf_name=Eugene Gladyshev, foaf_surname=Gladyshev, pub_isAffiliatedWith=[com.pub2web.rdf.cci.facet.ContentItem[id=http://asm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/affiliation/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017-aff1]]}]]
Citation:
Gladyshev E. 2017. Repeat-induced point mutation and other genome defense mechanisms in fungi. microbiolspec 5(4): doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
/content/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017.fig1
FIGURE 1
The structure of motif VI in Masc1/RID proteins is not canonical. The canonical motif VI contains the absolutely conserved NV diad (asparagine-valine). This diad is present in all C5-cytosine methyltransferases except Masc1/RID. The asparagine residue of NV physically interacts with the proline residue of the catalytic triad PCQ (in motif IV) and thus plays a critical role by controlling the positions of these segments with respect to one another in the native structure of the protein. The valine residue of NV is also functionally important, because its substitution for alanine is known to inactivate the catalytic activity of M.HhaI. Yet in all Masc1/RID proteins the NV diad is replaced with either QT (e.g., in Neurospora RID) or ET (e.g., in Ascobolus Masc1), hinting at the possibility that Masc1/RID proteins might have unique catalytic and/or substrate requirements.
microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017-fig1_thmb.gif
microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017-fig1.gif
Click to view
FIGURE 1
The structure of motif VI in Masc1/RID proteins is not canonical. The canonical motif VI contains the absolutely conserved NV diad (asparagine-valine). This diad is present in all C5-cytosine methyltransferases except Masc1/RID. The asparagine residue of NV physically interacts with the proline residue of the catalytic triad PCQ (in motif IV) and thus plays a critical role by controlling the positions of these segments with respect to one another in the native structure of the protein. The valine residue of NV is also functionally important, because its substitution for alanine is known to inactivate the catalytic activity of M.HhaI. Yet in all Masc1/RID proteins the NV diad is replaced with either QT (e.g., in Neurospora RID) or ET (e.g., in Ascobolus Masc1), hinting at the possibility that Masc1/RID proteins might have unique catalytic and/or substrate requirements.
Source:
microbiolspec
July 2017
vol. 5 no. 4 doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
/content/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017.fig2
FIGURE 2
Recognition of interspersed homology during RIP in N. crassa. This assay detects and quantifies the occurrence of RIP mutations in response to engineered DNA repeats. Instances of DNA homology are created between two short segments of chromosomal DNA, one of which is normally represented by an endogenous sequence, while the sequence and orientation of the other segment can be manipulated as desired. In this situation, the number of RIP mutations provides a very sensitive readout of DNA homology perceived by the recombination-independent mechanism of repeat recognition for RIP. (A) Weak interspersed homology is formed between the endogenous 500-bp segment (blue) and a synthetic DNA segment (green) integrated at a nearby position as the replacement of the cyclosporin-resistant-1 (csr-1) gene. This particular pattern involves 4-bp units of homology spaced with the periodicity of 11 bp and exists between “repeat units” in the inverted orientation. (B) Pairwise sequence comparisons showing all matches of 4 bp long. Two situations are presented: random homology (left panel) and interspersed homology (right panel). No cryptic homology can be seen except the intended pattern of weak interspersed homology (magenta box). (C) The occurrence of mutations induced by weak interspersed homology. Seventy progeny spores from the “XKO” cross (
70
), which had been previously found to contain at least one RIP mutation, were reanalyzed by sequencing of an additional 255 bp in the “left” flank of the construct (corresponding to the single-copy coding/translated sequence of NCU00725).
microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017-fig2_thmb.gif
microbiolspec/5/4/FUNK-0042-2017-fig2.gif
Click to view
FIGURE 2
Recognition of interspersed homology during RIP in N. crassa. This assay detects and quantifies the occurrence of RIP mutations in response to engineered DNA repeats. Instances of DNA homology are created between two short segments of chromosomal DNA, one of which is normally represented by an endogenous sequence, while the sequence and orientation of the other segment can be manipulated as desired. In this situation, the number of RIP mutations provides a very sensitive readout of DNA homology perceived by the recombination-independent mechanism of repeat recognition for RIP. (A) Weak interspersed homology is formed between the endogenous 500-bp segment (blue) and a synthetic DNA segment (green) integrated at a nearby position as the replacement of the cyclosporin-resistant-1 (csr-1) gene. This particular pattern involves 4-bp units of homology spaced with the periodicity of 11 bp and exists between “repeat units” in the inverted orientation. (B) Pairwise sequence comparisons showing all matches of 4 bp long. Two situations are presented: random homology (left panel) and interspersed homology (right panel). No cryptic homology can be seen except the intended pattern of weak interspersed homology (magenta box). (C) The occurrence of mutations induced by weak interspersed homology. Seventy progeny spores from the “XKO” cross ( 70 ), which had been previously found to contain at least one RIP mutation, were reanalyzed by sequencing of an additional 255 bp in the “left” flank of the construct (corresponding to the single-copy coding/translated sequence of NCU00725).
Source:
microbiolspec
July 2017
vol. 5 no. 4 doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
Supplemental Material
No supplementary material available for this content.
Related Content
/content/journal/microbiolspec/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0042-2017
pub_author
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5